1,720,960 research outputs found
Akar Masalah Konflik Keagamaan di Indonesia
Indonesia dikenal sebagai suatu sosok masyarakat yang pluralistik yang memiliki banyak kemajemukkan dan
keberagaman dalam hal agama, tradisi, keseneian, kebudayaan, cara hidup dan pandangan nilai yang dianut
oleh kelompok-kelompok etnis dalam masyarakat Indonesia. pada suatu sisi pluralistik dalam bangsa Indonesia
bisa menjadi positif dan konstruktif tetapi di sisi lain juga bisa menjadi sebuah kekeuatan yang negative dan
destruktif yang dapat berakibat pada disintegrasi bangsa. kenyataannya sejarah masyarakat adalah multi-complex
yang mengandung religious pluralism. Hal ini adalah realitas, karena itu mau tidak mau kita harus menyesuaikan diri,
dengan mengakui adanya religious pluralism dalam masyarakat Indonesia, yang mengutamakan toleransi dalam
berbagai dimensi kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara.
kata kunci: Pluralisme, Agama, Toleransi.
Abstract:
Indonesia is Known as figure of pluaristic society that has a lot of diversity and diversity in
terms of religion, tradition, art, culture, way of life and view of the values shared by ethnic groups
in Indonesian society. On one side in the pluralistic Indonesian nation can be positive and
constructive, but on the other hand could also be a negative and destructive force that can lead to
national disintegration. In fact the history of society is a multi-complex containing religious
pluralism. This is the reality, because it inevitably we have to adjust, to recognize the religious
pluralism in Indonesian society, that promotes tolerance in various dimensions of national life.
Daftar Pustaka
Buku-Buku
A. Mukti Ali, Ilmu Perbandingan Agama, Dialog, Dakwah dan Misi, INIS, Jakarta, 1992.
Balai Pustaka, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 2005.
Dadang Kahmad, Sosiologi Agama, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung, 2006.
Elly M. Setiadi dan Usman Kolip, Pengantar Sosiologi Pemahaman Fakta dan Gejala
Permasalahan Sosial: Teori, Aplikasi, dan Pemecahannya, Kencana Prenada Media
Group, Jakarta, 2011.
Faisal Ismail, Islam Idealitas Ilahiyah dan Realitas Insaniyah, Tiara Wacana Yogya, Yogyakarta,
1999.
Frithjof Schuon, Mencari Titik Temu Agama-agama, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, 1987.
Hamdan Daulay, Dakwah di Tengah Persoalan Budaya dan Politik, Lesti, Yogyakarta, 2001.
Irving M. Zeitlin, Memahami Kembali Sosiologi, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 1998.
J. Dwi Narwoko dan Bagong Suyanto, Sosiologi Teks Pengantar dan Terapan, Kencana Prenada
Media Group, Jakarta, 2005.
Muhammad Imarah, Islam dan Pluralitas (Perbedaan dan Kemajemukan dalam Bingkai Persatuan),
Gema Insani, Jakarta, 1999.
Robert Lawang, Buku Materi Pokok Pengantar Sosiologi, Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta, 1994.
Soerjono Soekanto, kamus Sosiologi, PT.Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1993.
Internet:
http://suaramerdekawacana.com, diakses pada tanggal 15 Agustus 2016
Membedah Akar Masalah Konflik "SARA" di Tanjung Balai Sumatera Utara, http://www.Kom-
pasiana.com/musniumar/membedah-akar-masalah-konflik-sara-di tanjung-balai-sumatera-utara_
579e716ed47a61b11ffef310
Wewenang dan Tugas Pemerintah dalam Perkembangan Paham Pluralisme Agama
Pluralisme agama dalam kehidupannya di Indonesia adalah suatu realitas, yang berarti adalah pluralitas,
(keberagaman, agama adalah hakikat manusia Indonesia, Indonesia sebagai negara dengan latar belakang
keragaman dihuni oleh sekitar 210 juta penduduk dengan afiliasi agama yang berbeda-
beda. Indonesia adalah negara yang berketuhanan bukan negara agama (sekuler). Hampir semua
agama tumbuh dan berkembang di Indonesia, karenanya pluralisme agama seharusnya menjadi
potensi dan kekuatan konstruktif-transfonnatif, dan bukan potensi destruktif, yang justru mereduksi
hakikat pluralisme itu sendiri. Potensi konstrukstif agama akan berkembang jika setiap umat beragama
menjunjung tinggi nilai toleransi, karena toleransi pada dasarnya adalah upaya untuk menahan
diri agar potensi konflik dapat ditekan. Sebaliknya, potensi destruktif agama akan mengemuka
jika masing-masing komunitas umat beragama mengabaikan nilai toleransi dan kerukunan, dengan
menganggap agamanya paling benar, superior dan memandang inferior terhadap agama lain.
Kata Kunci: Pluralisme, Agama, Toleransi
Abstract:
Religious pluralism in life in Indonesia is a reality, which means is a plurality (diversity, religion is
human nature Indonesia, Indonesia as the state with the background of the diversity inhabited by
approximately 210 million people with a religious affiliation different. Indonesia is a state that a
godless not religious state (secular). Almost all religions grow and develop in lndonesia, hence
religious pluralism should be the potential and power of constructive-transformative, and not
destructive potential, which actually reduces the essence of pluralism itself. The potential for
constructive religion would thrive if every religious community to uphold High values of tolerance,
because tolerance is essentially an effort to hold back the potential conflict could be reduced. On
the contrary, the destructive potential of religion will be raised if each community of religious
people ignore the value of tolerance and harmony, with regard religion truth claims, superior and
looked inferior to other religion.
Daftar Pustaka
Abdul Hakim Garuda Nusantara, "Politik Hukum Nasional", makalah pada Karya Latihan Bantuan
Hukum yang diselenggarakan oleh Yayasan LBH Indonesia dan LBH Surabaya. September
1985.
Abdul Hakim Garuda Nusantara, Politik Hukum Indonesia, Yayasan LBH lndonesia, Jakarta, 1988.
Achmad Ali, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialpridence) termasuk
interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence), Jakarta. Penerbit: Kencana Prenada
Media Group, 2009.
Ahmad Shidqi, Sepotong Kebenaran Milik Alifa. Kanisius, Yogyakarta,2008.
Anis Malik Thoha, Tren Pluralisme Agama. Tinjauan Kritis, Penerbit Perspektif, Jakarta, 2005.
Darji Darmodiharjo dan Shidarta, Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum, Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum
Indonesia. Jakarta. Penerbit: Gramedia Pustaka Umum. 2006.
Frans Bona Sihombing. Demokrasi Pancasila dalam Nilai-nilai Politik (Suatu Analisa Kebudayaan
Politik Indonesia. Erlangga, Jakarta. 1984.
I Nyoman Nurjaya. Pembangunan Hukum Negara dalam Masyarakat Multi Kultur: Perspektif Hukum
Progresif, Jurnal Hukum Progresif UNDIP, Vo1.3 No.2 / Oktober 2007.
Intenrational IDEA (Institute for Democrasy and Electoral Assistance), Penilaian Demokratisasi di
Indonesia. Pengembangan Kapasitas Seri 8. Jakarta; Intemational IDEA, 2000.
Ismaun. Tinjauan Pancasila: Dasar Filsafat Negara Republik Indonesia. Bandung. Penerbit: Carya
Remadja, 1981.
John Hick, A Pluralis View, dalam Four Views on Salvation in a Pluralistic World (Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 1995).
Karlina Helmanita, Pluralisme dan Inklusivisme Islam di Indonesia: Kearah Dialog Lintas Agama,
PBB UIN Jakarta, Jakarta, 2003.
Lawrence E. Harison and Samuel P. Huntington (Editor), Culture Matters, New York: Basic Books,
2000.
Lawrence M. Friedman, Arnerican Latw (The New York-London W W Norton Company, 1984).
Liza Wahyuninto dan Abd. Qadir Muslim. Memburu akar Pluralisme Agama, UIN Maliki Press,
Malang,2010.
M. Lawrence Friedman, The Legal System, A social science perspective. New York: Russel Sage
Foundation, 1975.
Mahfud MD, Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakon Konstitusi, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta,
2010.
Michael P. Todaro dan Stephen C. Smith. Pembangunan Ekonomi di Dunia Ketiga. Alih Bahasa
Haris Munandar, Erlangga, Jakarta, 2004.
Muladi, Menjamin Kepastian, Ketertiban, Penegakan dan Perlindungan Hukum dalam Era Globalisasi.
Demokratisasi, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia, Editor Tafzani,
The Habibie Center, Jakarta, 2002.
Munir Fuadi, Dinamika Teori Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, 2007.
Noor MS Bakry, Pancasila, Yuridis Kenegaraan, Liberty. Yogyakarta, 2008.
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, Relevansi Hukum Pidana adat dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Nasional,
PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2005.
Riyal Ka'bah, Nilai-nilai Pluralisme dalam Islam, Bingkai Gagasan yang berserak, (Ed). Suruin, Penerbit
Nuansa, Bandung, 2005.
Sam M. Chan, Tuti T. Sam, Kebijakan Pendidikan Era Otonomi Daerah, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada,
Jakarta.2007.
Endang Sutrisno, Bunga Rampai Hukum dan Globalisasi. 1996, Editor Ufran, Genta Press, Jakarta,
2007.
Satjipto Raharjo. Ilmu Hukum. Cetakan ke-2, Bandung. Penerbit : Alumni, 1996
PERSPEKTIF AGAMA-AGAMA DI INDONESIA TERHADAP PLURALISME AGAMA
For Indonesia plurality is a fact. To set the required plurality of pluralism. Because, no doubt, contain the seeds of discord plurality, this required tolerance, openness, and equality. Pluralism allows for harmony in society, pluralism encourages freedom, including freedom of religion, and is a pillar of democracy. There is no true democracy without pluralism. Pluralism here means the protection of the state against the rights of its citizens to embrace the religion according to what he believes. Religious pluralism means building tolerance, we must recognizes that any religion with adherents of each have the same rights. So that must be built is feeling and mutual respect between religious communities
Bagi bangsa Indonesia pluralitas itu merupakan kenyataan. Untuk mengatur pluralitas diperlukan pluralisme. Sebab, tidak bisa dipungkiri, pluralitas mengandung bibit perpecahan, inilah diperlukan sikap toleran, keterbukaan, dan kesetaraan. Pluralisme memungkinkan terjadinya kerukunan dalam masyarakat, pluralisme mendorong kebebasan, termasuk kebebasan beragama, dan merupakan pilar demokrasi. Tidak ada demokrasi yang sejati tanpa pluralisme. Pluralisme di sini berarti perlindungan negara terhadap hak-hak warganegaranya untuk memeluk agama sesuai dengan apa yang diyakininya. Pluralisme agama berarti membangun toleransi, kita harus mengakui bahwa setiap agama dengan para pemeluknya masing-masing mempunyai hak yang sama. Maka yang harus dibangun adalah perasaan dan sikap saling menghormati antar pemeluk agam
KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA YANG TERBATAS
This article discusses religious freedom is restricted, the state gives the right to independence freedom to the their citizens for religious affairs. But the implementation in government gives freedom to the wiggle room restrictions of religious freedom. There are so many rules that restrict the rights and freedoms of minorities and is more concerned with the majority, resulting in religious conflicts
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
