1,721,091 research outputs found

    Serum albumin and risk of cardiovascular events in primary and secondary prevention: a systematic review of observational studies and Bayesian meta-regression analysis

    No full text
    The predictive role of serum albumin (SA) has been evaluated in primary prevention studies. We want to assess the association of SA with the subsequent risk of cardiovascular events (CVE) in primary and secondary prevention studies. We performed a systematic review and Bayesian meta-regression analysis. Studies were identified by PubMed and EMBASE database using a combination of the following terms and MeSH terms: "serum albumin", "myocardial infarction, "cardiovascular events", "percutaneous coronary intervention" and "coronary restenosis". No time restriction of the research was applied. Two experienced physicians reviewed data on outcome measures and assessed the quality rating. The main outcomes were CVE including myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary restenosis. 15 studies of SA and CVE were identified involving 65,077 subjects with a mean age of 57.89 +/- 6.05 years and a mean follow-up of 9.4 (+/- 5.56) years. Subjects under SA cut-off of 3.8 g/dL had a combined hazard ratio (HR) for CVE of 2.16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.93-2.45]. An increased risk for CVE was also evident using SA as a continuous variable (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.5-2.39). Females and males had a similar risk for CVE (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.92-3.16, and HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.27-1.69, respectively). We found a similar risk of CVE between primary and secondary prevention studies (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.5-2.17, and HR 2.47, 95% CI 2.24-2.75, respectively). Low SA levels are associated with an increased risk of CVE, not only in subjects free from CVE, but also in patients who already experienced a CVE

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Defect characterization in silicon particle detectors irradiated with Li ions

    No full text
    High Energy Physics experiments at future very high luminosity colliders will require ultra radiation-hard silicon detectors that can withstand fast hadron fluences up to 10^(16) cm^(-2). In order to test the detectors radiation hardness in this fluence range, long irradiation times are required at the currently available proton irradiation facilities. Energetic (58 MeV) Lithium (Li) ions, with experimental hardness factor about two orders of magnitude higher than 24 GeV protons for 280-300 μm thick detectors, could represent a promising alternative radiation source. In this study, the degradation mechanisms in single pad p+-n Standard Float Zone (STFZ) and Diffusion Oxygenated Float Zone (DOFZ) Si detectors irradiated with Li ions up to the fluence of 2.9×10^(12) Li/cm^(2) have been investigated by means of Photo Induced Current Transient Spectroscopy and Thermally Stimulated Currents. Results are compared with the radiation damage induced by 24 GeV proton, 1 MeV neutron and 60Co γ-ray irradiation. The critical Li ion fluence for cluster formation is found to be in the range 4.1-21×10^(11) Li/cm^(2) and its correlation to the corresponding value for hadrons is discussed

    Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. a systematic review and comparison of the international guidelines

    Full text link
    Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) requires long-term anticoagulation to prevent recurrent thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly used in APS patients, but contradictory guidelines recommendations on their use do exist. We performed a systematic review of literature including studies investigating the role of DOACs in APS patients. At this aim, PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines. We identified 14 studies which investigated the use of DOACs in patients with APS, of which 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 1 post-hoc analysis of 3 RCTs, 7 case series and 3 cohort studies (2 prospective and 1 retrospective). Among DOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used (n = 531), followed by dabigatran (n = 90) and apixaban (n = 46). Regarding guidelines indications, the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines recommend against the use of DOACs in all APS patients. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), British Society for Haematology (BSH), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidance provided more detailed indications stating that warfarin should be the first-choice treatment but DOACs may be considered in patients (1) already on a stable anticoagulation with a DOAC, (2) with low-quality anticoagulation by warfarin, (3) unwilling/unable to undergo INR monitoring, (4) with contraindications or serious adverse events under warfarin. Patients with arterial APS or triple positivity should be treated with warfarin while venous APS with single or double positivity may be candidate to DOACs, but high-quality studies are needed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore