1,721,386 research outputs found
Hunting Robert Boyle: Michael Hunter and Boyle's life and letters
No full textEssay Review of the work of Professor Michael Hunter and his biography of Boyle: 'Boyle: between God and science' , 2009. ISBN 978-0300123814</p
Hunting Robert Boyle: Michael Hunter and Boyle's life and letters
No full textEssay Review of the work of Professor Michael Hunter and his biography of Boyle: 'Boyle: between God and science' , 2009. ISBN 978-0300123814</p
Review of Robert Boyle (1627-1691): Scrupulosity and science, Michael Hunter
No full textReview of Robert Boyle (1627-1691): Scrupulosity and Science, Michael Hunter
Michael Hunter (éd.), Robert Boyle reconsidered (Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994)
No full textDebus Allen G. Michael Hunter (éd.), Robert Boyle reconsidered (Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994). In: Revue d'histoire des sciences, tome 49, n°2-3, 1996. Théorie et pratique dans la construction des savoirs alchimiques. pp. 356-357
Review of "Boyle Studies. Aspects of the Life and Thought of Robert Boyle" by Michael Hunter.
No full textMichael Hunter. Boyle Studies. Aspects of the Life and Thought of Robert Boyle. Farnham, Surrey, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2015. xiv + 244 pp. ��63,00. Review by Alessandro Giostra, Deputazione di Storia Patria���Ancona
Review of Michael Hunter, The Boyle Papers: Understanding the Manuscripts of Robert Boyle (Ashgate, 2007)
No full textMichael Hunter, The Boyle Papers: Understanding the Manuscripts of Robert Boyle. With contributions by Edward B. Davis, Harriet Knight, Charles Littleton and Lawrence M. Principe. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2007. Pp. xiii + 674. US$139.95/£70.00 HB. The publication by Michael Hunter of this revised edition of the catalogue of the Boyle Papers contributes admirably to the renaissance in Boyle studies which has taken place over the past decade and a half. Robert Boyle (1627–91), arguably the most influential British scientist of the late seventeenth century, was a pioneering experimenter, profound thinker, and figure-head of the new science in its early years of development. This volume brings together the materials necessary for understanding the Boyle archive, one of the most important archives from this period, which has been at the Royal Society since 1769
¿Qué hacen los mejores profesores de derecho? de Michael Hunter Schwartz, Gerry F. Hess y Sophie M. Sparrow
Get PDFFil: Iud, Alan. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Cátedra Régimen del Proceso Penal. Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSección Reseña. -- ¿Que hacen los mejores profesores de derecho? de Michael Hunter Schwartz, Gerry F. Hess y Sophie M. Sparrow. Ed. Universidad de Palermo, Buenos Aires, 2018. Título original: What the Best Law Teachers Do, Harvard University Press, 2013
Michael Hunter, Science and Society in Restoration England Margaret C. Jacob, The Radical Enlightenment : Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans
No full textVienne Jean-Michel. Michael Hunter, Science and Society in Restoration England Margaret C. Jacob, The Radical Enlightenment : Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans. In: XVII-XVIII. Bulletin de la société d'études anglo-américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. N°16, 1983. pp. 114-115
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
