1,760,707 research outputs found
Conférence de M. Kesao Miyamoto
No full textMiyamoto Kesao. Conférence de M. Kesao Miyamoto. In: École pratique des hautes études, Section des sciences religieuses. Annuaire. Tome 105, 1996-1997. 1996. pp. 153-158
Wilken & Miyamoto (2019)
No full textMaterials and Data from Wilken, B., & Miyamoto, Y. (2019). Protestant and Buddhist differences in noninfluence strategies of emotion regulation and their links to depressive symptoms. Emotion
Interview with Susan Minami Miyamoto
No full textInterview conducted in English.Interview conducted at Lānaʻi City, Lānaʻi.Susan Miyamoto was born in 1919 in Pāʻia, Maui, where her father, Jusaku Minami, an immigrant from Kumamoto-ken, Japan, worked at the sugar mill. He also grew and sold watermelons. Her mother, Fujiyo Minami, gave birth to ten children, seven of whom survived beyond early childhood. The Minami family, composed of mother, father, grandmother, and seven children, were residents of Lānaʻi, beginning in 1924. They lived in Namba Camp, then Crusher Camp, and finally Lānaʻi City. Jusaku Minami’s first job on Lānaʻi was with a crew of workers building a stone wall at Kaumālapaʻu. Later, he rose from field worker to foreman of women field workers. He also grew and sold vegetables. Susan Miyamoto attended Lānaʻi High and Elementary School until the tenth grade. In 1938, she completed the eleventh and twelfth grades at McKinley High School on Oʻahu. Returning to Lānaʻi that same year, she began office work at Lānaʻi Hospital. In 1972, she retired as office manager. She and her husband, Sadao, raised five children
Mr. Lou Haruo Miyamoto
No full textA statement by Mr. Lou Haruo Miyamoto. Information on the oral history project is found in: csuf_stp_0012A; Glossary in: csuf_stp_0014.A Japanese American oral history project undertaken in 1979-1980, funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities and archived at the Fresno County Public Library
Nephrolepis pseudobiserrata Hovenkamp PH & Miyamoto F 2005, hybr. nov.
No full text26. Nephrolepis × pseudobiserrata Miyam., hybr. nov. N. biserrata × N. brownii.Planta hybrida, differt ab N. biserrata sqamis stipitis et rachibus ovato-lanceolatis valde numerosis adpressis margine ciliatis, pinnis basibus supernis auriculatis; ab N. brownii soris submargine, indusis majus rotund-reniformibus, pinnis inferior vix reductis, textura laminae coriaceior. - Typus: Miyamoto & Nakayama 1444 (holo TUAT; iso BISH, BM, K, MICH, NY, TAI), Ryukyu Islands,11 March 1985. Plants epiphytic or terrestrial. Rhizome erect to ascending, scales densely set, narrowly ovate, 6-9 by 1.8- 2 mm, dark-brown, lustrous, margin densely ciliate. Stipes 30-50 cm long; basal scales appressed, narrowly ovate, 5-7 by 1.3- 2 mm, centrally dark-brown, lustrous, margin, pale brown, ciliate. Lamina lanceolate; pinnae 40-70 pairs, linear, 3-12 by 1-2.5 cm, margin dentate, acroscopic base auriculate, basiscopic base rounded or cuneate. Indument. Rachis scales dense, appressed, 2-4 by 0.3-0.4 mm.Sori submarginal, indusia round-reniforme. Spores abortive. Distribution - Ryukyu Islands, but may be found elsewhere as a result of the expansion of the range of N. brownii. Specimens examined: JAPAN. Ryukyu Islands:Ishigaki Isl.,Sukieda-Yoshihara, 30 m:Miyamoto & Nakayama 1444, 11 March 1985;Miyamoto & Nakayama 1443, 1446, 1447, 1449-1451, 1454 (all BISH, BM, MICH, NY, TAI, TUAT);Ishigaki Isl.,Ishigaki city,Mt Banna-dake,80-100 m,Miyamoto & Nakayama1189-1203 (TUAT).Published as part of Hovenkamp PH & Miyamoto F, 2005, A conspectus of the native and naturalized species of Nephrolepis (Nephrolepidaceae) in the world, pp. 279-322 in Blumea 50 on pages 313-31
Ezotinorchestia solifuga Morino & Miyamoto 2016, comb. nov.
No full textEzotinorchestia solifuga (Iwasa, 1939) comb. nov. [Japanese name: Kita-okatobimushi] (Figs 1–3) Orchestia solifuga Iwasa, 1939: 271–273, fig. 12, pl. 14;? Sidorov and Barabanschikov 2010: 71–73, figs 1–5. Non Orchesita traskiana Stimpson, 1857: Bulycheva 1957: 166, fig. 60. “ Parorchestia ” solifuga (Iwasa, 1939): Bousfield 1984: 207. Non Platorchestia solifuga (Iwasa, 1939): Miyamoto 1984: 3. “ Orchestia ” solifuga Iwasa, 1939: Morino et al. 2009: 26; Morino 2015: 1076 (fig. 1), 1087. Material examined. Male 12.9 mm (NSMT-Cr 24220), male 12.4 mm (NSMT-Cr 24219), female 13.3 mm (NSMT-Cr 24221), male, 3 ovig. females, and 2 females (NSMT-Cr 24222), 8 males and 71 females (H. Miyamoto collection); Utoro, Abashiri (base of a cliff, under litter); 1 August 1988; H. Miyamoto coll. Female 12.4 mm (NSMT-Cr 24217), 2 males, 2 ovig. females, and 3 females (NSMT-Cr 24218), 14 males and 9 females (H. Miyamoto collection); On-neto, Nemuro (forest of a shrine, under litter); 2 August 1988; H. Miyamoto coll. 2 females (NSMT-Cr 24223), 5 males and 24 females (H. Miyamoto collection); Rausu (near entrance of the Nature Park, floor of birch forest); 1 August 1988; H. Miyamoto coll. Male 9.2 mm (NSMT-Cr 24224), ovig. female 9.2 mm (NSMT-Cr 24225), ovig. female (NSMT-Cr 24226), 2 males and 2 females (NSMT-Cr 24227); Senhoshi, Rishiri Is. (Picea and Abies forest, 25 m alt.); 31 July 2007; M. Sato and K. Ishii coll. Male and juvenile (NSMT-Cr 24228); Kafukai, Rebun Is. (Abies forest, 20 m alt.); 31 May 2007; H. Miyamoto and K. Ishii coll. Description of male (NSMT-Cr 24220, 12.9 mm). Antenna 1 (Fig. 1A, B) with peduncular article 3 distinctly longer than either article 1 or 2; flagellum with 6 articles. Antenna 2 (Fig. 1A), peduncular article 5 subequal to articles 3 and 4 combined in length, flagellum with 19 articles. Mouthparts (Figs 1C, D, 2 A–F) as in generic diagnosis. Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 2G) with merus bearing small pellucid lobe, carpus ca. 1.3 times as long as propodus, with prominent pellucid lobe, propodus with submarginal row of 6 robust setae, surface of anterodistal corner scabrous (Fig. 2H). Gnathopod 2 (Fig. 2I) with propodus distally smoothly broadened, palm smooth, as long as posterior margin, dactylus weakly attenuate. Locking robust setae of pereopods 3–7 reduced (Fig. 3 A–E). Dactylus of pereopod 4 pinched (Fig. 3B). Bases of pereopods 5–7 (Fig. 1A) shallowly rounded posteriorly. Merus and carpus of pereopod 7 slender, similar to those of pereopod 6. Pleonite side plates (Fig. 3F) weakly acuminate posteriorly, with several setae on posterior margins. Peduncles of pleopods 1–3 (Fig. 3 G–I) with facial and marginal robust setae, occasionally with plumose setae; rami developed, with ca. 8 articles, 0.98, 0.96, and 1.06 times as long as respective peduncles. Uropod 1 (Fig. 3J) with peduncle bearing 5 outer, 3 and 1 tiny inner marginal robust setae; outer ramus with 4 marginal robust setae, inner ramus with 4 outer and 4 dorsomarginal robust setae. Uropod 2 (Fig. 3K) with peduncle bearing 4 outer marginal and 6 inner-medial marginal robust setae, outer ramus with 3 marginal robust setae, inner ramus with 3 outer marginal (distalmost one closely set to apical robust setae) and 2 dorsomarginal robust setae. Uropod 3 (Fig. 3L) with peduncle bearing 7 robust setae from dorsal to ventrodistal margin, ramus short, 0.71 times as long as peduncle, with 5 marginal and ca. 8 distal setae. Telson (Fig. 3M) with 10–11 robust setae per lobe. Description of female (NSMT-Cr 24221, 13.3 mm). Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 2J) with carpus ca. 1.5 times as long propodus, propodus lacking scabrous surface. Gnathopod 2 (Fig. 2K) with basis almost parallel-sided, merus with small lobe with scabrous surface, propodus with ca. 4 submarginal setae. Oostegites of pereopods 2 and 5 respectively with 25 and 13 simple-tipped marginal setae (Fig. 3N, O, P). Distribution. The present species is terrestrial and was collected from under litter of coastal forests of eastern Hokkaido and islands off northern Hokkaido (Fig. 4). The original description was based on the material from Akkeshi near Kushiro, in Hokkaido (Iwasa 1939). Remarks. The present material accords well with the original description given by Iwasa (1939), except for the number of robust setae on the telson. Five specimens examined in the present study with body lengths of 9.2–12.9mm bear 8–12 robust setae per lobe whereas the material from Akkeshi displays 5–6 robust setae (Iwasa 1939: pl. 14, fig. x). Although the body length of the depicted specimen was not specified by Iwasa (1939), the difference in the number of setae is very likely related to body size, since the variation in the number of the setae among the five specimens grossly parallels their body length. The gnathopod 1 of male in this species exhibits a prominent pellucid lobe on the carpus, and the scabrous surface on anterodistal part of the propodus, both of which could be additional generic diagnoses. Sidorov and Barabanschikov (2010) described a female of Orchestia solifuga from “subsurface” water of the Samarga River estuary, northern Primorye, Russia, but the depigmented body, diffuse ocelli, elongate mandible, and peculiar robust setae on the posterior margin of the merus-carpus of pereopod 3 of the Russian material strongly suggest they actually had a different species. Proper generic allocation of this specimen requires further examination of the gnathopods of the males. In terrestrial coastal habitats in Hokkaido, Kokuborchestia kokuboi (Uéno, 1929), Ditmorchestia ditmari (Derzhavin, 1923), and Ezotinorchestia solifuga occur. Kokuborchestia kokuboi is found in the southeast (Morino and Miyamoto 2015a) whereas E. solifuga inhabits the northern to eastern coast (Fig. 4). Ditmorchestia ditmari is confined to a small area in the east (Morino and Miyamoto 2015b), possibly representing the southern-most population of this species, which ranges north to Kamchatka. The reproductive season of the Rishiri population is estimated to be from July to September, and the egg number per female is around 14 (Morino et al. 2009).Published as part of Morino, Hiroshi & Miyamoto, Hisashi, 2016, Description of a New Talitrid Genus, Ezotinorchestia with a Redescription of E. solifuga (Iwasa, 1939) comb. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Talitridae), pp. 65-70 in Species Diversity 21 (1) on pages 67-69, DOI: 10.12782/sd.21.1.065, http://zenodo.org/record/458503
Nephrolepis hippocrepicis Hovenkamp PH & Miyamoto F 2005, hybr. nov.
No full text23. Nephrolepis × hippocrepicis Miyam.,hybr. nov. Planta hybrida, differt ab N. cordifolia squamis stipitis margine ciliatis lineo-lanceolatis; ab N. biserrata pinnis triangularis, supernis latis auriculatis, indusis lunulatis vel reniformis. Sporae abnormales et abortivae. - Typus: Miyamoto & Nakayama s.n. (holo TUAT; iso B, BISH, BM, K, MICH, NY, P, TAI), Ryukyu Islands,5 March 1985. Distribution - Ryukyu Islands, possibly elsewhere where the two putative parents occur together. Note - Putative hybrid between Nephrolepis cordifolia and N. biserrata.This hybrid is very similar to N. exaltata, and one specimen was in fact identifed by Nauman as such. However, N. exaltata does not occur in Asia. Nephrolepis hippocrepicis can be distinguished from N. biserrata by the distinctly triangular pinnae with auriculate acroscopic base, from N. cordifolia by the narrower sinus of the indusia and the ciliate stipe scales. The spores of all specimens examined are abnormal. A specimen with a somewhat similar morphology was collected in Thailand (Umaporn Intern s.n.1999, Doi Sutep near Puping Palace,L). Specimens examined: JAPAN. Ryukyu Islands:Okinawa Island,Yona Exp. Forest of Ryukyu Univ. Yona,Kunigamison, 100-200 m:Miyamoto & Nakayama s.n.,5 March 1985,Miyamoto & Nakayama 1407, 1408, 1409, 1412, 1413, 1414 (TUAT);Iwatsuki et al. s.n. (KYO);Miyako Island,Ohgami: Miyagi et al. s.n. (KYO).Published as part of Hovenkamp PH & Miyamoto F, 2005, A conspectus of the native and naturalized species of Nephrolepis (Nephrolepidaceae) in the world, pp. 279-322 in Blumea 50 on pages 312-31
Miyamoto Musashi's Character Analysis in Literature
No full textBakalaura darba tēma ir “Mijamoto Musaši tēla analīze literatūrā”. Darbā tiek rakstīts par Mijamoto Musaši vēsturi un viņa atspoguļojumu literatūrā. Pirmā daļa veltīta Mijamoto Musaši dzīves aprakstam, apkopota un izklāstīta informācija par viņa biogrāfiju, cīņām, sasniegumiem, filozofiju un mācībām. Tādā veidā darba autors spēs izprast Mijamoto kā vēsturisku personību, kas palīdzēs tālākai tēla analīzei, lai uzzinātu, cik precīzs ir tēla atainojums mūsdienu literatūras darbos. Otrajā daļā uzmanība pievērsta diviem darbiem, kuros Mijamoto Musaši ir galvenais varonis – Eidži Jošikavas romānu “Musaši” un Takehiko Inoues mangu “Vagabond”. Šajā nodaļā darba autors veicis literatūras darbu sižeta apskatu un izpētījis tajos aprakstītos notikumus, tādā veidā secinot, kāds priekšstats par Mijamoto Musaši veidotos literāro darbu lasītājiem – vai tas ir atbilstošs patiesā samuraja dzīvei, vai tomēr Mijamoto kalpo vien kā tēls izdomātos notikumos. Darba mērķis ir izpētīt, kā Mijamoto Musaši tiek attēlots literatūrā un vai tas atbilst vēsturiski.The topic of the bachelor's thesis is "Miyamoto Musashi's Character Analysis in Literature". The first part is devoted to the biography of Miyamoto Musashi, summarizing and presenting the information about his biography, struggles, achievements, philosophy and teachings. In this way, the author of the thesis will be able to understand Miyamoto as a historical personality, which will help further analysis of the image to find out, how accurate the representation of the image in contemporary literary works. The second part focuses on two works in which Miyamoto Musashi is the main character - Eiji Yoshikawa's novel “Musashi” and Takehiko Inoue's manga “Vagabond.” In this part, the author reviews the plot of the literary works and studies the events described in them, thus concluding what the readers of the literary works created by Miyamoto Musashi - whether it corresponds to the life of a true samurai, or whether Miyamoto serves only as an image in fictional events. The main objective of the thesis is to explore how Miyamoto Musashi depicts literature and whether he fits historically
Ezotinorchestia Morino & Miyamoto 2016, gen. nov.
No full textGenus Ezotinorchestia gen. nov. [New Japanese name: Kita-okatobimushi zoku] Type species. Orchestia solifuga Iwasa, 1939. Diagnosis. Body size medium. Eyes medium. Antenna 1 elongate, reaching mid-point of peduncular article 5 of antenna 2, peduncle subequal to flagellum in length, peduncular article 3 longer than either article 1 or 2. Antenna 2 in male not incrassate, flagellum subequal to peduncle in length. Upper lip lacking robust setae. Lacinia of left mandible 4-dentate. In maxilliped, outer margin of precoxa not stepped, palp articles 2 and 3 broad and mediodistally lobate, article 4 reduced. Gnathopod 1 sexually dimorphic, male propodus deeply subchelate, carpus and propodus each with broad-based pellucid lobe, merus with small pellucid lobe, lateral surface of propodus with rows of submarginal and facial robust setae; in female, pellucid lobe or scabrous surface both absent, propodus palm vertical, shorter than dactylus. In gnathopod 2 of male, propodus powerfully subchelate, dactylus slightly attenuate; in female, mitten-shaped, basis weakly expanded anteroproximally, propodus with facial and submarginal setae on lateral surface. Pereopods cuspidactylate (bi-cuspate), locking robust setae of propodi reduced. Coxa of pereopod 4 as deep as wide. Posterior lobe of coxa of pereopod 6 smoothly curved. Pereopod 7 in male not sexually dimorphic. Coxal gills of pereopods 2 and 6 larger than those of pereopods 3–5, gill of pereopod 2 lobed, others convoluted, gill of pereopod 6 distally