1,720,976 research outputs found
Natural History of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy
Full text linkArrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC) is a heart muscle disease characterized by a scarred ventricular myocardium with a distinctive propensity to ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death, especially in young athletes. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) represents the best characterized variant of AC, with a peculiar genetic background, established diagnostic criteria and management guidelines; however, the identification of nongenetic causes of the disease, combined with the common demonstration of biventricular and left-dominant forms, has led to coin the term of "arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy", to better define the broad spectrum of the disease phenotypic expressions. The genetic basis of AC are pathogenic mutations in genes encoding the cardiac desmosomes, but also non-desmosomal and nongenetic variants were reported in patients with AC, some of which showing overlapping phenotypes with other non-ischemic diseases. The natural history of AC is characterized by VAs and progressive deterioration of cardiac performance. Different phases of the disease are recognized, each characterized by pathological and clinical features. Arrhythmic manifestations are age-related: Ventricular fibrillation and SCD are more frequent in young people, while sustained ventricular tachycardia is more common in the elderly, depending on the different nature of the myocardial lesions. This review aims to address the genetic basis, the clinical course and the phenotypic variants of AC
Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy and Sports Activity
No full textArrhythmogenic right-ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetically determined heart disease characterized by progressive myocyte death and substitution by fibrofatty tissue. Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias may occur during the course of the disease and are distinctively triggered by sports activity: for this reason, ARVC is one of the leading causes of sudden death in the athlete. Early identification of affected athletes by preparticipation screening in the pre-symptomatic phase is essential, but differential diagnosis with the athlete's heart may be challenging. Variants with predominant involvement of the left ventricle are difficult to diagnose unless cardiac magnetic resonance is performed. Athletes with overt ARVC or asymptomatic carriers of pathological gene mutations, including those with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, should refrain from competitive sports, while a moderate-intensity recreational physical activity appears safe
Multimodality imaging in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy - From diagnosis to management
No full textArrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (AC), an inherited cardiac disorder characterized by myocardial fibrofatty replacement, carries a significant risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular arrhythmias. A comprehensive multimodality imaging approach, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), and cardiac computed tomography (CCT), allows for accurate diagnosis, effective risk stratification, vigilant monitoring, and appropriate intervention, leading to improved patient outcomes and the prevention of SCD. Echocardiography is primary tool ventricular morphology and function assessment, CMR provides detailed visualization, CCT is essential in early stages for excluding congenital anomalies and coronary artery disease. Echocardiography is preferred for follow-up, with CMR capturing changes over time. The strategic use of these imaging methods aids in confirming AC, differentiating it from other conditions, tracking its progression, managing complications, and addressing end-stage scenarios
Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy—Current Treatment and Future Options
Full text linkArrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inheritable heart muscle disease characterised pathologically by fibrofatty myocardial replacement and clinically by ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although, in its original description, the disease was believed to predominantly involve the right ventricle, biventricular and left-dominant variants, in which the myocardial lesions affect in parallel or even mostly the left ventricle, are nowadays commonly observed. The clinical management of these patients has two main purposes: the prevention of SCD and the control of arrhythmic and heart failure (HF) events. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the only proven lifesaving treatment, despite significant morbidity because of device-related complications and inappropriate shocks. Selection of patients who can benefit the most from ICD therapy is one of the most challenging issues in clinical practice. Risk stratification in ACM patients is mostly based on arrhythmic burden and ventricular dysfunction severity, although other clinical features resulting from electrocardiogram and imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance may have a role. Medical therapy is crucial for treatment of VAs and the prevention of negative ventricular remodelling. In this regard, the efficacy of novel anti-HF molecules and drugs acting on the inflammatory pathway in patients with ACM is, to date, unknown. Catheter ablation represents an effective strategy to treat ventricular tachycardia relapses and recurrent ICD shocks. The present review will address the current strategies for prevention of SCD and treatment of VAs and HF in patients with ACM
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in clinical practice
No full textOvercoming lead-related complications, the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) represents the greatest advancement in the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Due to the absence of leads within the body, the S-ICD requires an innovative approach for sensing of subcutaneous signals and defibrillation. The aim of this review is to analyze the current evidence regarding patient selection, technical aspects such as the implant technique, programming and follow-up, as well as complications and troubleshooting of this innovative technology
Arrhythmogenic Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Genotype-Phenotype Correlations and New Diagnostic Criteria
Full text linkArrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inherited heart muscle disease characterized by loss of ventricular myocardium and fibrofatty replacement, which predisposes to scar-related ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death, particularly in the young and athletes. Although in its original description the disease was characterized by an exclusive or at least predominant right ventricle (RV) involvement, it has been demonstrated that the fibrofatty scar can also localize in the left ventricle (LV), with the LV lesion that can equalize or even overcome that of the RV. While the right-dominant form is typically associated with mutations in genes encoding for desmosomal proteins, other (non-desmosomal) mutations have been showed to cause the biventricular and left-dominant variants. This has led to a critical evaluation of the 2010 International Task Force criteria, which exclusively addressed the right phenotypic manifestations of ACM. An International Expert consensus document has been recently developed to provide upgraded criteria (“the Padua Criteria”) for the diagnosis of the whole spectrum of ACM phenotypes, particularly left-dominant forms, highlighting the use of cardiac magnetic resonance. This review aims to offer an overview of the current knowledge on the genetic basis, the phenotypic expressions, and the diagnosis of left-sided variants, both biventricular and left-dominant, of ACM
The impact of the Italian law mandating an automatic external defibrillator in all sports venues on sudden cardiac arrest resuscitation rates
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
