1,720,962 research outputs found

    Replication Data for: "Modos de Politização Empresarial no Brasil: autofinanciamento e discurso de “gestor” na política"

    No full text
    Resumo: A eleição de Trump nos EUA e o sucesso de outros empresários tem chamado a atenção para candidatos que autofinanciam suas campanhas. Por que candidatos gastam recursos próprios na política? Postulo que o autofinanciamento é um modo de politização empresarial. Ou seja, candidatos empresários se autofinanciam em maior volume do que outras ocupações profissionais. Testo essa hipótese através da triangulação de métodos: análise quantitativa e qualitativa no caso brasileiro, para 2010, 2014 e 2018, em quatro cargos distintos. Os resultados confirmam a hipótese, a partir de uma série de modelos estatísticos, matching e aplicação de variáveis de controle. Em um segundo momento, estes achados são postos a prova com a aplicação de métodos qualitativos. Os resultados indicam que a trajetória curta dos empresários e discurso como “gestor” que parecem conectar essa ocupação com o autofinanciamento. Palavras-chave: Empresários; autofinanciamento; financiamento eleitoral; matching; triangulação de métodos

    Financiamento eleitoral e representação política no Brasil durante o governo Bolsonaro (2019-2022): entre novos e velhos problemas

    Get PDF
    This paper deals with Brazil’s most recent data on electoral financing. We focus on the results for political representation throughout the Bolsonaro government (2019-2022), in which there were changes promoted by the Legislature (restriction of the use of self-financing of candidates) by the Judiciary (proportionality of resources destined to women and black and brown candidacies); and by the Executive. In the latter case, we explore data that goes beyond the regulation of the Brazilian Electoral Justice and touch on the point of delivery of pork barrel (parliamentary amendments) via the so-called Secret Budget. The results show that, despite significant legal changes, the electoral financing in Brazil continues to be highly unequal. On the side of Bolsonaro’s government, the strategy to deliver resources to his political base was successful in Legislative elections.Este artículo aborda los datos más recientes sobre financiamiento electoral en Brasil. Nos centramos en los resultados para la representación política a lo largo del gobierno de Bolsonaro (2019-2022), en el que hubo cambios impulsados ​​desde el Legislativo (restricción del uso del autofinanciamiento de los candidatos), por el Poder Judicial (proporcionalidad de los recursos destinados a mujeres y candidaturas negras y marrones) y por el Ejecutivo. En este último caso, exploramos datos que van más allá de la regulación de la justicia electoral brasileña y tocamos el punto de entrega del pork barrel (enmiendas parlamentarias) a través del llamado Presupuesto Secreto. Los resultados muestran que, a pesar de importantes cambios legales, el financiamiento electoral en Brasil sigue siendo altamente desigual. Del lado del gobierno de Bolsonaro, la estrategia de entregar recursos a su base política tuvo éxito en las elecciones Legislativas.Este artigo trata dos dados mais recentes sobre financiamento eleitoral no Brasil. Focamos nos resultados para a representação política ao longo do governo Bolsonaro (2019-2022), em que houve mudanças promovidas pelo Legislativo (restrição ao uso de autofinanciamento de candidatos) pelo Judiciário (proporcionalidade de recursos destinados às mulheres e candidaturas pretas e pardas); e pelo Executivo. Neste último caso, exploramos dados que vão além da regulamentação da Justiça Eleitoral brasileira e tocamos no ponto de pork-barrel (emendas parlamentares) via o chamado Orçamento Secreto. Os resultados mostram que, apesar de mudanças legais significativas, o financiamento eleitoral no Brasil continua altamente desigual. Do lado do governo Bolsonaro, a estratégia de entregar recursos à sua base política teve sucesso nas eleições legislativas

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore