1,721,249 research outputs found
Fig. 3 in Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis Larvatus (Wurmb, 1787)) Have Unusually High-Pitched Vocalizations
No full textFig. 3. Cumulative curve of mean frequencies of calls in the study. Graph omits the one call that has a frequency <2.7 kHz.Published as part of <i>Srivathsan, Amrita & Meier, Rudolf, 2011, Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis Larvatus (Wurmb, 1787)) Have Unusually High-Pitched Vocalizations, pp. 319-323 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 59 (2)</i> on page 321, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10107765">10.5281/zenodo.10107765</a>
Fig. 1. A in Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis Larvatus (Wurmb, 1787)) Have Unusually High-Pitched Vocalizations
No full textFig. 1. A male proboscis monkey in the Singapore Zoological Gardens.Published as part of <i>Srivathsan, Amrita & Meier, Rudolf, 2011, Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis Larvatus (Wurmb, 1787)) Have Unusually High-Pitched Vocalizations, pp. 319-323 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 59 (2)</i> on page 320, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10107765">10.5281/zenodo.10107765</a>
Fig. S1 in Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis Larvatus (Wurmb, 1787)) Have Unusually High-Pitched Vocalizations
No full textFig. S1. Spectrogram of Call 2: Low frequency vocalization produced by adult male.Published as part of <i>Srivathsan, Amrita & Meier, Rudolf, 2011, Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis Larvatus (Wurmb, 1787)) Have Unusually High-Pitched Vocalizations, pp. 319-323 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 59 (2)</i> on page 322, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10107765">10.5281/zenodo.10107765</a>
Fig. 2. A in Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis Larvatus (Wurmb, 1787)) Have Unusually High-Pitched Vocalizations
No full textFig. 2. A sample spectrogram of a high frequency vocalization of the proboscis monkey, Nasalis larvatus, that shows the harmonic structure of these calls. The fundamental frequency of this call ranges from 3.4–5.4 kHz and the mean frequency is 4.9 kHz.Published as part of <i>Srivathsan, Amrita & Meier, Rudolf, 2011, Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis Larvatus (Wurmb, 1787)) Have Unusually High-Pitched Vocalizations, pp. 319-323 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 59 (2)</i> on page 321, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10107765">10.5281/zenodo.10107765</a>
Two new species of mangrove Dolichopodidae from Bohol Island in the Philippines (Insecta: Diptera) and a checklist of the Dolichopodidae of the Philippines
No full textRamos, Kay, Meier, Rudolf, Nuneza, Olga, Grootaert, Patrick (2018): Two new species of mangrove Dolichopodidae from Bohol Island in the Philippines (Insecta: Diptera) and a checklist of the Dolichopodidae of the Philippines. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 66: 268-276, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.535869
Fig. 3 in Two new species of mangrove Dolichopodidae from Bohol Island in the Philippines (Insecta: Diptera) and a checklist of the Dolichopodidae of the Philippines
No full textFig. 3. Thinophilus lungosetole Ramos & Grootaert sp. nov. Holotype male terminalia. A. genital capsule, ventral view; B. genital capsule, lateral view; C. genital capsule, dorsal view. C: cercus; Ph: phallus; Sur: surstylus.Published as part of Ramos, Kay, Meier, Rudolf, Nuneza, Olga & Grootaert, Patrick, 2018, Two new species of mangrove Dolichopodidae from Bohol Island in the Philippines (Insecta: Diptera) and a checklist of the Dolichopodidae of the Philippines, pp. 268-276 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 66 on page 270, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.535869
Thinophilus Wahlberg 1844
No full textGenus Thinophilus Wahlberg, 1844 Thinophilus Wahlberg, 1844: 37. Type species: Rhaphium flavipalpe Zetterstedt, 1843 (monotypy). Parathinophilus Parent, 1932: 161. Type species: Parathinophilus expolitus Parent, 1932 (monotypy).Published as part of Ramos, Kay, Meier, Rudolf, Nuneza, Olga & Grootaert, Patrick, 2018, Two new species of mangrove Dolichopodidae from Bohol Island in the Philippines (Insecta: Diptera) and a checklist of the Dolichopodidae of the Philippines, pp. 268-276 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 66 on page 269, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.535869
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Figure 1 in Future of DNA-based insect monitoring
No full textFigure 1. Sources of insect DNA and common applications. Abbreviation: eDNA, environmental DNA.Published as part of Chua, Physilia Y.S., Bourlat, Sarah J., Ferguson, Cameron, Korlevic, Petra, Zhao, Leia, Ekrem, Torbjørn, Meier, Rudolf & Lawniczak, Mara K.N., 2023, Future of DNA-based insect monitoring, pp. 531-544 in Trends in Genetics 39 (7) on page 536, DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2023.02.012, http://zenodo.org/record/829855
- …
