1,721,672 research outputs found

    Michael Christopher Hanovius to Carl Linnaeus

    No full text
    Michael Christopher Hanovius to Carl Linnaeu

    Michael Christopher Hanovius to Carl Linnaeus

    No full text
    Michael Christopher Hanovius to Carl Linnaeu

    Michael Christopher Hanovius to Carl Linnaeus

    No full text
    Michael Christopher Hanovius to Carl Linnaeu

    Michael Christopher Hanovius to Carl Linnaeus

    No full text
    Michael Christopher Hanovius to Carl Linnaeu

    Michael Christopher Hanovius to Carl Linnaeus

    No full text
    Michael Christopher Hanovius to Carl Linnaeu

    Kinetic control of polyaryl formation in a pyrolysis environment

    No full text
    Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, 1995.Includes bibliographical references (p. 296-301).by Michael Christopher Masonjones.Ph.D

    Michael Christopher Lawlor : Bright Flight

    No full text
    Lawlor's work is defined as exploring "the epistemological nature of photography"; his use of Cibachrome materials is briefly discussed. Artist's statement. Biographical notes. 3 bibl. ref

    Cuisine : Colour Photographs by Michael Christopher Lawlor

    No full text
    Donaldson briefly describes Lawlor's career and his photographic installation. Artist's statement

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore