1,720,997 research outputs found

    L'eredità di Babele. Situazioni e percorsi di letteratura comparata

    No full text
    Parole Chiave: LETTERATURA COMPARATA. LETTERATURA EUROPEA. TRADUZIONE LETTERARIA. TEORIA DELLA LETTERATURA. Una selezione di brani che introducono al pensiero comparatistico attraverso le riflesisoni di alcuni dei piu' insigni studiosi mondiali. Prendendo le mosse dalle questioni di definizione e di metodologia della letteratura comparata, attraverso l'idea di letteratura nazionale e di letteratura europea in rapporto alla concezione di Weltliteratur, il volume giunge alle prospettive attuali e ai nuovi interessi della disciplina. Comprende saggi di: G. Steiner, U. Weisstein, Ch. Bernheimer, E.R. Curtius, H.H. Remak, J. Leerssen, S. Bassnett, U. Eco

    Greater occipital nerve block for surgical resection of major infiltrating lesions of the posterior scalp

    No full text
    For the majority of scalp lesions, local anesthesia is adequate. In patients with more advanced lesions and who thus require sacrifice of a larger area of skin, general anesthesia is required but might be risky because of comorbid illness and/or advanced age, and surgery is sometimes abandoned. In cases with posterior scalp location, we suggest greater occipital nerve block–assisted resection. Since its first description by Bogduk,1 greater occipital nerve block has been used in neurosurgery as a part of anesthesia for supratentorial craniotomies, for chronic cluster headache,2 and to reduce postoperative occipital headache and posterior neck pain after thyroid surgery.3 To the best of our knowledge, greater occipital nerve block has not been systematically suggested for major oncologic scalp surgery

    Lezioni su Petrarca

    No full text

    «Il pianeta irritabile» di Paolo Volponi tra fantasie metamorfiche e millenarismo

    No full text
    Il saggio propone un'analisi del Pianeta irritabile di Paolo Volpon

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore