1,721,203 research outputs found
¿Odio a la democracia ...y al rol público de la educación? Sobre Rancière, democracia y educación
No full textstatus: Publishe
Subjetivación gubernamental, política y pedagógica. Foucault con Rancière
No full textstatus: Publishe
Governmental, political and pedagogic subjectivation : Foucault with Rancière
No full textstatus: Publishe
Bewaar als afbeelding
No full text'Save as Image'
Monuments that look like images (of monuments). Photos that depict monuments. Photos that depict monuments that look like photos of monuments. Photos that depict photos. Images in which all dimensions are reduced to a flat surface. What could be the meaning of that reduction? What does it add?
The idea behind this doctoral study is to question the 'photographer' as a researcher 'in photography'. This narrowing down of the 'artsist' as a researcher 'in the arts' to a photographer, should be seen as an attempt to isolate a clear case of a research in the arts in which the value and meaning of its outcome is independant from the process and the research that proceded it. The study is inspired by early photogrammetry, and the 'automatic' coupling of a photo with the world. Photogrammetry generates meaningful images, and it doesn't need a photographer-author to do so. Recent developments in photography ànd in photogrammetry have corroded the automatic coupling of a photo to the world: they still seem to be linked, but they are not linked 'by birth' anymore. 'Save as Image' searches for the spot where 'research' and 'knowledge production' hide in a kind of imageproduction that acts independent of an author and of the world - that it seems to represent in a meaningful way.status: Publishe
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
