1,721,263 research outputs found
Biblīograficheskīĭ ukazatelʹ vyshedshikh v Rossīi v 1859, 1860 i 1861 godakh knig i stateĭ po chasti pedagogiki, didaktiki i metodiki /
Supplement to Zhurnal Ministerstva narodnago prosvi︠e︡shchenī︠ia︡.Mode of access: Internet.With: Biblīograficheskīĭ ukazatelʹ vyshedshikh v Rossīi v 1862 godu knig i stateĭ po chasti pedagogiki, didaktiki i metodiki / V.I. Mezhov. Sanktpeterburg : [s.n.], 1864. -- Biblīograficheskīĭ ukazatelʹ vyshedshikh v Rossīi v 1863 godu knig i stateĭ po chasti pedagogiki, didaktiki i metodiki / [V.I. Mezhov]. [Sanktpeterburg] : V tip. Rogalʹ skago i Ko., [1865?
Macrostylis setulosa Mezhov 1992
Macrostylis setulosa Mezhov, 1992 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 8 C 216677 -AD 60 - 4 F 8 B-B 55 B- 34627 ABB 7479 Macrostylis setulosa Mezhov, 1992; pp. 83–87, Fig. 1. Type fixation. Holotype: non-ovigerous female, 3.2 mm, Mc- 1274, by original designation. Type material. Holotype: non-ovigerous female, Mc- 1274, with 3 stage III mancae; paratype: non-ovigerous female, 2.8 mm, Mc- 1275. All material deposited at the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University. Type locality. Southern Ocean, Scotia Arc, South Sandwich Islands with R/V Akademik Kurchatov, cruise 11, station 880, 57° 07.4’ S, 26 ° 40 ’ W; 757 m depth; by means of the bottom sampler "Okean". Type material - Remarks. The paratype material collected at stations R/V Akademik Kurchatov 927 originate from a very different locality and depth. Type material was not available for comparison but there is a possibility that they are different species. Because of that, the information given by Mezhov about male characters were excluded here and corresponding stations are listed below as further records instead of type locality. The type locality is hence restricted to the locality of the holotype. Further records. R/V Akademik Kurchatov, cruise 11, station 927, 56° 08.4’ S, 52 ° 40 ’ W; 1,660 m depth. R/V Dm. Mendeleev, cruise 43, station 4084 -I, 70 ° 40.6 ’ S, 15 ° 47.8 ’ W; 4,335 m depth. R/V Dm. Mendeleev, cruise 43, station 4084 -II, 70 ° 53.17 ’ S, 15 ° 04.51’ W; 2,925 m depth. R/V Dm. Mendeleev, cruise 43, station 4085, 60° 33.35 ’S, 35 ° 37.1 ’ W; 2,705 m depth. Modified diagnosis. Pereonite 3 posterolateral margins produced posteriorly, ventral spine present, small. Pereonite 4 lateral margins convex, ventral spine absent. Pleotelson ovoid. Pereopod III ischium dorsal lobe triangular. Operculum elongate, distally tapering, apical width smaller 0.50 operculum width. Description of non-ovigerous female. Body. Length 2.8–3.2 mm, 4.1 width, subcylindrical; with furry cuticular setules, mainly laterally on tergites V–VII and covering whole pleotelson. Ventral spines. Pereonite 1 spine acute, prominent. Pereonite 3 spine acute, small, placed medially on midline. Pereonite 4 spine absent. Pereonite 5 spine acute, small, closer to posterior segment border. Pereonite 6 spine acute, prominent, closer to posterior segment border. Pereonite 7 spine prominent. Cephalothorax. Frons straight, frontal furrow present, convex, almost straight, anterior to antennal articulations; posterolateral margins acute. Fossosome. Length 0.82 width, 0.21 body length. Lateral tergite margins confluent, ventral surface without keel; sternite articulations present in rudimental condition. Pereonite 1. Anterior margin concave. Pereonite 3. Posterolateral margin produced posteriorly, tapering, with lateral constriction anteriorly to seta articulations; posterolateral setae bifid, robust, spine-like. Pereonites 4–7. Posterolateral margins produced posteriorly, tapering. Posterolateral setae bifid, robust, spine-like. Pereonite 4. Width 1.1 pereonite 5 width, length 0.33 width; pereonal collum present. Lateral margins simple concave. Pereonite 5. Length 0.48 width, 1.3 pereonite 4 length. Pereonite 6. Length 0.56 width, 1.2 pereonite 5 length. Pereonite 7. Length 0.50 width. Pleotelson. Length 0.23 body length, 1.4 width, narrower than pereonite 7; ovoid, setal ridges visible, waist present. Width maximum anterior to waist. Statocysts present, dorsal slot-like apertures transverse across longitudinal axis, convex. Posterior apex length 0.15 pleotelson length, concave at uropod insertions, posteriorly convex, evenly rounded. Labrum. Anterior margin concave. Antennula. Length 0.23 antenna length, width 0.60 antenna width. Articles decreasing in size from proximal to distal. Articles 1–4 distinctly longer than wide, cylindrical. Article 1 longest and widest, with 3 setae: 2 simple, 1 broom. Article 2 with 5 setae: 2 simple, 3 broom. Article 3 with 1 simple seta. Article 5 minute, squat, with 2 setae: 1 simple, 1 aesthetasc. Antenna. Article 1 squat. Article 2 elongate, longer than article 1. Article 3 elongate, longer than article 1. Article 4 about as long as articles 1–3 together, distally with 2 simple setae. Article 5 shorter than article 4, distally with 2 broom setae. Flagellum with 6 articles. Mandibles. Left and right mandible incisor processes multidentate with dorsal and ventral subdistal teeth that partly enclose lacinia. Maxilliped. Basis length 2.9 width; epipod length 3.0 width, 1.0 basis length; palp wider than endite, article 2 wider than articles 1 and 3, article 1 longer than article 3. Pereopod I. Ischium dorsal margin with 3 submarginal setae. Merus dorsally with 5 setae: 4 in submarginal row, 1 bifurcate distally; ventral margin with 2 setae. Carpus dorsally with 1 seta. Dactylus distally with 3 sensillae. Pereopod III. Ischium dorsal lobe triangular; proximally with 4 setae; apex with 1 prominent seta; apical seta robust, bifurcate, recurved, flexibly articulated; distally with 4 setae. Merus dorsally with 11 setae: 4 thin, long, 6 more robust, bifurcate, long, 1 short, spine-like; ventrally with 4 setae. Carpus dorsally with 5 setae, 4 long, bifurcate, 1 broom, ventrally with 5 setae: 4 potentially distally sensillate, 1 short, bifurcate. Dactylus with 3 sensillae. Pereopod IV. Carpus subcylindrical. Operculum. Elongate, length 1.7 width; apical width 0.47 operculum width; distally tapering; with lateral fringe consisting of 9 setae, distinctly separate from apical row of setae; with 16 pappose setae on apex. Uropod. Length 0.94 pleotelson length; protopod length 8.3 width, 0.69 pleotelson length, protopod distal margin blunt, endopod insertion terminally; endopod length 6.0 width, 0.36 protopod length, width at articulation clearly narrower than protopod.Published as part of Riehl, Torben & Brandt, Angelika, 2013, Southern Ocean Macrostylidae reviewed with a key to the species and new descriptions from Maud Rise, pp. 160-203 in Zootaxa 3692 (1) on pages 191-193, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3692.1.10, http://zenodo.org/record/22061
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Macrostylis vinogradovae Mezhov 1992
Macrostylis vinogradovae Mezhov, 1992 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 7 C 4763 BD- 9260 - 4169 - 8 B 1 F-F 666097 CB 142 Macrostylis vinogradovae Mezhov, 1992; p. 87, Fig. 2. Type fixation. Holotype: non-ovigerous female, 2.6 mm, Mc- 1279, by original designation. Type material. Holotype: non-ovigerous female, Mc- 1279, DM station 4084 -II; paratype: female fragment, 1.2 mm, Mc- 1280, DM station 4084 -I. All material deposited at the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University. Type locality. Southern Ocean, southeastern Weddell Sea, off Kapp Norvegia, Dronning Maud Land, with R/ V Dm. Mendeleev, cruise 43, station 4084 -II, 70 ° 53.17 ’ S, 15 ° 04.51’ W; 2,925 m depth; by means of the bottom sampler "Okean". Type material - Remarks. Only the holotype is complete and the only other specimen is a strongly-damaged fragment of which substantial parts are missing. Further, the paratype was collected from a very different