1,721,018 research outputs found
The Ovaherero and Nama Peoples v. Germany - Declaration of Matthias Goldmann before the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
No full textThis declaration was filed before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in case Civ. No. 17-0062 (Ovaherero and Nama peoples et al. v. Germany). Based on archival research, the declaration provides estimates of the financial benefits of Germany derived from the suppression of the Ovaherero and Nama, and specifically from the confiscations of property belonging to the indigenous population as well as their subjection to forced labor during and after the 1904 genocide. Further, the declaration argues that the respective actions of Germany violated international law at the time. When the Germans arrived in what is today Namibia, they did not find a terra nullius that could have been occupied, but entered into treaty relationships with the indigenous tribes exercising sovereign control over their territories at the time. Moreover, at the turn of the 20th century, international law knew a minimum standard of humane treatment, which the German government violated by its acts before, during and after the 1904 uprising
Karlsruhe leitet QE-Fall an Luxemburg weiter: Summer of Love
No full textMatthias Goldmann über die Unterschiede zum OMT-Fall und was die europäischen Richter jetzt klären müssen
Integrierte europäische Finanzaufsicht
No full textMatthias Goldmann über die möglichen rechtlichen Hindernisse für eine weitere Zentralisierung von Aufsichtskompetenzen
Kryptowährungen durch „Forward Guidance" steuern
No full textMatthias Goldmann und Grygoriy Pustovit: Ein „Sandbox"-Ansatz für die Finan.zaufsicht könnte ein Anfang sei
Ganzheitlicher Ansatz für EZB-Geldpolitik und Bankenaufsicht
No full textMatthias Goldmann: Die gegenwärtigen EMU-Vorschriften schreiben nicht zwingend die Trennung von Geldpolitik und Finanzaufsicht vor
Integrated european financial supervision
No full textMatthias Goldmann about possible legal obstacles in the way to a further centralization of supervisory competences
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Alle Jahre wieder: Die Geldpolitik der EZB vor Gericht
No full textMatthias Goldmann: Das Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs zu den Anleihenkäufen der Europäischen Zentralbank zeigt die rationalisierende Wirkung rechtlicher Diskurse
A holistic approach to ECB monetary policy and prudential supervision
No full textMatthias Goldmann: current legal framework of EMU does not require separation of monetary policy and financial supervision
- …
