1,721,126 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Role of the Ipsilateral Primary Motor Cortex in the Visuo-Motor Network during Fine Contractions and Accurate Performance

    Full text link
    It is widely recognized that continuous sensory feedback plays a crucial role in accurate motor control in everyday life. Feedback information is used to adapt force output and to correct errors. While primary motor cortex contralateral to the movement (cM1) plays a dominant role in this control, converging evidence supports the idea that ipsilateral primary motor cortex (iM1) also directly contributes to hand and finger movements. Similarly, when visual feedback is available, primary visual cortex (V1) and its interactions with the motor network also become important for accurate motor performance. To elucidate this issue, we performed and integrated behavioral and electroencephalography (EEG) measurements during isometric compression of a compliant rubber bulb, at 10% and 30% of maximum voluntary contraction, both with and without visual feedback. We used a semi-blind approach (functional source separation (FSS)) to identify separate functional sources of mu-frequency (8-13Hz) EEG responses in cM1, iM1 and V1. Here for the first time, we have used orthogonal FSS to extract multiple sources, by using the same functional constraint, providing the ability to extract different sources that oscillate in the same frequency range but that have different topographic distributions. We analyzed the single-trial timecourses of mu power event-related desynchronization (ERD) in these sources and linked them with force measurements to understand which aspects are most important for good task performance. Whilst the amplitude of mu power was not related to contraction force in any of the sources, it was able to provide information on performance quality. We observed stronger ERDs in both contralateral and ipsilateral motor sources during trials where contraction force was most consistently maintained. This effect was most prominent in the ipsilateral source, suggesting the importance of iM1 to accurate performance. This ERD effect was sustained throughout the duration of visual feedback trials, but only present at the start of no feedback trials, consistent with more variable performance in the absence of feedback. Overall, we found that the behavior of the ERD in iM1 was the most informative aspect concerning the accuracy of the contraction performance, and the ability to maintain a steady level of contraction. This new approach of using FSS to extract multiple orthogonal sources provides the ability to investigate both contralateral and ipsilateral nodes of the motor network without the need for additional information (e.g. electromyography). The enhanced signal-to-noise ratio provided by FSS opens the possibility of extracting complex EEG features on an individual trial basis, which is crucial for a more nuanced understanding of fine motor performance, as well as for applications in brain-computer interfacing

    fMRI characterisation of widespread brain networks relevant for behavioural variability in fine hand motor control with and without visual feedback

    No full text
    A bilateral visuo-parietal-motor network is responsible for fine control of hand movements. However, the sub-regions which are devoted to maintenance of contraction stability and how these processes fluctuate with trial-quality of task execution and in the presence/absence of visual feedback remains unclear. We addressed this by integrating behavioural and fMRI measurements during right-hand isometric compression of a compliant rubber bulb, at 10% and 30% of maximum voluntary contraction, both with and without visual feedback of the applied force. We quantified single-trial behavioural performance during 1) the whole task period and 2) stable contraction maintenance, and regressed these metrics against the fMRI data to identify the brain activity most relevant to trial-by-trial fluctuations in performance during specific task phases. fMRI-behaviour correlations in a bilateral network of visual, premotor, primary motor, parietal and inferior frontal cortical regions emerged during performance of the entire feedback task, but only in premotor, parietal cortex and thalamus during the stable contraction period. The trials with the best task performance showed increased bilaterality and amplitude of fMRI responses. With feedback, stronger BOLD-behaviour coupling was found during 10% compared to 30% contractions. Only a small subset of regions in this network were weakly correlated with behaviour without feedback, despite wider network activated during this task than in the presence of feedback. These findings reflect a more focused network strongly coupled to behavioural fluctuations when providing visual feedback, whereas without it the task recruited widespread brain activity almost uncoupled from behavioural performance

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    fMRI characterization of intrinsic brain networks relevant for motor control with and without visual feedback by fractal dimension

    No full text
    The bilateral visuo-parietal-motor network is responsible for fine control of hand movements. However, the subregions devoted to maintaining contraction stability in the presence/absence of visual feedback remain unclear. It is widely recognized that continuous sensory feedback plays a crucial role in accurate motor control in everyday life. Feedback information is used to adapt force output and to correct errors. While the primary motor cortex contralateral to the movement (cM1) plays a dominant role in this control, converging evidence supports the idea that the ipsilateral primary motor cortex (iM1) also directly contributes to hand and finger movements. Similarly, when visual feedback is available, the primary visual cortex (V1) and the visuospatial network and their interactions with the motor network are essential for accurate motor performance. To clarify this problem and investigate the regions involved in a visuomotor task, we performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements during isometric compression of a compliant rubber bulb, at 10% of maximum voluntary contraction, both with (visuomotor task) and without visual feedback (motor task). Here, by using a multivariate approach focusing on intrinsic connectivity between voxels through group ICA of fMRI Toolbox (GIFT), we have answered the following two main questions: 1) which are the networks involved during a motor task (i.e. without visual feedback) and a visuomotor task (i.e. with visual feedback)? 2) Is there any hemodynamic signal complexity difference between the visuomotor and the motor task? Interestingly, we have found that during the visuomotor task, the involvement of the visuospatial network (FEF), the ipsilateral primary motor area (iM1), the contralateral primary motor area (cM1), the sensorimotor network (SMN) the Executive Control Network (ExCN), the Silence Network (SN), the Default Mode Network (DMN), the Basal Ganglia (BG), the Cerebellum (Cb) and Precuneus are essential for the fine motor control of the movement while maintaining the grip force level indicated by the visual feedback together with higher complexity estimated by Higuchi's Fractal Dimension. The study shows that the brain networks show greater hemodynamic complexity in the presence of visual feedback, due to the processing of the visual stimulus and the maintenance of the required level of force

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore