1,721,755 research outputs found
Fotografía UDBC020804
Fotografía del ejemplar Miranda, V. 28, determinado como Nasturtium officinal
Fotografía UDBC021261
Fotografía del ejemplar Miranda, V. 12, determinado como Gentianella corymbosa en el año 197
Fotografía UDBC021583
Fotografía del ejemplar Miranda, V. 50, determinado como Lupinus spragueanus en el año 201
Miranda v. Arizona: The Emerging Pattern
In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court set forth a series of specific guidelines to determine the admissibility at trial of statements elicited during police interrogation of a criminal suspect. Since 1971, the Burger Court has whittled away at the mandates of Miranda. It is possible that one major factor underlies this erosion process: the very frustrating reality that, in many situations, an obviously guilty party is allowed to go free because the constable has blundered
Interrogation of Criminal Defendants—Some Views on Miranda v. Arizona
The decision in Miranda v. Arizona is another of the United States Supreme Court\u27s major efforts directed at the protection of individual liberties. The tremendous controversy engendered by the decision prompted the Editorial Board to invite a number of scholars to express their views on the case. These remarks follow a digest of the opinion of the Court
Interrogation of Criminal Defendants—Some Views on Miranda v. Arizona
The decision in Miranda v. Arizona is another of the United States Supreme Court\u27s major efforts directed at the protection of individual liberties. The tremendous controversy engendered by the decision prompted the Editorial Board to invite a number of scholars to express their views on the case. These remarks follow a digest of the opinion of the Court
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
The Application of Miranda v. Arizona to Criminal Tax Investigations
In 1966 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), that a person in custody who is interrogated by officers regarding matters that might tend to incriminate him is entitled to be warned of certain rights that he has under the United States Constitution. In many instances the holding of this case is easily applied. However, the unique nature of criminal tax procedures has raised many questions regarding the application of the Miranda warnings to criminal tax investigations. This research project will analyze the questions raised and discuss the effect that the courts\u27 rulings have had on criminal tax investigations as well as the possible effects had the courts ruled differently. Following the introduction will be a discussion of the characteristics of criminal tax investigations that distinguish them from other types of investigations. It is these differences that have caused the courts to apply the decision of Miranda v. Arizona uniquely to criminal tax cases. Next will be an analysis of the requirements set down by the courts in various instances that have occurred during criminal tax investigations. An understanding of the courts\u27 rulings is essential to the comprehension of what is presently required of Special Agents in procedures outlined by the IRS. Finally, the conclusion will present comments .regarding the present procedures in place by the IRS that 1 ensures compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and Regulations without infringing upon the taxpayers\u27 constitutional rights under Miranda
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
