458 research outputs found
Incomprehension or resistance? : the Markan disciples and the narrative logic of Mark 4:1—8:30
The characterization of the Markan disciples has been and continues to be the object of much scholarly reflection and speculation. For many, the Markan author’s presentation of Jesus’ disciples holds a key, if not the key, to unlocking the purpose and function of the gospel as a whole. Commentators differ as to whether the Markan disciples ultimately serve a pedagogical or polemical function, yet they are generally agreed that the disciples in Mark come off rather badly, especially when compared to their literary counterparts in Matthew, Luke, and John.
This narrative-critical study considers the characterization of the Markan disciples within the Sea Crossing movement (Mark 4:1–8:30). While commentators have, on the whole, interpreted the disciples’ negative characterization in this movement in terms of lack of faith and/or incomprehension, neither of these, nor a combination of the two, fully accounts for the severity of language leveled against the disciples by the narrator (6:52) and Jesus (8:17–18). Taking as its starting point an argument by Jeffrey B. Gibson (1986) that the harshness of Jesus’ rebuke in Mark 8:14–21 is occasioned not by the disciples’ lack of faith or incomprehension but by their active resistance to his Gentile mission, this investigation uncovers additional examples of the disciples’ resistance to Gentile mission, offering a better account of their negative portrayal within the Sea Crossing movement and helping explain many of their other failures.
In short, this study argues that in Mark 4:1–8:26, the disciples are characterized as resistant to Jesus’ Gentile mission and to their participation in that mission, the chief consequence being that they are rendered incapable of recognizing Jesus’ vocational identity as Israel’s Messiah (Thesis A). This leads to a secondary thesis, namely, that in Mark 8:27–30, Peter’s recognition of Jesus’ messianic identity indicates that the disciples have finally come to accept Jesus’ Gentile mission and their participation in it (Thesis B).
“Chapter One: Introduction” offers a selective review of scholarly treatments of the Markan disciples, which shows that few scholars attribute resistance, let alone purposeful resistance, to the disciples.
“Chapter Two: The Rhetoric of Repetition” introduces the methodological tools, concepts, and perspectives employed in the study. It includes a section on narrative criticism, which focuses upon the story-as-discoursed and the implied author and reader, and a section on Construction Grammar, a branch of cognitive linguistics founded by Charles Fillmore and further developed by Paul Danove, which focuses upon semantic and narrative frames and case frame analysis.
“Chapter Three: The Sea Crossing Movement, Mark 4:1–8:30” addresses the question of Markan structure and argues that Mark 4:1–8:30 comprises a single, unified, narrative movement, whose action and plot is oriented to the Sea of Galilee and whose most distinctive feature is the network of sea crossings that transport Jesus and his disciples back and forth between Jewish and Gentile geopolitical spaces.
Following William Freedman, “Chapter Four: The Literary Motif” introduces two criteria (frequency and avoidability) for determining objectively what constitutes a literary motif and provides the methodological basis and starting point for the analyses performed in chapters five and six.
“Chapter Five: The Sea Crossing Motif” establishes and then carries out a lengthy narrative analysis of the Sea Crossing motif, which is oriented around Mark’s use of θάλασσα (thalassa) and πλοῖον (ploion), and “Chapter Six: The Loaves Motif” does the same for The Loaves motif, oriented around Mark’s use of ἄρτος (artos).
Finally, “Chapter Seven: The Narrative Logic of the Disciples (In)comprehension” draws together all narrative, linguistic, and exegetical insights of the previous chapters and offers a single coherent reading of the Sea Crossing movement that establishes Theses A and B.
Other endings of Mark as responses to Mark : an ideological-critical investigation into the longer and the shorter ending of Mark's Gospel
The Longer Ending and the Shorter Ending of Mark's Gospel are the ancient Markan readers' responses to Mark's Gospel. This leads us to the question of how the authors of these endings read their Mark's Gospel. These endings reflect the ideologies of their authors. The ideologies are related to the interests of the author or the authorial community (ideological primary group), and are embedded within the text. The Longer and the Shorter Ending were produced within a social context where the matter of apostolic authoritative leadership was a sensitive issue. A potential conflict is found in many contemporary texts from the NT and the extra- canonical texts, especially with regard to the apostolic authority of Mary Magdalene and Peter. Their struggles for apostolic authority are often found in the post-Easter narrative context. The assumed ideological primary community of the Longer Ending is Pro- Magdalene. It acknowledged Mary Magdalene as its authoritative leader who enjoyed apostolic authority especially over Peter. This community was interested in mission, and re-authenticated the mission of the Eleven. The LE provides a certain guideline for the qualification of leadership in the LE's community, which is the visual experience of the resurrected Jesus. The assumed ideological primary community of the Shorter Ending is Pro- Petrine. It was in favour of Peter, and suggested him as holding authoritative apostolic authority. This community wanted to clarify the resurrection of Jesus, and emended the empty tomb narrative of Mark's Gospel. It was also interested in mission, and the authority of disciples, especially that of Peter, in their performing mission tasks is highlighted in the Shorter Ending
\u3ci\u3eDiving Birds of North America\u3c/i\u3e: Color Plates
1. Arctic loon, adult in breeding plumage. Photo by author. 2. Red-throated loon, nesting adult. Photo by Kenneth W. Fink. 3. Yellow-billed loon, adult in breeding plumage. Photo by Kenneth W. Fink. 4. Common loon, nesting adult. Photo by Kenneth W. Fink. 5. Pied-billed grebe, adult in breeding plumage. Photo by author. 6. Least grebe, adult and young. Painting by Mark E. Marcuson. 7. Red-necked grebe, nesting adult. Photo by author. 8. Eared grebe, adults with young. Photo by Kenneth W. Fink. 9. Horned grebe, nesting adult. Photo by Kenneth W. Fink. 10. Western grebe, adult with young. Photo by Gary Nuechterlein. 11. Downy young of grebes, including light (top left) and dark phases (top right) of western, black-necked (upper left), horned (middle left), least (lower left), red-necked (middle right), and pied-billed (lower right). Painting by Jon Fjeldså. 12. Dovekie, adult in breeding plumage. Photo by Frank S. Todd. 13. Razorbill, adult in breeding plumage. Photo by author. 14. Common murre, adult in winter plumage. Photo by author. 15. Thick-billed murre, adult in breeding plumage. Photo by author. 16. Black guillemot, adult in breeding plumage. Photo by Frank S. Todd. 17. Pigeon guillemot, breeding colony. Photo by Frank S. Todd. 18. Pigeon guillemots, immature plumage (left), rhinoceros auklet (middle), and common murre, breeding plumage (right). Photo by author. 19. Marbled murrelet, incubating adult. Photo by Stuart Johnson. 20. Kittlitz murrelet, incubating adult. Photo by David G. Roseneau. 21. Cassin auklet, immature plumage. Photo by author. 22. Parakeet auklet, adults in breeding plumage. Photo by author. 23. Crested auklet, adults in breeding plumage. Photo by author. 24. Crested and least auklets, adults in breeding plumage. Photo by author. 25. Least auklet, juvenal plumage. Photo by Frank S. Todd. 26. Whiskered auklet, juvenal plumage. Photo by C. Fred Zeillemaker. 27. Whiskered, least, and crested auklets, breeding adults. Painting by Mark C. Marcuson. 28. Rhinoceros auklet, adult in breeding plumage. Photo by Frank S. Todd. 29. Tufted puffin, adults in breeding plumage. Photo by author. 30. Atlantic puffin, breeding colony. Photo by Frank S. Todd. 31. Atlantic puffin, adult in breeding plumage. Photo by Frank S. Todd. 32. Horned puffin adults in breeding plumage. Photo by author
¿Química o color?: comparación entre el uso de fluorescencia de rayos-X portátil y las técnicas visuales de clasificación de obsidiana de Tepeticpac. 50. Arqueología
Bibliografía
• Alva Ixtlilxochitl, F. de
1997. Historia de la nación chichimeca (2 vols.), en
Obras históricas, México, unam.
• Argote Espino, Denisse, Jesús Solé, Pedro López
García y Osvaldo Sterpone Canuto
2010. “Análisis composicional de seis yacimientos
de obsidiana del centro de México y su clasificación
con dbscan”, Arqueología, núm. 43, México, inah,
pp. 197-215.
• Anguiano, Marina y Matilde Chapa
1982. “Estratificación social en Tlaxcala durante el
siglo xvi,” en Pedro Carrasco y Johanna Broda, La
estratificación social en la Mesoamérica prehispánica,
México, inah, pp. 118-156.
• Angulo, Andrés
1965. “Informe sobre el Cerro Cuautzi,” en Ángel
García Cook y Beatriz Leonor Merino Carrión
(eds.), Antología de Tlaxcala, México, inah, vol. I,
pp. 123-130.
• Beristain, Francisco
2004. “Santiago Tepeticpac, Tlaxcala: importancia
arqueológica”, Arqueología, núm. 32, México, inah,
pp. 28-47.
• Brito, Baltazar
2011. “Huexotzingo en el siglo xvi: transformaciones
de un altépetl mesoamericano”, tesis de doctorado,
México, ffyl-unam.
• Carballo, David, Jennifer Carballo y Hector Neff
2007. “Formative and Classic Period Obsidian
Procurement in Central Mexico: A Compositional
Study Using Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled
Plasma-Mass Spectrometry”, Latin American
Antiquity, núm. 18, pp. 23-43.
• Carrasco, D. y S. Sessions (eds.)
2007. Cave, City, and Eagle´s Nest: An Interpretive
Journey through the Mapa de Cuauhtinchan No. 2,
Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press.
• Clark, John E.
2003. “A Review of Twentieth-Century Mesoamerican
Studies”, en Kenneth G. Hirth (ed.), Mesoamerican
Lithic Technology: Experimentation and
Interpretation, Salt Lake City, University of Utah
Press, pp. 15-54.
• Cobean, R. H.
2002. Un mundo de obsidiana: minería y comercio
de un vidrio volcánico en el México antiguo,
México, inah /University of Pittsburgh.
• Contreras, Eduardo
2007. “Programa 2007 de mantenimiento mayor del
sitio arqueológico de Tepeticpac, Tlaxcala” (mecanuscrito),
Archivo Técnico, Sección de Arqueología,
Centro inah Tlaxcala.
• Chance, John K.
1996. “The Barrios of Colonial Tecali: Patronage,
Kinship, and Territorial Relations in a Central
Mexican Community”, Ethnology, núm. 35,
pp. 107-139.
2000. “The Noble House in Colonial Puebla,
Mexico: Descent, Inheritance, and the Nahua
Tradition”, American Anthropologist, New Series,
núm. 102, pp. 485-502.
• Charlton, Thomas H., Deborah L. Nichols y Cynthia
Otis Charlton
1991. “Aztec Craft Production and Specialization:
Archaeological Evidence from the City-State of
Otumba, Mexico”, World Archaeology, núm. 23,
pp. 98-114.
• Charlton, Thomas H. y Michael W. Spence
1982. “Obsidian Exploitation and Civilization in the
Basin of Mexico”, Anthropology, núm. 6, pp. 7-86.
• Durán, D.
2006 [1579]. Historia de las Indias de Nueva
España e Islas de la Tierra Firme, México, Porrúa.
• Dyckerhoff, Ursula y Hanns J. Prem
1982. “La estratificación social en Huexotzinco”, en
Pedro Carrasco y Johanna Broda (eds.), Estratificación social en la Mesoamérica prehispánica,
México, inah, pp. 157-180.
• Ebert, Claire, Mark Dennison, Kenneth G. Hirth,
Sarah B. McClure y Douglas J. Kennett
2014. “Formative Period Obsidian Exchange along
the Pacific Coast of Mesoamerica”, Archaeometry,
núm. DOI: 10.1111/arcm.12095.
• Escuela Nacional de Conservación, Restauración y
Museografía (encr y m)
2000. “Sitio Arqueológico de Tepeticpac. Acrópolis
del Cerro Cuauti, Tlaxcala”, reporte de la encrym
(mecanuscrito), Archivo Técnico del inah, México.
• Fargher, Lane F., Richard E. Blanton, Verenice Y.
Heredia, John Millhauser, Nezahualcoyotl Xiutecuhtli y
Lisa Overholtzer
2010. “Tlaxcallan: The Archaeology of an Ancient
Republic in the New World”, Antiquity, núm. 84,
pp. 1-15.
• García Cook, Ángel
1997. “Una secuencia cultural para Tlaxcala,” en
Ángel García Cook, Beatriz Leonor Merino Carrión
(eds.), Antología de Tlaxcala, México, inah (Antologías),
vol. II, , pp. 57-89.
• García Cook, Ángel y Beatriz Leonor Merino Carrión
1997. “Integración y consolidación de los Señoríos
Tlaxcala, siglos ix a xvi,” en Ángel García Cook y
Leonor Merino Carrión (eds.), Antología de Tlaxcala,
México, inah, vol. IV, pp. 231-249.
• García Cook, Ángel y Raciel Mora López
1974. “Tetepetla: un sitio fortificado del Clásico en
Tlaxcala”, Comunicaciones, núm. 10, pp. 23-30.
• Gibson, C.
1967. Tlaxcala in the Sixteenth Century, Stanford,
Stanford University Press.
• Guevara, Jorge y Héctor M. Robinson
1999. “Proyecto: excavaciones en unidades residenciales
y domésticas en Tepeticpac. Informe de la
segunda temporada de campo. Otoño de 1999”
(mecanuscrito), Archivo Técnico del inah,
México.
• Hammond, Norman
1972. “Obsidian Trade Routes in the Mayan Area”,
Science, núm. 178, pp. 1092-1093.
• Healan, Dan M.
1993. “Local versus Non-local Obsidian Exchange at
Tula and its Implications for Post-formative Mesoamerica”,
World Archaeology, núm. 24, pp. 449-466.
• Hicks, Frederic
2009. “Land and Succession in the Indigenous Noble
Houses of Sixteenth-Century Tlaxcala”, Ethnohistory,
núm. 56, pp. 569-588.
• Hirth, Kenneth G.
1998. “The Distributional Approach: A New Way to
Identify Marketplace Exchange in the Archaeological
Record”, Current Anthropology, núm. 39,
pp. 451-476.
2008. “The Economy of Supply: Modeling Obsidian
Procurement and Craft Provisioning at a Central
Mexican Urban Center”, Latin American Antiquity,
núm. 19, pp. 435-458.
• Kabata, Shigeru
2010. “La dinámica regional entre el valle de
Toluca y las áreas circundantes: intercambio antes y
después de la caída de Teotihuacan”, ponencia en el
Sexto Congreso Colombiano de Arqueología, Santa
Martha, Colombia.
• López, Aurelio y Kenneth G. Hirth
2012. “Terrazguero Smallholders and the Function
of Agricultural Tribute in Sixteenth-Century
Tepeaca, Mexico”, Mexican Studies / Estudios
Mexicanos, núm. 28, pp. 73-93.
• López, Aurelio y Ramón Santacruz
2013. “Proyecto Arqueológico Tepeticpac, Informe
de la Primera Temporada de Campo 2012” (mecanuscrito),
Archivo Técnico del inah, México.
• Martínez, H.
1984. Tepeaca en el siglo xvi: tenencia de la tierra y
organización de un señorío, México, ciesas (Ediciones
de la Casa Chata, 21).
1994. Codiciaban la tierra: el despojo agrario de
los señoríos de Tecamachalco y Quecholac (Puebla,
1520-1650), México, ciesas.
• Millhauser, John K., Enrique Rodríguez y M. D.
Glascock
2011. “Testing the Accuracy of Portable X-ray
Fluorescence to Study Aztec and Colonial Obsidian Supply at Xaltocan, Mexico”, Journal of Archaeological
Science, núm. 38, pp. 3141-3152.
• Moholy-Nagy, Hattula, Frank Asaro y Fred H. Stross
1984. “Tikal Obsidian: Sources and Typology”,
American Antiquity, núm. 49, pp. 104-117.
• Muñoz Camargo, D.
1998 [1580]. Historia de Tlaxcala (Ms. 210 de la
Biblioteca Nacional de París), Tlaxcala, Universidad
Autónoma de Tlaxcala.
• Olivera, M.
1978. Pillis y macehuales, las formaciones sociales
y los modos de producción de Tecali del siglo xii al
xvi, México, ciesas (Ediciones de la Casa Chata, 6).
• Pastrana, Alejandro
2002. “Variation at the Source: Obsidian Exploitation
at Sierra de las Navajas, Mexico”, en Kenneth
G. Hirth y Bradford W. Andrews (eds.), Pathways to
Prismatic Blades: A Study in Mesoamerican
Obsidian-Core Technology, Los Ángeles, The
Cotsen Institute of Archaeology-University of
California (Monograph 45).
2007. La distribución de la obsidiana de la Triple
Alianza en la cuenca de México, México, inah
(Científica, 517, Serie Arqueología).
• Perkins, Stephen M.
2007. “The House of Guzmán: An Indigenous
Cacicazgo in Early Colonial Central Mexico”,
Culture and Agriculture, núm. 29, pp. 25-42.
• Reyes, L.
1988. Cuauhtinchan del siglo xii al xvi: formación y
desarrollo histórico de un señorío prehispánico,
México, fce.
• Santacruz, Ramón y Aurelio López
2011. “Proyecto Arqueológico Tepeticpac, Tlaxcala”
(mecanuscrito), Archivo Técnico del inah, México.
• Santley, Robert S.
1984. “Obsidian Exchange, Economic Stratification,
and the Evolution of Complex Society in the Basin
of Mexico”, en Kenneth G. Hirth (ed.), Trade and
Exchange in Early Mesoamerica, Albuquerque,
University of New Mexico Press, pp. 43-86.
• Smith, Michael E., A. L. Burke, Timothy S. Hare y
Michael D. Glascock
2007. “Sources of Imported Obsidian at Postclassic
Sites in the Yautepec Valley, Morelos: A Characterization
Study Using XRF and inaa”, Latin American
Antiquity, núm. 18, pp. 429-450.
• Snow, Dean R.
1969. “Ceramic Sequence and Settlement Location
in Pre-Hispanic Tlaxcala”, American Antiquity,
núm. 34, pp. 131-145.
• Spence, Michael W.
1987. “The Scale and Structure of Obsidian Production
in Teotihuacan”, en Emily McClung de Tapia y
Evelyn Childs Rattray (eds.), Teotihuacán: nuevos
datos, nuevas síntesis, nuevos problemas, México,
iia-unam, pp. 429-450.
• Tschohl, P. y H. J. Nickel
1972. Catálogo arqueológico y etnohistórico de
Puebla-Tlaxcala (edición preliminar A-C), Colonia,
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Mexiko-Projekt.
• Yoneda, K.
1991. Los mapas de Cuauhtinchan y la historia
cartográfica prehispánica, México, ciesas.
• Zeitlin, Robert N.
1982. “Toward a More Comprehensive Model of
Interregional Commodity Distribution: Political
Variables and Prehistoric Obsidian Procurement in
Mesoamerica”, American Antiquity, núm. 47,
pp. 260-275
Evaluating carbon offsets from forestry and energy projects
Under the Kyoto Protocol, industrial countries accept caps on their emissions of greenhouse gases. They are permitted to acquire offsetting emissions reductions from developing countries - which do not have emissions limitations - to assist in complying with these caps. Because these emissions reductions are defined against a hypothetical baseline, practical issues arise in ensuring that the reductions are genuine. Forestry-related emissions reduction projects are often thought to present greater difficulties in measurement and implementation, than energy-related emissions reduction projects. The author discusses how project characteristics affect the process for determining compliance with each of the criteria for qualifying. Those criteria are: 1) Additionality. Would these emissions reductions not have taken place without the project? 2) Baseline and systems boundaries (leakage). What would business-as-usual emissions have been without the project? And in this comparison, how broad should spatial, and temporal system boundaries be? 3) Measurement (or sequestration). How accurately can we measure actual with-project emissions levels? 4) Duration or permanence. Will the project have an enduring mitigating effect? 5) Local impact. Will the project benefit its neighbors? For all the criteria except permanence, it is difficult to find generic distinctions between land use change and forestry and energy projects, since both categories comprise diverse project types. The important distinctions among projects have to do with such things as: a) The level and distribution of the project's direct financial benefits. b) How much the project is integrated with the larger system. c) The project components'internal homogeneity and geographic dispersion. d) The local replicability of project technologies. Permanence is an issue specific to land use and forestry projects. The author describes various approaches to ensure permanence, or adjust credits for duration: the ton-year approach (focusing on the benefits from deferring climatic damage, and rewarding longer deferral); the combination approach (bundling current land use change and forestry emissions reductions with future reductions in the buyer's allowed amount); a technology-acceleration approach; and an insurance approach.Montreal Protocol,Environmental Economics&Policies,Climate Change,Decentralization,Global Environment Facility,Environmental Economics&Policies,Energy and Environment,Carbon Policy and Trading,Montreal Protocol,Climate Change
Empirical evidence for alternative growth models : time series results.
Neue Wachstumstheorie; Zeitreihenanalyse; Theorie;
Learning Obstacles of Bachelor of Science in Office Administration Students in Shorthand
This study explores the learning challenges faced by Bachelor of Science in Office Administration (BSOA) students at Camarines Sur Polytechnic Colleges in mastering shorthand—a vital skill for efficient transcription in professional settings. Guided by the Skill Acquisition Theory of Fitts and Posner (1967), the research focuses on identifying difficulties in dictation and transcription and suggests ways to improve student proficiency. Despite technological advancements, shorthand remains relevant, though students often struggle due to limited practice and inadequate instructional support. Using a descriptive approach, the researchers surveyed 187 second-year BSOA students through questionnaires, with data analyzed using weighted mean and percentage techniques. Results show that while students demonstrate strong skills in dictation and transcription, they still encounter key challenges. These include difficulty with unfamiliar words, lack of focus during dictation, and poor penmanship leading to inaccurate strokes. These obstacles hinder mastery of shorthand. The study concludes that these issues are primarily due to insufficient exposure and practice. To address this, the researchers recommend implementing specialized training programs, incorporating real-life scenarios in instruction, organizing student focus groups, and conducting frequent assessments to monitor progress
Landscape-painter as landscape-gardener : the case of Alfred Parsons R.A.
