1,720,970 research outputs found
Molecular Determinants of Selectivity in Disordered Complexes May Shed Light on Specificity in Protein Condensates
Biomolecular condensates challenge the classical concepts of molecular recognition. The variable composition and heterogeneous conformations of liquid‐like protein droplets are bottlenecks for high‐resolution structural studies. To obtain atomistic insights into the organization of these assemblies, here we have characterized the conformational ensembles of specific disordered complexes, including those of droplet‐driving proteins. First, we found that these specific complexes exhibit a high degree of conformational heterogeneity. Second, we found that residues forming contacts at the interface also sample many conformations. Third, we found that different patterns of contacting residues form the specific interface. In addition, we observed a wide range of sequence motifs mediating disordered interactions, including charged, hydrophobic and polar contacts. These results demonstrate that selective recognition can be realized by variable patterns of weakly defined interaction motifs in many different binding configurations. We propose that these principles also play roles in determining the selectivity of biomolecular condensates
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Combining Protein Conformational Diversity and Phylogenetic Information Using CoDNaS and CoDNaS-Q
CoDNaS (http://ufq.unq.edu.ar/codnas/) and CoDNaS-Q (http://ufq.unq.edu.ar/codnasq) are repositories of proteins with different degrees of conformational diversity. Following the ensemble nature of the native state, conformational diversity represents the structural differences between the conformers in the ensemble. Each entry in CoDNaS and CoDNaS-Q contains a redundant collection of experimentally determined conformers obtained under different conditions. These conformers represent snapshots of the protein dynamism. While CoDNaS contains examples of conformational diversity at the tertiary level, a recent development, CoDNaS-Q, contains examples at the quaternary level. In the emerging age of accurate protein structure prediction by machine learning approaches, many questions remain open regarding the characterization of protein dynamism. In this context, most bioinformatics resources take advantage of distinct features derived from protein alignments, however, the complexity and heterogeneity of information makes it difficult to recover reliable biological signatures. Here we present five protocols to explore tertiary and quaternary conformational diversity at the individual protein level as well as for the characterization of the distribution of conformational diversity at the protein family level in a phylogenetic context. These protocols can provide curated protein families with experimentally known conformational diversity, facilitating the exploration of sequence determinants of protein dynamism. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Assessing conformational diversity with CoDNaS. Alternate Protocol 1: Assessing conformational diversity at the quaternary level with CoDNaS-Q. Basic Protocol 2: Exploring conformational diversity in a protein family. Alternate Protocol 2: Exploring quaternary conformational diversity in a protein family. Basic Protocol 3: Representing conformational diversity in a phylogenetic context
FLIPPER: Predicting and Characterizing Linear Interacting Peptides in the Protein Data Bank
A large fraction of peptides or protein regions are disordered in isolation and fold upon binding. These regions, also called MoRFs, SLiMs or LIPs, are often associated with signaling and regulation processes. However, despite their importance, only a limited number of examples are available in public databases and their automatic detection at the proteome level is problematic. Here we present FLIPPER, an automatic method for the detection of structurally linear sub-regions or peptides that interact with another chain in a protein complex. FLIPPER is a random forest classification that takes the protein structure as input and provides the propensity of each amino acid to be part of a LIP region. Models are built taking into consideration structural features such as intra- and inter-chain contacts, secondary structure, solvent accessibility in both bound and unbound state, structural linearity and chain length. FLIPPER is accurate when evaluated on non-redundant independent datasets, 99% precision and 99% sensitivity on PixelDB-25 and 87% precision and 88% sensitivity on DIBS-25. Finally, we used FLIPPER to process the entire Protein Data Bank and identified different classes of LIPs based on different binding modes and partner molecules. We provide a detailed description of these LIP categories and show that a large fraction of these regions are not detected by disorder predictors. All FLIPPER predictions are integrated in the MobiDB 4.0 database
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Searching and Using MobiDB Resource 6 to Explore Predictions and Annotations for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) make up around 30% of eukaryotic proteomes and play a crucial role in cellular processes and in pathological conditions such as neurodegenerative disorders and cancers. However, IDPs exhibit dynamic conformational ensembles and are often involved in the formation of biomolecular condensates. Understanding the function of IDPs is critical to research in many areas of science. MobiDB is a unique resource that serves as a comprehensive knowledgebase of IDPs and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), combining disorder annotations from experimental evidence and predictions for a broad range of protein sequences. Over the past decade, MobiDB has evolved with a focus on expanding annotation coverage, standardizing annotation provenance, and enhancing database accessibility. The latest MobiDB, version 6, released in July 2024, includes significant improvements, such as the integration of AlphaFoldDB predictions and a new homology transfer pipeline that has substantially increased the number of entries with high-quality annotations. The user interface has also been updated, highlighting annotation features, clarifying the entry page, and providing an immediate overview of disorder, binding, and disorder functions information in the protein sequence. This protocol guides the user through applications of the MobiDB, including disorder prediction, curated data analysis, and exploration of interaction data. This guide covers how to perform a search in MobiDB annotations using the web interface and the MobiDB REST API for programmatic access. The protocols use a step-by-step walkthrough using the human growth hormone receptor to demonstrate MobiDB's functions for visualization and interpretation of protein disorder data. © 2024 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Searching MobiDB query formats. Basic Protocol 2: Searching MobiDB selected datasets and selected proteomes. Basic Protocol 3: Performing a search on the Statistics page in MobiDB. Support Protocol: Programmatic access with MobiDB REST API. Basic Protocol 4: Visualizing and interpreting a MobiDB Entry: The GHR use case
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
