1,720,963 research outputs found
Systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma is more aggressive in children than in adults
Objectives: To compare the clinical and laboratory features of paediatric SSc sine scleroderma (ssJSSc) with adult-onset ssSSc. Methods: Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of ssJSSc, retrospectively retrieved from our hospital medical records, case reports from the literature and from the Pediatric Rheumatology European Society JSSc registry, were compared with the Padua cohort of adult patients with ssSSc. Patients were defined as having ssSSc if they never had skin involvement but all the following features: (i) RP and/or digital vasculopathy, (ii) positive ANA, (iii) internal organs involvement typical of scleroderma and (iv) no other defined CTD. Results: Eighteen juvenile and 38 adult-onset ssSSc patients, mean disease duration 5.8 and 9.7 years, respectively, entered the study. The frequency of females affected was significantly lower in ssJSSc (38.9% vs 89.5%, P < 0.0001). When compared with adults, ssJSSc displayed fewer SSc-specific capillaroscopy abnormalities (68.8% vs 94.7%, P = 0.02) while having significantly higher vascular (digital pitting scars, ulcers 35.3% vs 10.5%, P = 0.042), respiratory (50.0% vs 23.7%, P = 0.02) and cardiac (50.0% vs 2.6%, P < 0.0001) involvement. The outcome was significantly worse in ssJSSc as six patients (33%) died (n = 3) or reached an end-stage organ failure (n = 3) in comparison with only two deaths (5.3%) in the adult cohort. ACA were significantly lower in children (20.0% vs 68.4%, P = 0.001) while no difference was noted for other SSc-specific autoantibodies. Conclusion: Compared with adults where ssSSc generally has an indolent course, children present with aggressive disease that heralds a worse prognosis characterized by high cardiorespiratory morbidity and mortality
Primordial and primary prevention in rheumatological diseases: The time has come
: Rheumatological, immune-mediated diseases (RDs) impose a substantial global burden, especially on women of working age, resulting in chronic disability and escalating healthcare utilisation. Despite therapeutic advances, the incidence of RDs is rising, and no definitive cure exists. Emerging evidence highlights the potential of early-stage interventions, such as addressing preclinical phases of diseases to delay or prevent disease onset. Modifiable risk factors, such as tobacco use, obesity, diet, infections, mechanical strain, and other environmental exposures (e.g., air pollution and ultraviolet radiation), offer clear targets for intervention. Despite increasing efforts in producing high-quality studies for each rheumatological condition, current evidence supports the global promotion of a healthy lifestyle with a balanced diet, regular physical activity and vaccinations, vitamin D supplementation, and minimisation of excessive infectious, mechanical and psychosocial strain. However, to stimulate stakeholders and policymakers in investing and developing strategies for primary prevention, further interventional trials are warranted on at-risk populations such as first-degree relatives of rheumatological patients and asymptomatic autoantibody carriers. Indeed, besides encouraging experiments in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis, where research has reached the adolescent stage, research in disease interception is still in its infancy for most rheumatological conditions
Autoantibodies Targeting G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: Pathogenetic, Clinical and Therapeutic Implications in Systemic Sclerosis
:Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multifaceted connective tissue disease whose aetiology remains largely unknown. Autoimmunity is thought to play a pivotal role in the development of the disease, but the direct pathogenic role of SSc-specific autoantibodies remains to be established. The recent discovery of functional antibodies targeting G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), whose presence has been demonstrated in different autoimmune conditions, has shed some light on SSc pathogenesis. These antibodies bind to GPCRs expressed on immune and non-immune cells as their endogenous ligands, exerting either a stimulatory or inhibitory effect on corresponding intracellular pathways. Growing evidence suggests that, in SSc, the presence of anti-GPCRs antibodies correlates with specific clinical manifestations. Autoantibodies targeting endothelin receptor type A (ETAR) and angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) are associated with severe vasculopathic SSc-related manifestations, while anti-C-X-C motif chemokine receptors (CXCR) antibodies seem to be predictive of interstitial lung involvement; anti-muscarinic-3 acetylcholine receptor (M3R) antibodies have been found in patients with severe gastrointestinal involvement and anti-protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) antibodies have been detected in patients experiencing scleroderma renal crisis. This review aims to clarify the potential pathogenetic significance of GPCR-targeting autoantibodies in SSc, focusing on their associations with the different clinical manifestations of scleroderma. An extensive examination of functional autoimmunity targeting GPCRs might provide valuable insights into the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of SSc, thus enabling the development of novel therapeutic strategies tailored to target GPCR-mediated pathways
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
