1,721,042 research outputs found
Biliary anastomotic strictures are recipient, not donor-related complications; deserve international guidelines for clinical diagnosis and management
Age disparities in transplantation
Purpose of review: The aim of this review is to outline disparities in liver and kidney transplantation across age spectrum. Disparities do not involve only recipients whose age may severely affect the possibility to access to a potentially life-saving procedure, but donors as well. The attitude of transplant centers to use older donors reflects on waiting list mortality and drop-out. This review examines which age categories are currently harmed and how different allocation systems may minimize disparities.
Recent findings: Specific age categories suffer disparities in the access to transplantation. A better understanding of how properly evaluate graft quality, a continuous re-evaluation of the most favorable donor-to-recipient match and most equitable allocation system are the three key points to promote 'justice and equality' among transplant recipients.
Summary: The duty to protect younger patients waiting for transplantation and the request of older patients to have access to potentially life-saving treatment urge the transplant community to use older organs thus increasing the number of available grafts, to evaluate new allocation systems with the aim to maximize 'utility' while respecting 'equity' and to avoid 'futility' thus minimizing waiting list mortality and drop-out, and improving the survival benefits for all patients requiring a transplant
Hybrid partial ALPPS. a feasible approach in case of right trisegmentectomy and macrovascular invasion
I read with great interest the excellent
article ‘‘The Impact of Different Surgical
Techniques on Outcomes in Laparoscopic
Sleeve Gastrectomies’’1 from Berger et al,
published in the September 2016 issue of
Annals of Surgery. The role of the impact
of different technical details on the outcome
of sleeve gastrectomies is particularly
relevant, and several aspects pointed out by
the authors certainly deserve the maximum
attention of the international bariatric
surgical community.
The set of data reported in the study is
impressive and very informative. However,
some concerns need to be raised because they
constitute excellent examples of the strength
and limitations of a data registry observational
retrospective study, even if large and very
well conducted.
One of the main conclusion of the
article is related to the increased risk of a
leak associated with buttressing. Certainly,
the authors clarify that the literature on staple
line reinforcement has conflicting results.
They also acknowledge the lack of specific
information about the buttressing products
used in their series. This limitation is, indeed,
very relevant as it has been shown that there
are significant differences between them
VIABILITY TESTING DURING NORMOTHERMIC MACHINE PERFUSION REQUIRES BOTH HEPATOCELLULAR AND CHOLANGIOCELLULAR CRITERIA
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Chylous Leakage After a Laparoscopic Live-Donor Nephrectomy: Case Report and Literature Review.
Diaphragmatic hernia as a spontaneous sequela of a surgically-treated left infiltrating renal tumor: a case report.
- …