In 2 vols.Available from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:DXN016830 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreSIGLEGBUnited Kingdo
Roads, lands, markets, and deforestation : a spatial model of land use in Belize
Rural roads promote economic development but also facilitate deforestation. To explore the tradeoffs between development and environmental damage posed by road building, the authors develop and estimate a spatially explicit model of land use. This model takes into account location and land characteristics and predicts land use at each point on the landscape. They find that: (a) market access and distance to roads strongly affect the probability of agricultural use, especially for commercial agriculture; (b) high slopes, poor drainage, and low soil fertility discourage both commercial and semi subsistence agriculture; and (c) semi-subsistence agriculture is especially sensitive to soil acidity and lack nitrogen (confirming anthropological findings that subsistence farmers are shrewd judges of soil). Spatially explicit models are analytically powerful because they exploit rich spatial variation in causal variables, including the precise siting of roads. They are useful for policy because they can pinpoint threats to particular critical habitats and watersheds. This model is a descendant of the venerable von Thunen model. It assumes that land will tend to be devoted to its highest-value use, taking into account tenure and other constraints. The value of a plot for a particular use depends on the land's physical productivity for that use and the farmgate prices of relevant inputs and outputs. A reduced-form, multinomial logit specification of this model calculates implicit values of land in alternative uses as a function of land location and characteristics. The resulting equations can then be used for prediction or analysis. The model was applied to cross-sectional data for 1989-92 for Belize, a forested country currently experiencing rapid expansion of both subsistence and commercial agriculture. A geographic information system was used to manage the spatial data and extract variables based on the three kilometer sample grid. Three land uses were distinguished:"natural"vegetation, comprising forests, woodlands, wetlands, and savanna; semi-subsistence agriculture, comprising traditional milpa (slash-and-burn) cultivation and other nonmechanized cultivation of annual crops; and commercial agriculture, consisting mainly of sugarcane, pasture, citrus, and mechanized production of corn and kidney beans. Two dimensions of distance to market were distinguished: the distance from each sample point to the road, and on-road travel time to the nearest town. Data on a wide variety of land and soil characteristics were also used.Wetlands,Water Conservation,Environmental Economics&Policies,Climate Change,Land Use and Policies,Forestry,Environmental Economics&Policies,Climate Change,Energy and Environment,Wetlands
Can we hear what they heard?: the effect of orality upon a markan reading-event
This dissertation arises from recent investigations in the field of orality and the potential that it has for Markan studies. Chapter one identifies the epistemological divide which separates a contemporary reading experience from one situated in the first century. Further, chapter one will focus this hermeneutical question upon the difference in how a text functions between a modern and an ancient literary critic; specifically, modern meaning versus ancient effect. Chapter two seeks to survey the nature of communication in the New Testament world and how this information was created, stored, and conveyed to its audience. Furthermore, it will seek to identify what skills were required by the manuscript’s creator, reader, and receiver(s). The goal is to define and develop the nature of a reading-event of antiquity. Chapter three will continue our prolegomena to method with a description of the complex inter-relationship between a reader, an audience, and a manuscript in the ancient world. It will be defined as a partnership whereby their respective functions commingle as they create a communal reading-event. Next, an oral hermeneutic will be described in two parts. First, it will present a summary of the historical reading-event constructed from the previous chapters. Then, an oral/performative approach will be developed under the rubric of a hypothetical reading-effect. It will be an attempt to recreate the oral/aural aspects which alert the reader and the listeners to the story’s movement. Furthermore, it will attempt to document the affective value of a hearer’s encounter with the narrative. Finally, chapter four will put into practice the aforementioned method to recreate a reading-event of the Second Gospel. We will explore how the text of Mark provides keys to the reader for how to orally present the Second Gospel. At the same time, our reading model will assist us to determine how the reading-event itself produces a controlled reading-effect upon a listening audience. Throughout the detailed work on Mark, we will attempt to show how an oral perspective reveals distinctive features which otherwise might be left unheard to silent readers
- …