depth (bathyal vs. abyssal). An allocation of both specimens to the same species is therefore put in doubt. The type locality is consequently restricted here to the collection locality of the holotype. Further records. Southern Ocean, southeastern Weddell Sea, off Kapp Norvegia, Dronning Maud Land, with R/V Dm. Mendeleev, cruise 43, station 4084 -I, 70 ° 40.6 ’ S, 15 ° 47.8 ’ W; 4,335 m depth; by means of the bottom sampler "Okean". Modified diagnosis. Pereonite 3 posterolateral margins not produced posteriorly. Pereonite 4 wider than pereonite 5, lateral margins convex, posterolateral margins produced posteriorly, tapering, posterolateral setae spine-like, robust. Pleotelson ovoid, waist present, setal ridges visible. Ischium dorsal lobe triangular; apex with 1 prominent seta; distally with no seta. Operculum elongate, subsimilar pleotelson length, distally tapering, ventrally keeled, apical width smaller 0.50 operculum width, apical setae short. Description female. Body. Length 2.6 mm, subcylindrical. Ventral spines. All spines acute. Pereonite 1 spine prominent. Pereonite 3 spine small, closer to anterior segment border. Pereonite 4 spine directed posteriorly, small, closer to posterior segment border. Pereonite 5 spine prominent, medially. Pereonite 6 spine prominent, closer to posterior segment border. Pereonite 7 spine prominent. Imbricate ornamentation (IO). Pereonites 4–7 IO most distinct at collum. Cephalothorax. Length 0.84 width, 0.16 body length; frons straight, frontal furrow present, straight, slightly anteriorly to antennulae insertions. Fossosome. Length 0.94 width, 0.23 body length. Lateral tergite margins confluent, ventral surface without keel; sternite margins present, not fully expressed. Pereonite 1. Anterior margin concave. Pereonite 4. Width 1.2 pereonite 5 width, length 0.41 width; pereonal collum present. Lateral margins convex. Posterolateral margins produced posteriorly, tapering. Posterolateral setae bifid, robust, spine-like. Pereonites 5–7. Posterolateral margin produced posteriorly, rounded; posterolateral setae bifid, robust. Pereonite 5. Length 0.45 width, subequal pereonite 4 length. Pereonite 6. Length 0.70 width, 1.4 pereonite 5 length. Pleotelson. Ovoid, waist present, setal ridges visible, length 0.20 body length, 1.56 width, narrower than pereonite 7; statocysts present, dorsal slot-like apertures present. Posterior apex concave at uropod insertions, posteriorly broadly rounded, convex, length 0.21 pleotelson length. Maxilliped. Basis length 3.8 width; epipod length 3.1 width, 1.0 basis length; palp width subequal basis width, article 2 wider than articles 1 and 3, article 1 and 3 subequal in length. Pereopod III. Length 0.47 body length. Ischium dorsal lobe triangular; proximally with 2 setae; apex with 1 prominent, robust, bifurcate, straight seta; distally with no seta. Merus dorsally with 5 setae, ventrally with 3 setae. Carpus dorsally and ventrally with 4 setae respectively. Pereopod IV. Length 0.25 body length. Operculum. Elongate, length 1.8 width, 1.0 pleotelson dorsal length; apical width 0.43 operculum width; distally tapering, ventrally keeled; with lateral fringe consisting of 11–12 setae, distinctly separate from apical row of setae; with 11 short, pappose setae on apex, completely covering anal opening. Uropod. Inserting on posterior pleotelson margin; length 1.1 pleotelson length; protopod length 8.2 width, 0.85 pleotelson length, distal margin blunt, endopod insertion terminally; endopod 0.33 protopod length, width at articulation subsimilar protopod width.Published as part of Riehl, Torben & Brandt, Angelika, 2013, Southern Ocean Macrostylidae reviewed with a key to the species and new descriptions from Maud Rise, pp. 160-203 in Zootaxa 3692 (1) on page 194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3692.1.10, http://zenodo.org/record/22061
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
