1,721,082 research outputs found
Moffat, D K (Douglas Kenneth), NX44015
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/405585Surname: MOFFAT. Given Name(s) or Initials: D K (DOUGLAS KENNETH). Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX44015. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 39593.243668
Item: [2016.0049.37862] "Moffat, D K (Douglas Kenneth), NX44015
Management of the high jugular bulb in translabyrinthine surgery
No full textA thechnique used in the management of high jugular bull is presente
Semantic Music Production: A Meta-Study
No full textThis paper presents a systematic review of semantic music production, including a meta-analysis of three studies into how individuals use words to describe audio effects within music production. Each study followed different methodologies and stimuli. The SAFE project created audio effect plug-ins that allowed users to report suitable words to describe the perceived result. SocialFX crowdsourced a large data set of how non-professionals described the change that resulted from an effect applied to an audio sample. The Mix Evaluation Data Set performed a series of controlled studies in which students used natural language to comment extensively on the content of different mixes of the same groups of songs. The data sets provided 40,411 audio examples and 7,221 unique word descriptors from 1,646 participants. Analysis showed strong correlations between various audio features, effect parameter settings, and semantic descriptors. Meta-analysis not only revealed consistent use of descriptors among the data sets but also showed key differences that likely resulted from the different participant groups and tasks. To the authors' knowledge, this represents the first meta-study and the largest-ever analysis of music production semantics
Audiologic Presentation of Cerebellopontine Angle Cholesteatoma
No full textObjective: The aim of this study was to examine the audiologic presentation of patients with cerebellopontine angle (CPA) cholesteatoma. Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: Neuro-otologic tertiary referral centre. Methods: The study population consisted of 11 patients with CPA cholesteatomas. The patients underwent a standard audiologic investigation in the preoperative setting, which consisted of pure-tone audiometry, speech audiometry, and auditory brainstem response (ABR). Main Outcome Measures: The audiologic parameters that were analyzed were the pure-tone threshold, pure-tone average (PTA), and speech discrimination scores (SDSs). The morphology and latency of the ABR were evaluated. In addition, the clinical and radiologic presentations of the lesions were reviewed. Results: The mean PTA in the diseased ear was 22.6 dB HL (SD 18.2), whereas in the contralateral ear, it was 19.1 dB HL (SD 19.6). In 4 patients, the hearing loss was asymmetric, with the diseased ear being the worse ear. The mean SDS was 82.28% in the affected ear and 95.28% in the contralateral ear. ABR was abnormal in 9 of 10 cases (90%), with only the affected ear being abnormal in 4 cases. In the other 5 cases, the ABR was bilaterally abnormal. Conclusions: CPA cholesteatomas are very slow-growing lesions that involve the eighth cranial nerve. The paucity and insidious onset of symptoms mean that the diagnosis is often late, permitting the lesions to reach impressive dimensions at the time of diagnosis. Although magnetic resonance imaging represents the gold standard in the diagnosis of these lesions, ABR proved to be of value in the assessment of the auditory pathway, especially in those patients referred with a vague symptomatology and with normal hearing
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
