1,720,971 research outputs found
Catalogue of the Ctenostylidae (Diptera, Schizophora) of the World
No full textPereira-Colavite, A., Mello, R. L. (2014): Catalogue of the Ctenostylidae (Diptera, Schizophora) of the World. Zootaxa 3838 (2): 215-223, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3838.2.
FIGURE 1 in Catalogue of the Teratomyzidae (Diptera, Opomyzoidea) of the World
No full textFIGURE 1. Distribution records of Teratomyzidae genera in the Australasian/Oceanic region. Auster (green square); Lips (red circle); Pous (black cross); Teratomyza (blue circle); Teratomyza undescribed species (black circle). Australian provinces figured.Published as part of Rodrigues, J. P. V., Pereira-Colavite, A. & Mello, R. L., 2016, Catalogue of the Teratomyzidae (Diptera, Opomyzoidea) of the World, pp. 275-285 in Zootaxa 4205 (3) on page 276, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4205.3.7, http://zenodo.org/record/19434
Catalogue of the Teratomyzidae (Diptera, Opomyzoidea) of the World
No full textRodrigues, J. P. V., Pereira-Colavite, A., Mello, R. L. (2016): Catalogue of the Teratomyzidae (Diptera, Opomyzoidea) of the World. Zootaxa 4205 (3): 275-285, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4205.3.
Sinolochmostylia Yang
No full textGenus Sinolochmostylia Yang Sinolochmostylia Yang, 1995: 247 (249). Type species: Sinolochmostylia sinica Yang, 1995 (orig. des.). Refs. Yang 1995: 247 (249) (desc. [Chinese and English]); Korneyev 2006: 63 (diagnosis; Far East Russia key); Han 2006: 359 (n. occ.); Rafael et al. 2009: 63 (notes), 64 (tab.); Korneyev 2010: 965 (distr.); Câmara & Rafael 2013: 147 (notes). sinica Yang, 1995: 248 (249). Type material: HT female (CAU). Type locality: CHINA, Zhejiang, Kaihua, Gutian Mountain, 29.3º N 118.2º E. Distr.– China (Zhejiang), South Korea. Refs. Sinolochmostylia sinica Yang 1995: 248 (fig. and desc. [Chinese]); Han 2006: 358 –360 (figs.); Korneyev 2006: 62 (figs.), 63 (key); Rafael et al. 2009: 64 (tab.); Korneyev 2010: 965 (distr.).Published as part of Pereira-Colavite, A. & Mello, R. L., 2014, Catalogue of the Ctenostylidae (Diptera, Schizophora) of the World, pp. 215-223 in Zootaxa 3838 (2) on page 219, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3838.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/22791
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Stepta McAlpine & Keyzer 1994
No full textStepta McAlpine & Keyzer, 1994 Stepta McAlpine & Keyzer, 1994: 310. Type-species: Teratomyza (Teratoptera) latipennis Malloch, 1933b (orig. des.). Gender feminine. Ref. McAlpine & Keyzer 1994: 310 (key, desc., taxon. notes). latipennis (Malloch, 1933b: 388) [Teratomyza (Teratoptera)]. Type locality: Chile, Mechuque Island. Distr. Chile. Holotype female (BMNH). Ref. Teratomyza (Teratoptera) latipennis; Malloch 1933b: 387 (key), 388 (desc.), 389 (taxon. notes), plate VII (fig. 13); Stuardo Ortiz 1946: 140 (cat.); Prado 1975: 1 (cat.); Stepta latipennis; McAlpine & Keyzer 1994: 310 (n. comb.).Published as part of Rodrigues, J. P. V., Pereira-Colavite, A. & Mello, R. L., 2016, Catalogue of the Teratomyzidae (Diptera, Opomyzoidea) of the World, pp. 275-285 in Zootaxa 4205 (3) on page 281, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4205.3.7, http://zenodo.org/record/19434
Pous McAlpine & Keyzer 1994
No full textPous McAlpine & Keyzer, 1994 Pous McAlpine & Keyzer, 1994: 313. Type-species: Pous manicula McAlpine & Keyzer, 1994 (orig. des.). Gender masculine. Ref. McAlpine & Keyzer 1994: 309 (figs.), 310 (key), 313 (desc.), 314 (figs.), 325 (biol.); Evenhuis 2012 (cat.). manicula McAlpine & Keyzer, 1994: 314. Type locality: Australia, New South Wales, Mooney Mooney Creek near (10 km SW of) Gosford. Distr. Australia (New South Wales, Queensland). Holotype male (AMS). Ref. Pous manicula; McAlpine & Keyzer 1994: 309, 314 (figs.); Evenhuis 2012 (cat.).Published as part of Rodrigues, J. P. V., Pereira-Colavite, A. & Mello, R. L., 2016, Catalogue of the Teratomyzidae (Diptera, Opomyzoidea) of the World, pp. 275-285 in Zootaxa 4205 (3) on page 280, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4205.3.7, http://zenodo.org/record/19434
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
