1,721,493 research outputs found
Marsh, C C, 2244065
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/401572Surname: MARSH. Given Name(s) or Initials: C C. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 2244065. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: SEA-5085.221218
Item: [2016.0049.33865] "Marsh, C C, 2244065
Marsh, C W, QX7912
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/401595Surname: MARSH. Given Name(s) or Initials: C W. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: QX7912. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 41909.221241
Item: [2016.0049.33888] "Marsh, C W, QX7912
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Marsh, C A Mrs, [No Service Number]
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/401575Surname: MARSH. Given Name(s) or Initials: C A MRS. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: [No Registration Number]. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 12996.221221
Item: [2016.0049.33868] "Marsh, C A Mrs, [No Service Number]
Marsh, C K (Charles Keith), NX44954
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/401584Surname: MARSH. Given Name(s) or Initials: C K (CHARLES KEITH). Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX44954. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 18092.221230
Item: [2016.0049.33877] "Marsh, C K (Charles Keith), NX44954
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Safe data versus safe setting: access to microdata from the British Census
No full textCensus offices are squeezed between users demanding ever more data and concerns about data confidentiality and privacy. They respond by releasing data either in a tightly controlled setting or in a securely anonymised form to prevent identification. These two routes have been chosen for two separate products from the 1991 British Census of Population: the Samples of Anonymised Records and the linked census Longitudinal Study. In this paper the implications of the two policies are compared. In broad terms, ease of access in the former route is traded for fullness of information in the second. In the final sections of the paper, the risks of identification disclosure in both datasets are assessed. /// Les officiels du recensement sont presses entre les utilisateurs exigeant plus de donnees que jamais, et l'inquietude a l'egard de les menaces d'atteinte a la vie privee et a son caractere confidentiel. En reponse, les officiels mettent les donnees en circulation soit dans un environment etroitment controlle, ou alors sous une forme rendue sure et anonyme afin de prevenir toute identification. Ceux sont les deux routes choisies pour deux produits distinct du Recensement de la Population britannique en 1991: les echantillons de donnees rendue anonymes et l'etude enchaine Longitudinal Study (etude longitudinale). Dans cet article, les implications des deux methodes sont comparees. Generalement parlant, la facilite d'acces de la premiere route est troquee contre la richesse d'information de la seconde. Dans les dernier paragraphes, les risques de revelation d'identite sont evalues dans les deux dossiers
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
