1,721,196 research outputs found
Experimento com citrus Kumquat Meiwa
No full textExperimento com citrus Kumquat Meiwa. Novidade no Brasil e muito apreciados
117. Meiwa-jiken
No full textIwao Seiichi, Iyanaga Teizō, Ishii Susumu, Yoshida Shōichirō, Fujimura Jun'ichirō, Fujimura Michio, Yoshikawa Itsuji, Akiyama Terukazu, Iyanaga Shōkichi, Matsubara Hideichi. 117. Meiwa-jiken. In: Dictionnaire historique du Japon, volume 14, 1988. Lettres L et M (1) p. 66
Comparison of canker disease development in ‘Meiwa’ and ‘Newhall’.
No full text<p>(A) Leaves of ‘Meiwa’ and ‘Newhall’ were pinprick-inoculated with citrus canker bacterium and periodically observed within 7 d, and the pictures were taken at 5 and 7 days post inoculation (DPI). (B) Quantitative comparison of the bacterial population at the inoculation sites of ‘Meiwa’ and ‘Newhall’ leaves after 6 days inoculation.</p
Number of differentially expressed genes in ‘Meiwa’ and ‘Newhall’ after statistical analysis.
No full text<p>(A) Number of significantly upregulated and downregulated genes in ‘Meiwa’ and ‘Newhall’. (B–C) Venn diagram shows the number of upregulated (B) and downregulated (C) genes that are expressed in common or in special between ‘Meiwa’ and ‘Newhall’.</p
Tissue Culture Studies on Fortunella polyandra ‘Nagami’ and ‘Meiwa’
No full textStudies of Fortunella polyandra ‘Nagami’ and ‘Meiwa’ were carried out to
observe their responses in tissue culture systems. Explant sources investigated
included roots, stems, leaves and cotyledons which were cultured on Murashige and
Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with different combinations and concentrations of
various hormones. The hormones used were naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) and
benzylaminopurine (BAP) at pH 5.8 with a temperature of 23-26°C and a photoperiod
of 16 hours light and 8 hours dark. The pH of the media was also altered to include
4.8, 5.8, 6.8 and 7.8. The various explants were subjected to light and dark treatments
in order to study the morphogenesis of this species. From the results, it was observed
that stem and leaf explants were more responsive than other explants. The best media
for regeneration and callus formation was MS supplemented with 0.5 mg/L NAA and
0.5 mg/L BAP at pH 5.8 for ‘Nagami’ and pH 7.8 for ‘Meiwa’. Regeneration was
achieved via direct organogenesis and also via callus formation. The highest
percentage of shoot formation (40%) was obtained from stem explants (‘Meiwa’)
cultured on MS supplemented with 0.5 mg/L NAA and 0.5 mg/L BAP at pH 7.8
Functional categorization of the common upregulated and downregulated genes in ‘Meiwa’ and ‘Newhall’ based on the GO annotation.
No full text<p>Functional categorization of the common upregulated and downregulated genes in ‘Meiwa’ and ‘Newhall’ based on the GO annotation.</p
Significantly enriched GO terms (adjust <i>P</i><0.05) of specifically regulated genes in ‘Meiwa’ after Singular Enrichment Analysis.
No full text<p>Significantly enriched GO terms (adjust <i>P</i><0.05) of specifically regulated genes in ‘Meiwa’ after Singular Enrichment Analysis.</p
Functional categorization of 380 upregulated and 184 downregulated genes that are specifically regulated in ‘Meiwa’ based on GO annotation.
No full text<p>Functional categorization of 380 upregulated and 184 downregulated genes that are specifically regulated in ‘Meiwa’ based on GO annotation.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
