1,721,414 research outputs found
Staaten als Täter
Get PDFDie Singularität der Ermordung der europäischen Juden durch das Deutsche Reich wirft die Frage auf, inwieweit und ab welchem Punkt sich die deutsche Entwicklung von der anderer Staaten in Europa abkoppelte. Michael Mayer vergleicht deshalb erstmals systematisch die „Judenpolitik“ des Deutschen Reichs mit der des zweitwichtigsten modernen Industriestaates auf dem Kontinent: Frankreich. Die Vichy-Regierung schwankte in ihrer Politik zwischen der Verwirklichung einer autochthonen Politik und der Anpassung an deutsche Forderungen. Mit Hilfe eines Vergleichs kann der Autor wichtige neue Antworten zur Struktur des NS-Staates und Vichy-Frankreichs sowie zu deren Politik gegenüber den Juden finden.
Michael Mayer, geboren 1974, ist wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter der Abteilung des Instituts für Zeitgeschichte im Auswärtigen Amt, Lehrbeauftragter an der Universität Potsdam und Vertrauensdozent der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
Akteure, Verbrechen und Kontinuitäten. Das Auswärtige Amt im Dritten Reich — Eine Binnendifferenzierung
No full textVorspann
Die verstörende publizistische Begleitmusik zum „Amt“ ist fast verstummt. Nun haben die Fachleute das Wort. Einer davon ist Michael Mayer, der die Debatte zum Anlass nimmt, sich intensiv mit der Personalstruktur des Außenministeriums im Dritten Reich und ihrem tiefgreifenden Wandel nach 1938 zu befassen. Sein Befund ist eindeutig: Es waren vor allem die neu geschaffenen, von überzeugten Nationalsozialisten geleiteten Sonderreferate, die im Auswärtigen Amt die Judenpolitik bestimmten und bereitwillig mit dem Reichssicherheitshauptamt kooperierten. Der Einfluss der alten Diplomaten in den traditionellen Abteilungen hingegen blieb in dieser Frage – trotz aller, mitunter bestürzender Anpassungsleistungen – gering.</jats:p
Ancestors and descendants of Michael Mayer, Biebesheim/Rhein.
No full textFamily tree of the Michael Mayer family. Contains memoir on Biebesheim. Also included are copies of photographs and vital records.The following families are mentioned in this collection:Bendheim family; Berliner family; Bibro family; Blum family; Blum family; Buschmeyer family; Caan family; Casella family; Cohen family; Edelmuth family; Feist family; Fenster family; Freudenstein family; Freund family; Gellmann family; Haas family; Hallstead family; Halstead family; Heimann family; Hochschild family; Hollaender family; Holzmann family; Kaiser family; Kaplan family; Klugmann family; Kolm family; Koppel family; Leinberger family; Lobl family; Loebl family; Loewensberg family; Loewenson family; Loewenstein family; Mayer family; Meyer family; Pfifer family; Pless family; Radezki family; Roos family; Rosenberger family; Rosenthal family; Seeger family; Steinweller family; Trow family.Mrs. I.H. Rosenberger, 1988.Griesheim. Alsbach.digitize
sj-docx-1-oss-10.1177_01708406231166815 – Supplemental material for Strategic Change in a Pluralistic Context: Change leader sensegiving
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-oss-10.1177_01708406231166815 for Strategic Change in a Pluralistic Context: Change leader sensegiving by Lisa Day, Julia Balogun and Michael Mayer in Organization Studies</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
