1,721,492 research outputs found

    Michael Wright, 1970

    No full text
    CCAC faculty, Michael Wright, 1970

    Michael Wright and Malaquias Montoya, 1980

    No full text
    CCAC faculty, Malaquias Montoya at left and Michael Wright at right, April 1980

    Michael Wright in Nahl Hall, 1972

    No full text
    CCAC faculty Michael Wright, Dr. Michael Oshoosi Wright as of 2020, speaking in Nahl Hall on the CCAC Oakland Campus, 1972

    Jason Michael Wright v. State of Utah : Brief of Respondent

    Full text link
    An appeal from the Adoption of Jason Michael Wright from the Third Judicial District Court

    Jason Michael Wright v. State of Utah : Brief of Appellant

    Full text link
    An appeal from the Adoption of Jason Michael Wright from the Third Judicial District Court

    Phasa Thai kap Michael Wright thi kamlang ayu krop 20 pi boribun

    No full text
    The article is the autobiography of Michael Wright, a British writer who specializes in Thai history and prehistorical inscription

    Data from an Archaeological Evaluation at Michael Wright Way, Great Bentley, Essex, May 2023

    No full text
    This collection comprises images, a site plan, and site records from an archaeological evaluation undertaken by Colchester Archaeological Trust on land to the south of Michael Wright Way, Great Bentley, Essex in May 2023. Six trial-trenches were machine-excavated under the supervision of a CAT archaeologist. The archaeological evaluation was carried out in advance of the construction of six new dwelling

    Letter from Michael Wright to President Ford, Bob Forth and John Streetz

    No full text
    A letter to CCAC President Ford in which Michael Wright objects to the CCAC publication Spectrum's representation of Ethnic Studies, and to Spectrum editor Ken David's inclusion of such representations. The letter is accompanied by a clipping of a cartoon, published in Spectrum, that inspired Wright's letter

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore