1,721,026 research outputs found
FATE OF NITROGEN (N-15) FROM OXAMIDE AND UREA APPLIED TO TURF GRASS - A LYSIMETER STUDY
No full textSlow release N fertilizers are receiving increasing attention for use on turf grass, but their fate in the plant-soil system is still poorly understood. We aimed to quantify the uptake and recovery of N by a mixture of grasses when applied as either urea or oxamide in different diameter granules using a tracer technique (N-15). The effects of the N source on soil biomass, root density and amount of readily available organic C in soil were also evaluated. In a first experiment oxamide in 4-5 mm diameter granules was compared with urea. The initial N absorption, 40 days after fertilization (d.a.f.), was higher for urea (23.5%) than for oxamide (12.1%), but after 64 days absorption efficiencies were about the same (11%) for both fertilizers. Fertilizer-derived N lost by leaching was much greater from the urea-fertilized soil (1.57 g), compared with losses from oxamide-fertilized soil (0.05 g). The total residual fertilizer N remaining in the system at the end of the experiment was 26.7% of applied urea N and 39.6% of applied oxamide N. Cumulated absorption efficiencies, calculated after dismantling the lysimeters, were 43. 1 % for urea and 54.8% for oxamide (roots included). A priming effect caused by a larger uptake of soil N because of the better root development was found in the oxamide-treated lysimeter. Fertilization with oxamide also caused an increase in the amount of soil microbial biomass. In a second experiment, the efficiencies and fertilizer N uptake rates from oxamide applied at two different granule sizes (1-2 mm and 5-10 mm) were evaluated. The amount of soil N taken up by the grass was linearly related to root density (r = 0.92)
Pedogenic evolution and 137-Cs contents in soils of the eastern Alps (Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy)
No full textMINER. PETR. ACT
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Application of an early monitoring tool to assess the effects on soil microbial biomass of organic fertilizers and soil conditioners in different soils
No full text
- …
