33,848 research outputs found
On Meng Sen's teaching and lecture notes of Ming and Qing history at Peking University during the 1930s
No full textWhile teaching the histories of the Ming and Qing dynasties, Meng Sen (1869-1937), developed three textbooks in the 1930s: Lecture Notes on the Ming History (.... Mingshi jiangyi), Lecture Notes on the Qing History (.... Qingshi jiangyi), and Lecture Notes on the History of the Founding of the Manchu State (....... Manzhou kaiguo shi jiangyi). In these book titles, the term " history" refers specifically to "standard history."In tracing Meng Sen's original intention in producing these textbooks, all three works suggest the author's desire to write history. He wrote Lecture Notes on the Ming History to prepare a future revision of the History of the Ming (.. Mingshi); similarly he wrote Lecture Notes on the Qing History and Lecture Notes on the History of the Founding of the Manchu State with the intention to revise the Draft History of the Qing (... Qingshi gao). Meng Sen summarized Sima Guang's (..., 1019-86) view of history as " imitating the good and avoiding the bad," which he believed represented the "essential meaning of history." Meng followed Sima Guang's model in compiling the Lecture Notes on the Ming History and Lecture Notes on the Qing History, as shown in their style and format. By comparison, his writing of the Lecture Notes on the History of the Founding of the Manchu State attempted to merge the traditional annals-biographic style with narrative history from the West, or to pour old wine into a new bottle. Meng Sen presented his innovative efforts at Peking University, introducing young scholars to standards for history writing, and doing his utmost to guide and encourage his students; some of whom became noted scholars in the study of Ming and Qing histories.A&HCIARTICLE2119-1545
AEM-18-2686-Supplement2019-1-17 – Supplemental material for Kinematics uncertainty analysis of mine bolter manipulator based on Chebyshev interval algorithms
No full textSupplemental material, AEM-18-2686-Supplement2019-1-17 for Kinematics uncertainty analysis of mine bolter manipulator based on Chebyshev interval algorithms by Jun Zhang, Qing-xue Huang, Wenjun Meng, Xiangdong Yu, Guoying Meng and Lifeng Ma in Advances in Mechanical Engineering</p
Hong lou meng chuan qi /
No full textJu "Hong lou meng" gu shi qing jie gai bian.Under title: Yan qing ci zao shuo bu.Mode of access: Internet
Qing chao qian ji.
No full text孟森著.At head of title: 中央大學淸史講義.Meng Sen zhu.At head of title: Zhong yang da xue Qing shi jiang yi
Book Review: Timber and Forestry in Qing China: Sustaining the Market by Meng Zhang
No full textReview of: Zhang, Meng. Timber and Forestry in Qing China: Sustaining the Market. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2021
[[alternative]]The Qi Theory Type of the Ming and Qing Dynasties “Zheng Meng” Commentary:Apply “Zheng Meng Initial Implication”As the Center (III-I)
No full text系統編號: PE10006-0099計畫編號: NSC100-2410-H343-015執行機構: 南華大學哲學系研究期間: 10008~10107[[abstract]]明清《正蒙》注的氣論類型： 以《正蒙初義》為中心 在明清各《正蒙》注釋本中，清儒王植的《正蒙初義》具有承先啟後的地位。設若 《正蒙》是研究張載哲學所無可忽視的文獻依據，則明清《正蒙》各注顯然最能呈現明 清思想家研究張載氣論之發展軌跡。但儘管張載哲學與明清氣學研究日盛，且張載氣論 更被視為明清氣學的源頭之一，但是現今對明清各《正蒙》注釋本的研究卻相對罕見。 如此一來，竟似吾人可全然忽視《正蒙》在明清兩代的研究動態，而泛論張載氣論在明 清哲學中的發展及其對明清氣學的影響。這是否正形成思想詮釋上的獨斷與斷裂呢？基 於此，本計劃之主旨在於以《正蒙初義》為主軸，辨析明清《正蒙》各注的氣論類型。 本計劃有五項預計探討的內容：其一，辨析《正蒙初義》及其所收各注的氣論異同。 其二，探究王植對《正蒙》一書的詮釋原則、進路與架構。其三，澄清《正蒙初義》及 其所收各注是如何在「理氣心性論」的基礎上，發展或批判張載「天人合一」思想。其 四，梳理「明清《正蒙》學」的發展脈絡。其五，比較《正蒙初義》與明清氣論學者在 氣論上的交集、分歧或衝突。並且依據前述四項研究成果，辨析《正蒙初義》及其所收 各注的氣論類型，拓展當代對明清氣學的研究範圍與成果。[[abstract]]In the various Ming and Qing Dynasties’ “Zheng Meng”commentaries, Qing scholar, Wang Zhi’s “Zheng Meng initial implication”has the status that serves as a link between the past and future. If “Zheng Meng”is the un-neglected literature basis for studying Zhang Zai’s philosophy, then the various Ming and Qing Dynasties’“Zheng Meng” commentaries obviously will be the most able to present the development path for the Ming and Qing Dynasties’thinkers to study Zhang Zai’s Qi theory. Despite the prevalence of Zhang Zai’s philosophy and the Ming and Qing Dynasties’Qi research, and Zhang Zai’s Qi theory being treated as one of the Ming and Qing Dynasties’Qi sources, it is relatively rare to see research on the various Ming and Qing Dynasties’“Zheng Meng” commentaries. In this way, the research trend of “Zheng Meng”in the Ming and Qing Dynasties can be totally ignored, and only the development of Zhang Zai’s Qi theory on the Ming and Qing Dynasties’ philosophy and the impact of Zhang Zai’s Qi theory on the Ming and Qing Dynasties’Qi will be discussed. Is this the formation of the arbitrary and fracture for ideological interpretation? Based on this, the purpose of the program is to apply the “Zheng Meng initial implication”as the main axis to analyze the Qi theory types of the Ming and Qing Dynasties’ “Zheng Meng”commentary. There are five contents expected to be explored in this program: 1. Analyze the Qi theory similarities and differences between “Zheng Meng initial implication”and the various collected commentaries. 2. Explore the interpretation principle, approach and structure of Wang Zhi on the book of “Zheng Meng”.3. Clarify how “Zheng Meng initial implication” and the various collected commentaries develop or criticize Zhang Zai’s “Unity of Heaven and Human Beings”thought on the basis of “theory of material force and mind”.4. Organize the development context of the Ming and Qing Dynasties’“Zheng Meng”ology’.5. Compare the connection, differences or conflicts of “Zheng Meng initial implication”and the Ming and Qing Dynasties’Qi theory scholars on Qi theory, and based on the aforementioned four study result to analyze the Qi theory types of “Zheng Meng initial implication”and the various collected commentaries, and expand contemporary development on Ming and Qing Dynasties’Qi research scope and result
- …
