1,721,009 research outputs found
The Sonnet Stretcher
Abstract of paper 0775 presented at the Digital Humanities Conference 2019 (DH2019), Utrecht , the Netherlands 9-12 July, 2019
Like Two Pis in a Pod: Author Similarity in the Ancient Greek Corpus
One commonly recognized feature of the Ancient Greek corpus is that some later texts imitate and allude to model texts from earlier time periods, but analysis of this phenomenon is mostly done for specific author pairs based on close reading and highly visible instances of imitation. In this work, we use computational techniques to examine the similarity of a wide range of Ancient Greek authors, with a particular focus on similarity between authors writing many centuries apart. We represent texts and authors based on their usage of high-frequency words to capture author signatures rather than document topics. We propose the Jensen-Shannon Similarity metric for measuring similarity between authors and show that it outperforms other common metrics for vector comparison. We then use this similarity metric to analyze author similarity across distances in time, finding high similarity between specific authors and across the corpus that is not common to all languages. We analyze these similar author pairs more closely and find the similarity is the result of similar usage of many different words rather than just a few
Recommended from our members
Expertise Modeling for Matching Papers with Reviewers
An essential part of an expert-finding task, such as matching reviewers to submitted papers, is the ability to model the expertise of a person based on documents. We evaluate several measures of the association between an author in an existing collection of research papers and a previously unseen document. We compare two language model based approaches with a novel topic model, Author-Persona-Topic (APT). In this model, each author can write under one or more "personas," which are represented as independent distributions over hidden topics. Examples of previous papers written by prospective reviewers are gathered from the Rexa database, which extracts and disambiguates author mentions from documents gathered from the web. We evaluate the models using a reviewer matching task based on human relevance judgments determining how well the expertise of proposed reviewers matches a submission. We find that the APT topic model outperforms the other models
Recommended from our members
Topic Regression
Text documents are generally accompanied by non-textual information, such as authors, dates, publication sources, and, increasingly, automatically recognized named entities. Work in text analysis has often involved predicting these non-text values based on text data for tasks such as document classification and author identification. This thesis considers the opposite problem: predicting the textual content of documents based on non-text data. In this work I study several regression-based methods for estimating the influence of specific metadata elements in determining the content of text documents. Such topic regression methods allow users of document collections to test hypotheses about the underlying environments that produced those documents.Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.
T5 meets Tybalt: Author Attribution in Early Modern English Drama Using Large Language Models
Large language models have shown breakthrough potential in many NLP domains.
Here we consider their use for stylometry, specifically authorship
identification in Early Modern English drama. We find both promising and
concerning results; LLMs are able to accurately predict the author of
surprisingly short passages but are also prone to confidently misattribute
texts to specific authors. A fine-tuned t5-large model outperforms all tested
baselines, including logistic regression, SVM with a linear kernel, and cosine
delta, at attributing small passages. However, we see indications that the
presence of certain authors in the model's pre-training data affects predictive
results in ways that are difficult to assess.Comment: Published in CHR 202
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
