1,720,995 research outputs found
Inhibition of SARS–CoV–2 NSP–15 by Uridine–5′–Monophosphate Analogues Using QSAR Modelling, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Free Energy Landscape
SARS–CoV–2 is accountable for severe social and economic disruption around the world causing COVID–19. Non–structural protein–15 (NSP15) possesses a domain that is vital to the viral life cycle and is known as uridylate–specific endoribonuclease (EndoU). This domain binds to the uridine 5′–monophosphate (U5P) so that the protein may carry out its native activity. It is considered a vital drug target to inhibit the growth of the virus. Thus, in this current study, ML–based QSAR and virtual screening of U5P analogues targeting Nsp15 were performed to identify potential molecules against SARS–CoV–2. Screening of 816 unique U5P analogues using ML–based QSAR identified 397 compounds ranked on their predicted bioactivity (pIC50). Further, molecular docking and hydrogen bond interaction analysis resulted in the selection of the top three compounds (53309102, 57398422, and 76314921). Molecular dynamics simulation of the most promising compounds showed that two molecules 53309102 and 57398422 acted as potential binders of Nsp15. The compound was able to inhibit nsp15 activity as it was successfully bound to the active site of the nsp15 protein. This was achieved by the formation of relevant contacts with enzymatically critical amino acid residues (His235, His250, and Lys290). Principal component analysis and free energy landscape studies showed stable complex formation while MM/GBSA calculation showed lower binding energies for 53309102 (ΔGTOTAL = –29.4 kcal/mol) and 57398422 (ΔGTOTAL = –39.4 kcal/mol) compared to the control U5P (ΔGTOTAL = –18.8 kcal/mol). This study aimed to identify analogues of U5P inhibiting the NSP15 function that potentially could be used for treating COVID–19
Structural stability-guided scaffold hopping and computational modeling of tankyrase inhibitors targeting colorectal cancer.
Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, mainly due to aberrant Wnt/β-catenin signaling resulting from APC mutations. Tankyrase is a key regulator of this pathway and plays a crucial role in stabilizing AXIN, a negative regulator of β-catenin, and hence an attractive therapeutic target. The present study describes a comprehensive computational approach to discovering novel tankyrase inhibitors for CRC therapy. The reference (RK-582) for ligand-based screening and comparative analysis was taken from the crystal structure of tankyrase. A similarity search in the PubChem, applying an 80% cutoff, yielded 533 structurally similar compounds. These compounds were subjected to virtual screening using a drug-likeness filter. The top-ranking binding poses of three selected compounds (PubChem CIDs: 138594346, 138594730, and 138594428) were selected for DFT calculation and re-docking. DFT calculations revealed that compound 138594428 had the largest HOMO-LUMO gap (4.979 eV), indicating high electronic stability, while 138594346 exhibited a strong balance of stability and reactivity (4.473 eV). The MD simulations were conducted on all ns protein-ligand complexes for 500 ns, exploring their stability. MD simulations confirmed the conformational stability of these compounds, with 138594346 showing the lowest RMSD and RMSF fluctuations. Additionally, a machine learning model trained on 236 known Tankyrase inhibitors accurately predicted pIC₅₀ values, with compound 138594346 (pIC₅₀ = 7.70) closely matching the reference inhibitor (pIC₅₀ = 7.71), and 138594428 also exhibiting strong predicted activity (pIC₅₀ = 7.41). Collectively, these results highlight 138594346 and 138594428 as promising candidates for further experimental validation in the development of targeted CRC therapeutics
Side Effects of Mixing Vaccines against COVID-19 Infection among Saudi Population
Background: Mixing two different vaccines has been utilized to minimize the impact of any supply chain interruptions and to combat the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. We conducted this study to evaluate the side effects, if any, associated with the mixed vaccination approach. Methods: An online survey study was administered among COVID-19 vaccine recipients in Saudi Arabia. Symptoms post vaccination were assessed in 311 vaccinated participants with two matched doses of either Oxford–AstraZeneca or Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines, or two mixed doses, respectively. Results: After the second dose, around 31% of the matched vaccine group reported no symptoms, while only 6% of the mixed vaccine group reported no symptoms. Most of the side effects after the second dose associated with matched vaccines were injection site pain (46%), while the mixed vaccines group reported significantly more symptoms compared with the matched vaccine group, which included fever (41%), fatigue (66%), muscle pain (44%), chills (17%) and injection site pain (60%). Conclusion: The data suggest the overall safety of the mixed vaccination protocol; however, it might be associated with side effects such as fever, fatigue, muscle pain, chills, and injection site pain. Further studies with a larger cohort size could shed more light on this aspect, which would be imperative for deciding to utilize a mixed vaccination approach
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
