1,720,965 research outputs found
An Index to Aerial Photography in Minnesota
No full textPublished as Scientific Journal Paper Series No. 6429 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.Ulliman, Joseph J.; Meyer, Merle P.. (1968). An Index to Aerial Photography in Minnesota. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/57799
Construction of a Local Aerial Stand Volume Table from the Photo Measurements of One Interpreter
No full textPublished as Scientific Journal Paper Series No. 6034 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.Data provided by the 1965-65 Northwest Paper Company Foundation's Forestry Graduate
Fellowship Project.Frits, Garry W.; Meyer, Merle P.. (1966). Construction of a Local Aerial Stand Volume Table from the Photo Measurements of One Interpreter. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/57672
An Index to U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Maps of Minnesota
No full textPublished as Scientific Journal Paper Series No. 3796 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.Wright, Herbert E. Jr.; Meyer, Merle P.. (1957). An Index to U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Maps of Minnesota. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/56697
An Index to U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Maps of Minnesota as of July, 1967
No full textPublished as Scientific Journal Paper Series No. 6359 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.Ulliman, Joseph J.; Meyer, Merle P.. (1967). An Index to U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Maps of Minnesota as of July, 1967. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/57796
An Index to U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Maps of Minnesota as of July 1, 1958
No full textPublished as Miscellaneous Journal Paper Series No. 979 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.Wright, Herbert E. Jr.; Meyer, Merle P.. (1958). An Index to U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Maps of Minnesota as of July 1, 1958. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/57167
Construction of Local Aerial Stand Volume
No full textPublished as Scientific Journal Paper Series No. 5968 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.This project was made possible through a Graduate Fellowship grant from the Northwest
Paper Company Foundation.Ek, Alan R.; Meyer, Merle P.. (1966). Construction of Local Aerial Stand Volume. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/57584
A Test of a Composite Local Aerial Stand Volume Table Outside the Locality of Origin
No full textPublished as Scientific Journal Paper Series No. 5848 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.Lamont, Robert H.; Trochlil, Richard C.; Meyer, Merle P.. (1966). A Test of a Composite Local Aerial Stand Volume Table Outside the Locality of Origin. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/57574
A Composite Local Aerial Stand Volume Table for the Cloquet, Minnesota Vicinity
No full textPublished as Scientific Journal Paper Series No. 5846 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.Lamont, Robert H.; John, Hugo H.; Meyer, Merle P.. (1966). A Composite Local Aerial Stand Volume Table for the Cloquet, Minnesota Vicinity. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/57566
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
