1,720,954 research outputs found
International Association of Geomorphologists - Newsletter n° 16 (2/1999)
Ota Yoko, Migon Piort. International Association of Geomorphologists - Newsletter n° 16 (2/1999). In: Géomorphologie : relief, processus, environnement, juin 1999, vol. 5, n°2. pp. 187-191
Geosite designation and geotourism development in the Karkonosze National Park, SW Poland
The Karkonosze Mts in SW Poland have been long appreciated for an outstanding scenery but nature conservation and interpretation emphasized biotic components. Recent initiatives bring geodiversity back in focus. The comprehensive assessment of geosites provided basis for designation of a national geopark in 2010 and results are now used to develop geotourism. Main means of communications include thematic trails, interpretation panels, popular science publications, and website. During geosite evaluation the buffer zone was shown to be of high value too. Promotion of its geoheritage may help to diversify tourist flows in the national park.Les montagnes de Karkonosze, au sud-ouest de la Pologne, sont appréciées depuis longtemps en raison de leurs paysages exceptionnels. Pourtant, les mesures de conservation de la nature mais également les outils de mise en valeur et d'interprétation insistent davantage sur les patrimoines vivants de ce massif. De récentes initiatives tentent de rétablir l'équilibre en focalisant à nouveau l'attention sur la géodiversité. Géologiquement, les Karkonosze sont constituées, au nord et à l'ouest, par une grande intrusion granitique d'âge carbonifère et au sud et à l'est par d'anciennes roches métamorphiques. L'histoire géomorphologique des Karkonosze est complexe, marquée principalement par l 'action des glaciations du Pléistocène. Les Karkonosze ont également une longue tradition minière et sont connues pour être l'une des principales localités minéralogiques des Sudètes. En 2008-2009, une évaluation globale de plus de 120 geosites a été effectuée fournissant des bases solides pour la désignation d'un géoparc national en 2010. Les géosites représentent divers thèmes géoscientifiques : pétrologie, minéralogie, tectonique, paléogéographie, géomorphologie et histoire de l'exploitation minière, et surtout les paysages géomorphologiques. Les résultats de cette évaluation sont maintenant utilisés pour développer le géotourisme. Les principales activités comprennent la mise en place de sentiers thématiques et de panneaux d'interprétation, mais également la préparation de publications de vulgarisation scientifique, et le développement d'un site web. Des problèmes se posent à l'interface avec la conservation de la nature, en particulier dans la zone de protection stricte car un certain nombre de sites géologiques précieux ne sont pas assez accessibles. D'autre part, la zone tampon possède de nombreux géopatrimoines de grande valeur dont la promotion peut contribuer à la diversification des flux touristiques dans le parc national.Migon Piotr, Knapik Roksana. Geosite designation and geotourism development in the Karkonosze National Park, SW Poland. In: Collection EDYTEM. Cahiers de géographie, numéro 15, 2013. Gestion des géosites dans les espaces protégés. pp. 57-63
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
