126,568 research outputs found

    F. B. Sévérac, Vladimir Soloviev. Introduction et choix de textes

    No full text
    Michalski C. F. B. Sévérac, Vladimir Soloviev. Introduction et choix de textes. In: Revue néo-scolastique de philosophie. 18ᵉ année, n°69, 1911. p. 143

    F. B. Sévérac, Vladimir Soloviev. Introduction et choix de textes

    No full text
    Michalski C. F. B. Sévérac, Vladimir Soloviev. Introduction et choix de textes. In: Revue néo-scolastique de philosophie. 18ᵉ année, n°69, 1911. p. 143

    Argiolestes tuberculiferus Michalski & Oppel 2010

    No full text
    Argiolestes tuberculiferus Michalski & Oppel 2010 Kalkman, V.J. RMNH Papua New Guinea 501972 25924702 KF369632 KF370030 KF369311 ODOPH008-13Published as part of Dijkstra, Klaas-Douwe B., Kalkman, Vincent J., Dow, Rory A., Stokvis, Frank R. & Tol, Jan Van, 2014, Redefining the damselfly families: a comprehensive molecular phylogeny of Zygoptera (Odonata). Supporting Information Table 2: List of analysed samples., pp. 1-10 in Systematic Entomology 39 (1) on page 1, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.665290

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    John Michalski, Billiken Soccer Club team member

    No full text
    SLU Billikens posed action shots. Pictured: John Michalski. (16 November 1960) [Photo by Father Luke, PHO 01.660.55

    Argiolestes tuberculiferus Michalski & Oppel 2010

    No full text
    Argiolestes tuberculiferus Michalski & Oppel 2010 Kalkman, V.J. RMNH Papua New Guinea 501972 25924702 KF369632 KF370030 KF369311 ODOPH008-13Published as part of Dijkstra, Klaas-Douwe B., Kalkman, Vincent J., Dow, Rory A., Stokvis, Frank R. & Tol, Jan Van, 2014, Redefining the damselfly families: a comprehensive molecular phylogeny of Zygoptera (Odonata). Supporting Information Table 2: List of analysed samples., pp. 1-10 in Systematic Entomology 39 (1) on page 1, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.665290

    John Michalski, Billiken Soccer Club team member

    No full text
    SLU Billikens posed action shots. Pictured: John Michalski. (16 November 1960) [Photo by Father Luke, PHO 01.660.57

    John Michalski, Billiken Soccer Club team member

    No full text
    SLU Billikens posed action shots. Pictured: John Michalski. (16 November 1960) [Photo by Father Luke, PHO 01.660.59

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore