105,048 research outputs found
Basketball - Mens - 1981-1990 - 44
Athletics: Basketball - Mens - 1981-1990(Newspaper caption) - Texas A&M Freshman guard Kenny Brown skies over St. Mary's defender Jai Mahone in action Monday night at G. Rollie White Coliseum. The Aggies defeated the Rattlers to raise their record to 14-12 on the year. The 10th-ranked Rattlers are at 22-6 on the year after the loss to A&M
Schreiber (G.). Gemeinschaften des Mittelalters. Recht und Verfassung. Kult und Frömmigkeit. (Gesammelte Abhanlungen, T. I)
Cap O. M., Mens A. Schreiber (G.). Gemeinschaften des Mittelalters. Recht und Verfassung. Kult und Frömmigkeit. (Gesammelte Abhanlungen, T. I). In: Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, tome 29, fasc. 1, 1951. pp. 222-225
Schreiber (G.). Gemeinschaften des Mittelalters. Recht und Verfassung. Kult und Frömmigkeit. (Gesammelte Abhanlungen, T. I)
Cap O. M., Mens A. Schreiber (G.). Gemeinschaften des Mittelalters. Recht und Verfassung. Kult und Frömmigkeit. (Gesammelte Abhanlungen, T. I). In: Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, tome 29, fasc. 1, 1951. pp. 222-225
«Je me tais», «je mens»
Granger Gilles G. «Je me tais», «je mens». In: Bulletin de la Classe des lettres et des sciences morales et politiques, tome 61, 1975. pp. 548-551
Bibliographie Hilarion G. Petzold 1958 – 2009 mit Anhang als Einführung
Dieses Archiv enthält die Gesamtbibliographie der Werke des Autors nebst einiger Texte „Über H. G. Petzold“ im Schlussteil der Bibliographie sowie einen Anhang mit einer Einführung in die Architektur des Werkes in seinem wissenslogischen Aufbau als Ausarbeitung seines „Tree of Science Modells“ (2007).This archive contains the complete bibliography of the author and some texts about H. G. Petzold, moreover an epilogue with an introduction to the architecture of the works in its epistemological structure and composition and as an elaborations of Petzold’s „Tree of Science Modell (2007).https://www.fpi-publikation.de/polyloge/01-2009-petzold-h-g-gesamtbibliographie-h-g-petzold-1958-2009-updating-november2009/peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
An information sampling explanation for the in-group heterogeneity effect
Includes supplementary material: replication file.People often perceive their in-groups as more heterogeneous than their out-groups. We propose an information sampling explanation for this in-group heterogeneity effect. We note that people frequently obtain larger samples of information about in-groups than about out-groups. Using computer simulations, we show that this asymmetry in sample sizes implies the in-group heterogeneity effect under a wide range of assumptions about how experience affects perceived variability. This is the case even when perceived variability is the outcome of rational information processing, implying that the structure of the environment is sufficient to explain the emergence of the in-group heterogeneity effect. A key assumption of our explanation is that perceived group variability depends on the size of the sample observed about this group. We provide evidence in support for this assumption in two experiments. Our results considerably expand the scope and relevance of a prior sampling explanation proposed by Linville, Fischer, and Salovey (1989). They also complement other explanations that proposed that information about in-groups and out-groups is processed differently.Le Mens benefited from financial support from Southern Denmark University and Grants PSI2013-41909-P, #AEI/FEDER UE-PSI2016-75353, Ramon y Cajal Fellowship (RYC-2014-15035) from the Spanish MINECO, Grant IN[15]_EFG_ECO_2281 from the BBVA Foundation and ERC Consolidator #772268 from the European Commission. E. Konovalova was funded by Spanish MINECO Grant PSI2013-41909-P to G. Le Mens
- …
