1,721,072 research outputs found
Supplemental Material - Motive-specific affective contingencies and their relevance for personality and motivated behavior
No full textSupplemental Material for Motive-specific affective contingencies and their relevance for personality and motivated behavior by Michael Dufner, Franziska Wieg, Livia Kraft, Stathis Grapsas, and Birk Hagemeyer in European Journal of Personality.</p
Supplemental_Material_SPPS_revision_final - The End of a Stereotype: Only Children Are Not More Narcissistic Than People With Siblings
No full textSupplemental_Material_SPPS_revision_final for The End of a Stereotype: Only Children Are Not More Narcissistic Than People With Siblings by Michael Dufner, Mitja D. Back, Franz F. Oehme and Stefan C. Schmukle in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p
list_of_relevant_studies – Supplemental material for Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review
No full textSupplemental material, list_of_relevant_studies for Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review by Michael Dufner, Jochen E. Gebauer, Constantine Sedikides, and Jaap J. A. Denissen in Personality and Social Psychology Review</p
Online_supplemental_material_final – Supplemental material for Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review
No full textSupplemental material, Online_supplemental_material_final for Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review by Michael Dufner, Jochen E. Gebauer, Constantine Sedikides, and Jaap J. A. Denissen in Personality and Social Psychology Review</p
supplement_material – Supplemental material for Seeing the Best or Worst in Others: A Measure of Generalized Other-Perceptions
No full textSupplemental material, supplement_material for Seeing the Best or Worst in Others: A Measure of Generalized Other-Perceptions by Richard Rau, Wiebke Nestler, Michael Dufner and Steffen Nestler in Assessment</p
sj-csv-2-psp-10.1177_01461672221107205 – Do Agency and Communion Explain the Relationship Between Perceiver and Target Effects in Interpersonal Perception? A Meta-Analysis on Generalized Reciprocity
No full textsj-csv-2-psp-10.1177_01461672221107205 for Do Agency and Communion Explain the Relationship Between Perceiver and Target Effects in Interpersonal Perception? A Meta-Analysis on Generalized Reciprocity by Titus Schauf, Michael Dufner, Steffen Nestler and Richard Rau in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p
sj-R-3-psp-10.1177_01461672221107205 – Do Agency and Communion Explain the Relationship Between Perceiver and Target Effects in Interpersonal Perception? A Meta-Analysis on Generalized Reciprocity
No full textsj-R-3-psp-10.1177_01461672221107205 for Do Agency and Communion Explain the Relationship Between Perceiver and Target Effects in Interpersonal Perception? A Meta-Analysis on Generalized Reciprocity by Titus Schauf, Michael Dufner, Steffen Nestler and Richard Rau in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p
sj-csv-1-psp-10.1177_01461672221107205 – Do Agency and Communion Explain the Relationship Between Perceiver and Target Effects in Interpersonal Perception? A Meta-Analysis on Generalized Reciprocity
No full textsj-csv-1-psp-10.1177_01461672221107205 for Do Agency and Communion Explain the Relationship Between Perceiver and Target Effects in Interpersonal Perception? A Meta-Analysis on Generalized Reciprocity by Titus Schauf, Michael Dufner, Steffen Nestler and Richard Rau in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