linguiform. Pleonite side plates lacking marginal pits; pleopodal peduncles with 2 retinacula, arrays of robust setae both marginally and facially, and well-developed rami. Uropod 1 with distolateral robust seta of peduncle shorter than subdistal one; inner ramus with outer and dorsal marginal robust setae, outer ramus with marginal robust setae. Uropod 2 with rami subequal in length and marginal robust setae in 1 or 2 rows. Uropod 3 with peduncle slightly expanded; ramus stout, shorter than peduncle. Telson wider than long, with dorsolateral, distolateral, and distal robust setae, 6–12 setae in total per lobe. Oostegites subovate, with numerous simple or slightly curve-tipped setae. Etymology. The generic name is a combination of the ancient name for the region of Hokkaido, Ezoti, and part of the generic name Orchestia. Remarks. There are three genera of terrestrial coastal talitrids in the northwest Pacific: Ezotinorchesita gen. nov., Kokuborchestia Morino and Miyamoto, 2015, and Ditmorchestia Morino and Miyamoto, 2015. They show several morphological similarities among themselves. Ezotinorchestia is close to Kokuborchestia in having 1) an elongate antenna 1, 2) a deeply subchelate and lobed merus-carpus in male gnathopod 1, 3) well-developed pleopods, 4) outer ramus of uropod 1 with robust setae marginally, 5) laterally to distally distributed robust setae on the telson, and 6) simple-tipped setae on the oostegites. However, Kokuborchestia displays: 1) a similar gnathopod 1 in both sexes, with a deep palm and lobed merus-carpus (vs. sexually dimorphic), 2) the coxal gill of pereopod 6 being broad and distally truncate (vs. distally linguiform), 3) densely setose (with plumose setae) peduncles of the pleopods (vs. with robust setae), and 4) the telson lobe with 5–6 robust setae (vs. 6–12). These are all regarded as generic difference. Ditmorchestia displays similarities to Ezotinorchestia in having: 1) a sexually dimorphic gnathopod 1, 2) a setose outer ramus of uropod 1(with robust setae), and 3) a setose telson lobe (also with robust setae). However, the shorter antenna 1, the produced basis of pereopod 7, the moderately reduced pleopods, and the robust ramus of uropod 3 in Ditmorchestia separate this genus from Ezotinorchestia. Males of Orchestia Leach, 1814, as redefined by Lowry and Fanini (2013), and Cryptorchestia Lowry and Fanini, 2013, distributed mostly in the North Atlantic, show similar features to the present new genus in having: 1) a deeply subchelate gnathopod 1, 2) well developed pleopods, and 3) robust setae on the outer ramus of uropod 1. In addition, the lobed merus of gnathopod 1 is shared by Cryptorchestia and the present genus, while a high number of robust setae on telson (7+) is common to Orchestia and the present genus. However, both Orchestia and Cryptorchestia are separable from Ezotinorchestia by the shorter antenna 1, which does not exceed the end of peduncular article 4 of antenna 2. It should also be noted that recent molecular analyses of Orchestia and related species from the Mediterranean and northeast Atlantic suggest polyphyly of the genus Orchestia (Pavesi et al. 2015). Future molecular studies with extended species sampling could lead to further revision of the diagnosis of Orchestia. Ezotinorchestia solifuga (Iwasa, 1939) comb. nov. [Japanese name: Kita-okatobimushi] (Figs 1–3) Orchestia solifuga Iwasa, 1939: 271–273, fig. 12, pl. 14;? Sidorov and Barabanschikov 2010: 71–73, figs 1–5. Non Orchesita traskiana Stimpson, 1857: Bulycheva 1957: 166, fig. 60. “ Parorchestia ” solifuga (Iwasa, 1939): Bousfield 1984: 207. Non Platorchestia solifuga (Iwasa, 1939): Miyamoto 1984: 3. “ Orchestia ” solifuga Iwasa, 1939: Morino et al. 2009: 26; Morino 2015: 1076 (fig. 1), 1087. Material examined. Male 12.9 mm (NSMT-Cr 24220), male 12.4 mm (NSMT-Cr 24219), female 13.3 mm (NSMT-Cr 24221), male, 3 ovig. females, and 2 females (NSMT-Cr 24222), 8 males and 71 females (H. Miyamoto collection); Utoro, Abashiri (base of a cliff, under litter); 1 August 1988; H. Miyamoto coll. Female 12.4 mm (NSMT-Cr 24217), 2 males, 2 ovig. females, and 3 females (NSMT-Cr 24218), 14 males and 9 females (H. Miyamoto collection); On-neto, Nemuro (forest of a shrine, under litter); 2 August 1988; H. Miyamoto coll. 2 females (NSMT-Cr 24223), 5 males and 24 females (H. Miyamoto collection); Rausu (near entrance of the Nature Park, floor of birch forest); 1 August 1988; H. Miyamoto coll. Male 9.2 mm (NSMT-Cr 24224), ovig. female 9.2 mm (NSMT-Cr 24225), ovig. female (NSMT-Cr 24226), 2 males and 2 females (NSMT-Cr 24227); Senhoshi, Rishiri Is. (Picea and Abies forest, 25 m alt.); 31 July 2007; M. Sato and K. Ishii coll. Male and juvenile (NSMT-Cr 24228); Kafukai, Rebun Is. (Abies forest, 20 m alt.); 31 May 2007; H. Miyamoto and K. Ishii coll. Description of male (NSMT-Cr 24220, 12.9 mm). Antenna 1 (Fig. 1A, B) with peduncular article 3 distinctly longer than either article 1 or 2; flagellum with 6 articles. Antenna 2 (Fig. 1A), peduncular article 5 subequal to articles 3 and 4 combined in length, flagellum with 19 articles. Mouthparts (Figs 1C, D, 2 A–F) as in generic diagnosis. Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 2G) with merus bearing small pellucid lobe, carpus ca. 1.3 times as long as propodus, with prominent pellucid lobe, propodus with submarginal row of 6 robust setae, surface of anterodistal corner scabrous (Fig. 2H). Gnathopod 2 (Fig. 2I) with propodus distally smoothly broadened, palm smooth, as long as posterior margin, dactylus weakly attenuate. Locking robust setae of pereopods 3–7 reduced (Fig. 3 A–E). Dactylus of pereopod 4 pinched (Fig. 3B). Bases of pereopods 5–7 (Fig. 1A) shallowly rounded posteriorly. Merus and carpus of pereopod 7 slender, similar to those of pereopod 6. Pleonite side plates (Fig. 3F) weakly acuminate posteriorly, with several setae on posterior margins. Peduncles of pleopods 1–3 (Fig. 3 G–I) with facial and marginal robust setae, occasionally with plumose setae; rami developed, with ca. 8 articles, 0.98, 0.96, and 1.06 times as long as respective peduncles. Uropod 1 (Fig. 3J) with peduncle bearing 5 outer, 3 and 1 tiny inner marginal robust setae; outer ramus with 4 marginal robust setae, inner ramus with 4 outer and 4 dorsomarginal robust setae. Uropod 2 (Fig. 3K) with peduncle bearing 4 outer marginal and 6 inner-medial marginal robust setae, outer ramus with 3 marginal robust setae, inner ramus with 3 outer marginal (distalmost one closely set to apical robust setae) and 2 dorsomarginal robust setae. Uropod 3 (Fig. 3L) with peduncle bearing 7 robust setae from dorsal to ventrodistal margin, ramus short, 0.71 times as long as peduncle, with 5 marginal and ca. 8 distal setae. Telson (Fig. 3M) with 10–11 robust setae per lobe. Description of female (NSMT-Cr 24221, 13.3 mm). Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 2J) with carpus ca. 1.5 times as long propodus, propodus lacking scabrous surface. Gnathopod 2 (Fig. 2K) with basis almost parallel-sided, merus with small lobe with scabrous surface, propodus with ca. 4 submarginal setae. Oostegites of pereopods 2 and 5 respectively with 25 and 13 simple-tipped marginal setae (Fig. 3N, O, P). Distribution. The present species is terrestrial and was collected from under litter of coastal forests of eastern Hokkaido and islands off northern Hokkaido (Fig. 4). The original description was based on the material from Akkeshi near Kushiro, in Hokkaido (Iwasa 1939). Remarks. The present material accords well with the original description given by Iwasa (1939), except for the number of robust setae on the telson. Five specimens examined in the present study with body lengths of 9.2–12.9mm bear 8–12 robust setae per lobe whereas the material from Akkeshi displays 5–6 robust setae (Iwasa 1939: pl. 14, fig. x). Although the body length of the depicted specimen was not specified by Iwasa (1939), the difference in the number of setae is very likely related to body size, since the variation in the number of the setae among the five specimens grossly parallels their body length. The gnathopod 1 of male in this species exhibits a prominent pellucid lobe on the carpus, and the scabrous surface on anterodistal part of the propodus, both of which could be additional generic diagnoses. Sidorov and Barabanschikov (2010) described a female of Orchestia solifuga from “subsurface” water of the Samarga River estuary, northern Primorye, Russia, but the depigmented body, diffuse ocelli, elongate mandible, and peculiar robust setae on the posterior margin of the merus-carpus of pereopod 3 of the Russian material strongly suggest they actually had a different species. Proper generic allocation of this specimen requires further examination of the gnathopods of the males. In terrestrial coastal habitats in Hokkaido, Kokuborchestia kokuboi (Uéno, 1929), Ditmorchestia ditmari (Derzhavin, 1923), and Ezotinorchestia solifuga occur. Kokuborchestia kokuboi is found in the southeast (Morino and Miyamoto 2015a) whereas E. solifuga inhabits the northern to eastern coast (Fig. 4). Ditmorchestia ditmari is confined to a small area in the east (Morino and Miyamoto 2015b), possibly representing the southern-most population of this species, which ranges north to Kamchatka. The reproductive season of the Rishiri population is estimated to be from July to September, and the egg number per female is around 14 (Morino et al. 2009). Ezotinorchestia solifuga (Iwasa, 1939) comb. nov. [Japanese name: Kita-okatobimushi] (Figs 1–3) Orchestia solifuga Iwasa, 1939: 271–273, fig. 12, pl. 14;? Sidorov and Barabanschikov 2010: 71–73, figs 1–5. Non Orchesita traskiana Stimpson, 1857: Bulycheva 1957: 166, fig. 60. “ Parorchestia ” solifuga (Iwasa, 1939): Bousfield 1984: 207. Non Platorchestia solifuga (Iwasa, 1939): Miyamoto 1984: 3. “ Orchestia ” solifuga Iwasa, 1939: Morino et al. 2009: 26; Morino 2015: 1076 (fig. 1), 1087. Material examined. Male 12.9 mm (NSMT-Cr 24220), male 12.4 mm (NSMT-Cr 24219), female 13.3 mm (NSMT-Cr 24221), male, 3 ovig. females, and 2 females (NSMT-Cr 24222), 8 males and 71 females (H. Miyamoto collection); Utoro, Abashiri (base of a cliff, under litter); 1 August 1988; H. Miyamoto coll. Female 12.4 mm (NSMT-Cr 24217), 2 males, 2 ovig. females, and 3 females (NSMT-Cr 24218), 14 males and 9 females (H. Miyamoto collection); On-neto, Nemuro (forest of a shrine, under litter); 2 August 1988; H. Miyamoto coll. 2 females (NSMT-Cr 24223), 5 males and 24 females (H. Miyamoto collection); Rausu (near entrance of the Nature Park, floor of birch forest); 1 August 1988; H. Miyamoto coll. Male 9.2 mm (NSMT-Cr 24224), ovig. female 9.2 mm (NSMT-Cr 24225), ovig. female (NSMT-Cr 24226), 2 males and 2 females (NSMT-Cr 24227); Senhoshi, Rishiri Is. (Picea and Abies forest, 25 m alt.); 31 July 2007; M. Sato and K. Ishii coll. Male and juvenile (NSMT-Cr 24228); Kafukai, Rebun Is. (Abies forest, 20 m alt.); 31 May 2007; H. Miyamoto and K. Ishii coll. Description of male (NSMT-Cr 24220, 12.9 mm). Antenna 1 (Fig. 1A, B) with peduncular article 3 distinctly longer than either article 1 or 2; flagellum with 6 articles. Antenna 2 (Fig. 1A), peduncular article 5 subequal to articles 3 and 4 combined in length, flagellum with 19 articles. Mouthparts (Figs 1C, D, 2 A–F) as in generic diagnosis. Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 2G) with merus bearing small pellucid lobe, carpus ca. 1.3 times as long as propodus, with prominent pellucid lobe, propodus with submarginal row of 6 robust setae, surface of anterodistal corner scabrous (Fig. 2H). Gnathopod 2 (Fig. 2I) with propodus distally smoothly broadened, palm smooth, as long as posterior margin, dactylus weakly attenuate. Locking robust setae of pereopods 3–7 reduced (Fig. 3 A–E). Dactylus of pereopod 4 pinched (Fig. 3B). Bases of pereopods 5–7 (Fig. 1A) shallowly rounded posteriorly. Merus and carpus of pereopod 7 slender, similar to those of pereopod 6. Pleonite side plates (Fig. 3F) weakly acuminate posteriorly, with several setae on posterior margins. Peduncles of pleopods 1–3 (Fig. 3 G–I) with facial and marginal robust setae, occasionally with plumose setae; rami developed, with ca. 8 articles, 0.98, 0.96, and 1.06 times as long as respective peduncles. Uropod 1 (Fig. 3J) with peduncle bearing 5 outer, 3 and 1 tiny inner marginal robust setae; outer ramus with 4 marginal robust setae, inner ramus with 4 outer and 4 dorsomarginal robust setae. Uropod 2 (Fig. 3K) with peduncle bearing 4 outer marginal and 6 inner-medial marginal robust setae, outer ramus with 3 marginal robust setae, inner ramus with 3 outer marginal (distalmost one closely set to apical robust setae) and 2 dorsomarginal robust setae. Uropod 3 (Fig. 3L) with peduncle bearing 7 robust setae from dorsal to ventrodistal margin, ramus short, 0.71 times as long as peduncle, with 5 marginal and ca. 8 distal setae. Telson (Fig. 3M) with 10–11 robust setae per lobe. Description of female (NSMT-Cr 24221, 13.3 mm). Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 2J) with carpus ca. 1.5 times as long propodus, propodus lacking scabrous surface. Gnathopod 2 (Fig. 2K) with basis almost parallel-sided, merus with small lobe with scabrous surface, propodus with ca. 4 submarginal setae. Oostegites of pereopods 2 and 5 respectively with 25 and 13 simple-tipped marginal setae (Fig. 3N, O, P). Distribution. The present species is terrestrial and was collected from under litter of coastal forests of eastern Hokkaido and islands off northern Hokkaido (Fig. 4). The original description was based on the material from Akkeshi near Kushiro, in Hokkaido (Iwasa 1939). Remarks. The present material accords well with the original description given by Iwasa (1939), except for the number of robust setae on the telson. Five specimens examined in the present study with body lengths of 9.2–12.9mm bear 8–12 robust setae per lobe whereas the material from Akkeshi displays 5–6 robust setae (Iwasa 1939: pl. 14, fig. x). Although the body length of the depicted specimen was not specified by Iwasa (1939), the difference in the number of setae is very likely related to body size, since the variation in the number of the setae among the five specimens grossly parallels their body length. The gnathopod 1 of male in this species exhibits a prominent pellucid lobe on the carpus, and the scabrous surface on anterodistal part of the propodus, both of which could be additional generic diagnoses. Sidorov and Barabanschikov (2010) described a female of Orchestia solifuga from “subsurface” water of the Samarga River estuary, northern Primorye, Russia, but the depigmented body, diffuse ocelli, elongate mandible, and peculiar robust setae on the posterior margin of the merus-carpus of pereopod 3 of the Russian material strongly suggest they actually had a different species. Proper generic allocation of this specimen requires further examination of the gnathopods of the males. In terrestrial coastal habitats in Hokkaido, Kokuborchestia kokuboi (Uéno, 1929), Ditmorchestia ditmari (Derzhavin, 1923), and Ezotinorchestia solifuga occur. Kokuborchestia kokuboi is found in the southeast (Morino and Miyamoto 2015a) whereas E. solifuga inhabits the northern to eastern coast (Fig. 4). Ditmorchestia ditmari is confined to a small area in the east (Morino and Miyamoto 2015b), possibly representing the southern-most population of this species, which ranges north to Kamchatka. The reproductive season of the Rishiri population is estimated to be from July to September, and the egg number per female is around 14 (Morino et al. 2009).Published as part of Morino, Hiroshi & Miyamoto, Hisashi, 2016, Description of a New Talitrid Genus, Ezotinorchestia with a Redescription of E. solifuga (Iwasa, 1939) comb. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Talitridae), pp. 65-70 in Species Diversity 21 (1) on pages 65-69, DOI: 10.12782/sd.21.1.065, http://zenodo.org/record/458503
- …
