1,721,719 research outputs found

    Fotografía UDBC020890

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Montero, I. 3006, determinado como Croton palanostigm

    Fotografía UDBC020765

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Montero, I. 3005, determinado como Theobroma microcarpu

    Fotografía UDBC020888

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Montero, I. 2853, determinado como Connarus fasciculatu

    Fotografía UDBC020807

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Montero, I. 29611, determinado como Gloeospermum sp

    Fotografía UDBC020829

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Montero, I. 27981, determinado como Gustavia hexapetal

    Fotografía UDBC020766

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Montero, I. 2797, determinado como Pouteria elegan

    Fotografía UDBC020889

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Montero, I. 3020, determinado como Matisia bracteolos

    Francesc Montero i Aulet, «Manuel Brunet. El periodisme d’idee

    Get PDF
    Book review: Francesc Montero i Aulet, Manuel Brunet. El periodisme d’idees a l’ull de l’huracà, Catarroja/Barcelona, Editorial Afers, 2016, 368 pp., ISBN: 978-84-16260-21-8

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore