208,480 research outputs found

    Territoires numériques de marques : transposition et/autorités (synthèse)

    No full text
    Territoire numériques de marques : transposition et/ou autorités. JE organisée le 16 avril 2015 à l’université de Poitiers et plus précisément, au laboratoire CEREGE de l’IAE de Poitiers. Camille (caddE-reputation) et moi-même avons essayé de synthétiser (voir vidéo) les communications en suivant l’objectif scientifique de la journée. C Alloing M Lebechec Synthèse JE Territoires numériques de marques Camille reprend le slide d’introduction et synthétise les questions et réponses soule..

    Eudendrium caraiuru Marques & Oliveira, 2003, sp. n.

    No full text
    Eudendrium caraiuru sp. n. Figures 1–19 Eudendrium glomeratum; Marques, 1993: 68 –75, pl. 3; 2001: 361–369, figs. 23–30; Migotto, 1996: 122; Rosso and Marques, 1997: 417; Oliveira et al., 2000: 519 –525; Migotto et al., 2001: 289, 294– 296; 2002: 11. non Eudendrium glomeratum Picard, 1951. Type material. Holotype: Brazil: São Sebastião: Baleeiro Point, female colony, 08.iii. 1988, formol, on rock, 3m, col. A.E. Migotto (MZUSP 0385; former ACM­SP029). Paratypes: Brazil: São Sebastião: Cigarras Beach: male colony, 15.vii. 1988, formol, intertidal, col. A.E. Migotto (MZUSP 0388; former ACM­SP034); Pitangueiras Beach (north rocky shore): male colony, 24.x. 1992, formol, on rock, intertidal, col. A.C. Marques (ROMIZ B 1223; former ACM­SP 162); Jarobá Point, Parque: male colony, 17.ix. 1990, formol, on test panel, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0394; former ACM­SP056); Baleeiro Point:; Baraqueçaba Beach: female colonies, 12.xii. 2001, formol, on metallic structures, 7m, col. H.K. Boscolo (MZUSP 0372); Lage dos Moleques: female colony, 05.xii. 1991, formol, on rock, 5m, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0423; former ACM­SP 114). Additional material. Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: Urca: colony without gonophores, ix. 1990, leg. I. Zalmon (MZUSP 0375; former ACM­RJ008); Ubatuba: Lázaro Beach: colony without gonophores, 28.vii. 1992, formol, on rock, intertidal, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0427; former ACM­SP 120); colony without gonophores, 28.vii. 1992, formol, on rock, intertidal, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0428; former ACM­SP 121); Maranduba Beach: colony without gonophores, 30.vii. 1992, formol, on rock, intertidal, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0429; former ACM­SP 123); São Sebastião: Pier Sul (Petrobrás): male colony, 18.vii. 1990, formol, on Perna perna, 1m, col. J.C. de Freitas (ACM­SP064); Pitangueiras Beach (north rocky shore): colony without gonophores, 18.viii. 1988, formol, 6m, col. A.E. Migotto (MZUSP 0458; former ACM­SP 159); male colony, 03.iv. 1992, formol, on Schizoporella, 3m, col. A.E. Migotto (MZUSP 0459; former ACM­SP 161); Jarobá Point (23 º 49,654´S 45 º 25,366´W): colony without gonophores 17.viii. 1990, formol, on test panel, 1m, col. A.C. Marques (MNRJ 2043; former ACM­SP044); colony without gonophores, 17.viii. 1990, formol, on test panel, 1m, col. A.C. Marques (ROMIZ B 1221; former ACM­SP045); colony without gonophores, 20.viii. 1990, formol, on test panel, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (MNRJ 2044; former ACM­SP048); colony without gonophores, 20.viii. 1990, formol, on test panel, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (MNRJ 2045; former ACM­ SP049); colony without gonophores, 20.viii. 1990, formol, on test panel, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (ROMIZ B 1222; former ACM­SP050); colony without gonophores, 15.ix. 1990, formol, on rope, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0392; former ACM­SP054); male colony, 15.ix. 1990, formol, on rope, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0393; former ACM­ SP055); colonies without gonophores, 22.i. 2000, formol, on test panel, 1m, col. O.M.P. Oliveira (MZUSP 0368); female colonies, 22.i. 2000, formol, on test panel, 1m, col. O.M.P. Oliveira (MZUSP 0369); colonies without gonophores, 25.i. 2002, alcohol, on ropes, 1m, col. O.M.P. Oliveira (MZUSP 0370); Barequeçaba Point (23 º 49,979´S 45 º 25,843´W): colonies without gomophores, 12.xii. 2001, formol, on metallic structures, 7m, col. H.K. Boscolo (MZUSP 0371); female colonies, 12.xii. 2001, formol, on metallic structures, 7m, col. H.K. Boscolo (MZUSP 0372); Cananéia: Cardoso Island, costão do Pereirinha: colony without gonophores, 26.viii. 1992, formol, on rock, intertidal, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0447; former ACM­SP 145). Diagnosis. Large euryteles with shaft:capsule proportion 3.0– 3.6; in pads on hydranth body, spadix of female gonophores, and in a whorl of 16–25 around hypostome. Female blastostyles with reduced hypostome and tentacles. Etymology. From the Tupi native language “ cáraiurú ” (= powerful mouth), in reference to the presence of large euryteles on the hypostome. Description. Colonies dioecious, arborescent, up to 54 mm in height, main stems unfascicled. Hydrocauli arising from creeping hydrorhiza; branches many, more or less alternate, occurring over entire hydrocaulus, branches up to third order, in radiate planes or rarely more or less planar; pedicels arising from main stem or branches of first, second or third order. Perisarc of main stem strongly developed, dark brown, single tubes 0.40 mm in diameter, with scarce annulations, in sets of 3–8 rings. Branches with 3–7 rings at origin, 0.20–0.25 mm in diameter. Pedicels sometimes completely annulated, yellowish, ca. 0.10 mm in diameter. Hydranths 0.18–0.75 mm in height, 0.18–0.57 mm in diameter (measured in the body region just below the tentacles), orange in color, with a distinct groove in the aboral region; tentacles 23–34 in number, occurring in a whorl below hypostome. Some hydranths with reduced tentacles juxtaposed in two close whorls. Gonophores styloids, arising from body of hydranth. Immature styloids placed in a circle around body of hydranth. Male blastostyle orange, with 10–29 sporosacs, each sporosac 1–2 chambered, linked to blastostyle body by a stalk, with a very distinct spadix over its longitudinal axis, and a terminal tubercle on its apex; distal chamber 0.12–0.18 mm in diameter. Male blastostyles completely reduced over earlier stages of their development with pedicels corrugated throughout. Female gonophores orange, arising on partially reduced blastostyles with highly atrophied hypostome and degenerated tentacles. Immature eggs having a simple and curved spadix over a single egg. Blastostyle reducing completely during development or at maximum with 1–5 stumps (tentacles), and spadices shed. Mature oval eggs thickened by perisarc and linked directly to the wrinkled pedicel by short and shallow concave peduncles. Eggs 4–7 in number, 0.24–0.39 mm in diameter. Nematocysts of two categories, heterotrichous microbasic euryteles and heterotrichous macrobasic (or mesobasic) euryteles. Small microbasic euryteles (seen discharged), 6.1 –8.0 X 2.9–3.9 m, L / W = 1: 2.05– 2.1, oval, abundant; distributed over hydranth body, hypostome, coenosarc, and tentacles. Large macrobasic euryteles (seen discharged), 18.7–22.7 X 7.1–9.3 m, L / W 1: 2.4– 2.6, bean shaped, common. Discharged shaft up to 60 m in length, 3. 0–3.6 times length of capsule; undischarged shaft in 1.5 coils inside capsule; distributed on hydranth body sometimes forming pads to a continuous ring, up to 25 capsules on hypostome, coenosarc, terminal tubercle, and immature female spadix sometimes forming pads. Distribution. Brazil: Rio de Janeiro State: Rio de Janeiro (Marques, 2001); São Paulo: Ubatuba (Marques, 2001), São Sebastião (Oliveira et al., 2000; Marques, 2001), Cananéia (Marques, 2001).Published as part of Marques, Antonio C. & Oliveira, Otto M. P., 2003, Eudendrium caraiuru sp. n. (Hydrozoa; Anthoathecata; Eudendriidae) from the southeastern coast of Brazil, pp. 1-12 in Zootaxa 307 on pages 3-6, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15661

    Eudendrium caraiuru Marques & Oliveira 2003

    No full text
    <i>Eudendrium caraiuru</i> Marques & Oliveira, 2003 <p> Synonyms in the area: <i>Eudendrium glomeratum</i> —Marques 1993; Rosso & Marques 1997; Oliveira <i>et al.</i> 2000; Marques 2001; Migotto <i>et al.</i> 2001; Silveira & Morandini 2011 [polyp] [non <i>Eudendrium glomeratum</i> Picard, 1951].</p> <p> Remarks: common species on the Brazilian coast (Marques <i>et al.</i> 2006). Further taxonomic details in Marques & Oliveira (2003).</p> <p> Distribution in South America: polyp—Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, from 3°S to 4.50°S, from 22.75°S to 25.58°S, from 38°S to 38.10°S (Marques 1993; Migotto 1996; Rosso & Marques 1997; Oliveira <i>et al.</i> 2000; Marques 2001; Migotto <i>et al.</i> 2001; Marques & Oliveira 2003; Oliveira & Marques 2005; Marques <i>et al.</i> 2006; Shimabukuro & Marques 2006a, abstract; Shimabukuro <i>et al.</i> 2006; Shimabukuro 2007; Silveira & Morandini 2011; Marques <i>et al</i>. 2013; Fernandez <i>et al</i>. 2014, 2015; Miranda <i>et al</i>. 2015).</p> <p> Habitat: polyp—in shallow waters, on fouling, ascidians, bryozoans, barnacles, gastropods, mussels, polychaete tubes, rocks, test panels and other artificial substrates (Migotto <i>et al.</i> 2001; Marques & Oliveira 2003; Marques <i>et al.</i> 2006; Shimabukuro & Marques 2006a; Shimabukuro 2007; Fernandez <i>et al</i>. 2014, 2015).</p>Published as part of <i>OLIVEIRA, OTTO M. P., MIRANDA, THAÍS P., ARAUJO, ENILMA M., AYÓN, PATRICIA, CEDEÑO-POSSO, CRISTINA M., CEPEDA-MERCADO, AMANCAY A., CÓRDOVA, PABLO, CUNHA, AMANDA F., GENZANO, GABRIEL N., HADDAD, MARIA ANGÉLICA, MIANZAN, HERMES W., MIGOTTO, ALVARO E., MIRANDA, LUCÍLIA S., MORANDINI, ANDRÉ C., NAGATA, RENATO M., NASCIMENTO, KARINE B., JÚNIOR, MIODELI NOGUEIRA, PALMA, SERGIO, QUIÑONES, JAVIER, RODRIGUEZ, CAROLINA S., SCARABINO, FABRIZIO, SCHIARITI, AGUSTÍN, STAMPAR, SÉRGIO N., TRONOLONE, VALQUÍRIA B. & MARQUES, ANTONIO C., 2016, Census of Cnidaria (Medusozoa) and Ctenophora from South American marine waters, pp. 1-256 in Zootaxa 4194 (1)</i> on page 58, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4194.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10068449">http://zenodo.org/record/10068449</a&gt

    Eudendrium pocaruquarum Marques 1995

    No full text
    Eudendrium pocaruquarum Marques, 1995 Remarks: species endemic to Brazil. Taxonomical remarks in Marques (1995). Distribution in South America: polyp—Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, from 3°S to 4°S, from 23.25°S to 24°S (Marques 1993, 1995, 2001; Rosso & Marques 1997; Oliveira 2003; Marques et al. 2006; Oliveira et al. 2006; Shimabukuro et al. 2006; Oliveira & Marques 2007, 2 0 11; Shimabukuro 2007; Silveira & Morandini 2011; Miranda et al. 2015). Habitat: polyp—at intertidal zone, on algae, bryozoans, Clavelina oblonga, mussels, polychaete tubes, and rock (Marques 1995; Oliveira 2003; Oliveira et al. 2006; Oliveira & Marques 2007, 2011; Shimabukuro 2007).Published as part of M. P. Oliveira 1,16, S P. Miranda 2, *,, Es W. Mianzan 10,, Ro E. Migotto 11,, Ne B. Nascimento 2,11, Eli Nogueira Júnior 12,, Er Quiñones 13,, Izio Scarabino 14,, Tín Schiariti 10,, Io N. Stampar 15,, Tronolone 2, , Quíria B. & Onio C. Marques 2,11, 2016, Census of Cnidaria (Medusozoa) and Ctenophora from South American marine waters, pp. 1-256 in Zootaxa 4194 (1) on pages 59-60, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4194.1.

    Ectopleura obypa Migotto & Marques 1999

    No full text
    Ectopleura obypa Migotto & Marques, 1999a Distribution in South America: polyp—Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, from 23.50°S to 24°S (Migotto & Marques 1999a; Migotto et al. 2002; Oliveira 2003; Oliveira et al. 2006; Shimabukuro & Marques 2006a, abstract; Oliveira & Marques 2007, 2011; Silveira & Morandini 2011; Miranda et al. 2015); medusa—Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, at 23.83°S 45.42°W (Migotto & Marques 1999a; Migotto et al. 2002; Silveira & Morandini 2011). Habitat: polyp—from 1 to 15m depth, on algae, ascidians, barnacles, mussels, light buoys (Migotto & Marques 1999a; Oliveira 2003; Oliveira et al. 2006; Shimabukuro & Marques 2006a; Oliveira & Marques 2007, 2011).Published as part of M. P. Oliveira 1,16, S P. Miranda 2, *,, Es W. Mianzan 10,, Ro E. Migotto 11,, Ne B. Nascimento 2,11, Eli Nogueira Júnior 12,, Er Quiñones 13,, Izio Scarabino 14,, Tín Schiariti 10,, Io N. Stampar 15,, Tronolone 2, , Quíria B. & Onio C. Marques 2,11, 2016, Census of Cnidaria (Medusozoa) and Ctenophora from South American marine waters, pp. 1-256 in Zootaxa 4194 (1) on pages 35-36, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4194.1.

    Psychotherapy, Counseling, and Coaching: different alternatives for Promoting Psychological Well-being.

    No full text
    This chapter analyzes three dominant approaches to mental health interventions: psychotherapy, counseling, and coaching. Their commonalities, as well as their main differences, are emphasized by using a continuum model encompassing time perspective; recipients of these interventions (ranging from patients with severe psychopathology, to distressed individuals, to normal populations); and types of therapeutic strategies that are applied. Psychotherapy, counseling, and coaching are differentiated in some ways because the first mainly refers to a medical model, whereas counseling and coaching rely on communication strategies. However, in current practice the distinctions are not as clear. Furthermore, they all share common ingredients, such as the working alliance, positive expectations, and the promotion of well-being

    SMT-based bounded model checking for embedded ANSI-C software

    No full text
    Propositional bounded model checking has been applied successfully to verify embedded software but remains limited by increasing propositional formula sizes and the loss of high-level information during the translation preventing potential optimizations to reduce the state space to be explored. These limitations can be overcome by encoding high-level information in theories richer than propositional logic and using SMT solvers for the generated verification conditions. Here, we propose the application of different background theories and SMT solvers to the verification of embedded software written in ANSI-C in order to improve scalability and precision in a completely automatic way. We have modified and extended the encodings from previous SMT-based bounded model checkers to provide more accurate support for variables of finite bit width, bit-vector operations, arrays, structures, unions and pointers. We have integrated the CVC3, Boolector, and Z3 solvers with the CBMC front-end and evaluated them using both standard software model checking benchmarks and typical embedded software applications from telecommunications, control systems, and medical devices. The experiments show that our ESBMC model checker can analyze larger problems than existing tools and substantially reduce the verification time

    In Search of Minimal Hypersurfaces

    No full text
    We study minimal hypersurfaces from the point of view of min-max theory. We present a proof of Yau's conjecture for the abundance of minimal surfaces, which builds on previous works by F. C. Marques and A. Neves, and extend it to some non-compact ambient manifolds. We show a generic equidistribution result for minimal hypersurfaces (joint with F. C. Marques and A. Neves). Then we give a proof of a conjecture by H. J. Rubinstein on realizing strongly irreducible Heegaard splittings of 33-manifolds by minimal surfaces (joint with D. Ketover and Y. Liokumovich). Other results related to minimal surfaces are explained

    Transport of cowpea bean derived peptides and their modulator effects on mRNA expression of cholesterol-related genes in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells

    No full text
    The author MR Marques is grateful to FAPESP (Foundation for research support of the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil) PhD scholarship 2013/09304-2 and research grant 2012/15900-4. The authors and sponsor declare no conflict of interest. We wish to thank Amanda Caroline C. C. Carlos for collaboration on hydrolysis.El autor, Sr. Marques, agradece la beca de doctorado 2013/09304-2 y la beca de investigación 2012/15900-4 de la FAPESP (Fundación de Apoyo a la Investigación del Estado de São Paulo, Brasil). Los autores y el patrocinador declaran no tener ningún conflicto de intereses. Agradecemos a Amanda Caroline C. C. Carlos por su colaboración en el área de hidrólisis

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore