1,723,081 research outputs found
Fotografía UDBC021641
No full textFotografía del ejemplar Monroy, J., determinado como Escallonia pendula en el año 201
MONROY, J. Refugio
No full textCover page with the seal of the Pro-Serrano Committee titled “File #77 “M”. Mr. Monroy J. Refugio. Querétaro #587, Tepic, Nayarit”. Correspondence exchanged among Mr. J. Refugio Monroy, Gen. Francisco R. Serrano, Gen. Arturo Lazo de la Vega and Justo A. Santa Anna, Secretary and undersecretary, respectively, of the Pro-Serrano Committee. In the correspondence, J. Refugio Monroy informs Gen. Serrano of the political situation in the state of Nayarit, of the Obregonista and Serranista forces and the importance of each group, he suggests taking steps to ask for guarantees for the company from the Governor and announces an Obregonista convention in the state that must be made to fail. Additionally, he requests advertising material to distribute. Reply from Gen. Arturo Lazo de la Vega, thanking him for the information on behalf of Gen. Serrano. J. Refugio Monroy informs Justo A. Santa Anna of the failure of the Obregonista convention, which could not take place. He denounces the persecution suffered by the Serranistas and Gomistas at the hands of Governor Francisco Ramírez Romano, who savagely murdered Monroy’s brother due to his Serranista ties. He indicates the Obregonista affiliation of Mr. Mateo Flores, who denied his affiliation in order to spy on Non-Reelection party members. Reply from the Pro-Serrano Committee thanking him for his cooperation and informing him that that the murder of his brother was already protested before the Secretariat of the Interior. / Portada con el sello del Comité Pro-Serrano titulada "Expediente #77 "M". Sr. Monroy J. Refugio. Querétaro #587, Tepic, Nay.". Correspondencia entre el Sr. J. Refugio Monroy, el Gral. Francisco R. Serrano, Gral. Arturo Lazo de la Vega y Justo A. Santa Anna, Secretario y Subsecretario, respectivamente, del Comité Pro-Serrano, en la que J. Refugio Monroy informa al Gral. Serrano de la situación política en el estado de Nayarit; de las fuerzas obregonistas y serranistas y la importancia de cada una; sugiere hacer gestiones ante el Gobernador para pedir garantías para la campaña; anuncia una convención obregonista en el estado que hay que hacer fracasar; solicita propaganda para repartirla. Respuesta del Gral. Arturo Lazo de la Vega, agradeciendo los informes a nombre del Gral. Serrano. J. Refugio Monroy informa a Justo A. Santa Anna del fracaso de la convención obregonista que no se pudo realizar; denuncia persecuciones que sufren los serranistas y gomistas por parte del Gobernador Francisco Ramírez Romano, quien ya asesinó salvajemente a su hermano a causa de su filiación serranista; informa de la filiación obregonista del Sr. Mateo Flores, quien negó serlo para poder espiar a los partidarios de la No-Reelección. Respuesta del Comité Pro-Serrano agradeciendo su cooperación e informándole que ya protestaron por el asesinato de su hermano ante la Secretaría de Gobernación
MONROY, J. Refugio
No full textCover page with the seal of the Pro-Serrano Committee titled “File #77 “M”. Mr. Monroy J. Refugio. Querétaro #587, Tepic, Nayarit”. Correspondence exchanged among Mr. J. Refugio Monroy, Gen. Francisco R. Serrano, Gen. Arturo Lazo de la Vega and Justo A. Santa Anna, Secretary and undersecretary, respectively, of the Pro-Serrano Committee. In the correspondence, J. Refugio Monroy informs Gen. Serrano of the political situation in the state of Nayarit, of the Obregonista and Serranista forces and the importance of each group, he suggests taking steps to ask for guarantees for the company from the Governor and announces an Obregonista convention in the state that must be made to fail. Additionally, he requests advertising material to distribute. Reply from Gen. Arturo Lazo de la Vega, thanking him for the information on behalf of Gen. Serrano. J. Refugio Monroy informs Justo A. Santa Anna of the failure of the Obregonista convention, which could not take place. He denounces the persecution suffered by the Serranistas and Gomistas at the hands of Governor Francisco Ramírez Romano, who savagely murdered Monroy’s brother due to his Serranista ties. He indicates the Obregonista affiliation of Mr. Mateo Flores, who denied his affiliation in order to spy on Non-Reelection party members. Reply from the Pro-Serrano Committee thanking him for his cooperation and informing him that that the murder of his brother was already protested before the Secretariat of the Interior. / Portada con el sello del Comité Pro-Serrano titulada "Expediente #77 "M". Sr. Monroy J. Refugio. Querétaro #587, Tepic, Nay.". Correspondencia entre el Sr. J. Refugio Monroy, el Gral. Francisco R. Serrano, Gral. Arturo Lazo de la Vega y Justo A. Santa Anna, Secretario y Subsecretario, respectivamente, del Comité Pro-Serrano, en la que J. Refugio Monroy informa al Gral. Serrano de la situación política en el estado de Nayarit; de las fuerzas obregonistas y serranistas y la importancia de cada una; sugiere hacer gestiones ante el Gobernador para pedir garantías para la campaña; anuncia una convención obregonista en el estado que hay que hacer fracasar; solicita propaganda para repartirla. Respuesta del Gral. Arturo Lazo de la Vega, agradeciendo los informes a nombre del Gral. Serrano. J. Refugio Monroy informa a Justo A. Santa Anna del fracaso de la convención obregonista que no se pudo realizar; denuncia persecuciones que sufren los serranistas y gomistas por parte del Gobernador Francisco Ramírez Romano, quien ya asesinó salvajemente a su hermano a causa de su filiación serranista; informa de la filiación obregonista del Sr. Mateo Flores, quien negó serlo para poder espiar a los partidarios de la No-Reelección. Respuesta del Comité Pro-Serrano agradeciendo su cooperación e informándole que ya protestaron por el asesinato de su hermano ante la Secretaría de Gobernación
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
