1,720,953 research outputs found
A comparative analysis of the medicine use and exposures in infants who are HIV exposed uninfected and HIV unexposed uninfected in the first year in Cape Town, South Africa
No full textBackground: Despite several studies investigating medicine exposures in infants, the administration and monitoring of medications in infants who are HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU), a growing population, remains poorly studied. This study aimed to describe and compare medication consumption patterns, including immunization coverage, between infants who are HEU and HIV-unexposed uninfected (HUU) during their first year of life. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a birth cohort study of pregnant women living with and without HIV and their infants between 2017 and 2019 in Cape Town, South Africa. Interviewer- administered questionnaires captured sociodemographic factors, self-reported medication use, infant feeding practices, and vaccine use over four postnatal visits (<7 days, 10 weeks, 6 and 12 months). Data was manually classified and coded by a clinical pharmacist and student. Logistic regression models were employed to compare patterns of use among infants who are HEU and HUU, as well as identify other maternal and infant factors associated with medication use and vaccine coverage. Findings: A total of 772 mother-infant pairs were analyzed. Compared to infants who are HUU, HEU infants were preterm (64/393 vs. 39/379; p = 0.02), less often breastfed (314/393 vs. 322/379; p <0.001), and weighed less (median, 3288g vs. 3405 g; p = 0.03). HEU infants were found to take at least one medication at a significantly higher rate 388/393 (98.7%) vs 345/379 (91.0%) than infants who are HUU (p <0.001). HEU infants reported lower use of over-the-counter (OTC) medicine (69.2% vs. 80.2%; p <0.01) and traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) (16.8% vs. 26.1%; p <0.001) compared to HUU infants. Mothers of HEU infants were less likely to forget a medicine's name (29.3% vs. 36.9%, p<0.001) than HUU mothers. Prescription medicine use, excluding antiretroviral (ARV) prophylaxis medicines routinely administered to infants who are HEU at birth, was significantly higher among infants who are HEU compared to HUU (65.4%. vs. 23.0%; p <0.01). Vaccine coverage showed no significant difference between infants who are HEU and HUU but steadily declined over the year (95.0% coverage with birth immunizations, vs 70.0% at 9 months) across the entire cohort. Only 293 infants (38.0%) had complete immunization coverage at 1 year. In the adjusted models, being a HEU infant was a protective factor against self-medication. (aOR 0.45; 95% CI 0.31 –0.65; p <0.001). Conversely, being breastfed (aOR 2.46; 95% CI 1.56 –3.83; p <0.001) was a significant risk factor for self-medication infants. Prescription medicine use (excluding ARV prophylaxis medicines) was significantly associated with increased maternal age (aOR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03 – 1.08; p <0.001) and infants who are HEU (aOR 6.52; 95% CI 4.66 – 9.21; p <0.001). No significant associations were found between maternal and infant characteristics and full vaccine coverage. Interpretation: The study revealed that infants who are HEU were more exposed to prescribed medicine (excluding ARV prophylaxis medicines) compared to their HUU counterparts, however, mothers of HUU infants, generally reported higher usage of both TCAM and OTC compared to HEU infants. The study also revealed drops in vaccine coverage rates among infants over the first year of life, indicating a gap in protection against vaccine-preventable diseases. Further research is needed to study medication patterns in different settings. Medication literacy efforts need to be prioritized in pregnant women and mothers of newborns to support rational and safe medicine (including vaccine) usage and subsequently improve the health outcomes for all infants, irrespective of HIV status
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Author Under Sail The Imagination of Jack London, 1893-1902
No full textIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Spirit Truth -- 2. From Absorption to Theatricality and Back Again -- 3. "I Will Build a New Present" -- 4. Sons as Authors -- 5. Fathers as Publishers -- 6. The Daughter as Author -- 7. Lovers as Authors -- 8. At Sea with the Family -- 9. Yellow News, Yellow Stories -- 10. The Return Home -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About Jay WilliamsIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
- …
