1,721,094 research outputs found
Brief von Kurt Rothschild an Mark Setterfield
No full textBRIEF VON KURT ROTHSCHILD AN MARK SETTERFIELD
Brief von Kurt Rothschild an Mark Setterfield ([1]
Brief von Mark Setterfield an Kurt Rothschild
No full textBRIEF VON MARK SETTERFIELD AN KURT ROTHSCHILD
Brief von Mark Setterfield an Kurt Rothschild ([1]
Brief von Kurt Rothschild an Mark Setterfield
No full textBRIEF VON KURT ROTHSCHILD AN MARK SETTERFIELD
Brief von Kurt Rothschild an Mark Setterfield ([1]
Brief von Kurt Rothschild an Mark Setterfield
No full textBRIEF VON KURT ROTHSCHILD AN MARK SETTERFIELD
Brief von Kurt Rothschild an Mark Setterfield ([1]
Brief von Mark Setterfield an Kurt Rothschild
No full textBRIEF VON MARK SETTERFIELD AN KURT ROTHSCHILD
Brief von Mark Setterfield an Kurt Rothschild ([1]
Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy – A review of the book edited by Giuseppe Fontana and Mark Setterfield
No full textFirst paragraph: As Claudio Sardoni in this issue points out, Giuseppe Fontana and Mark Setterfield (2009) have edited a very interesting volume. Given the vast amounts of macroeconomic literature published since Hick's invention of the IS-LM model and the still existing predominance of this model in many undergraduate textbooks, it is clearly time for new approaches to teaching macroeconomics
The central banker as "regulator" of conflict. A 'reversed' reading of the Solow and New Consensus models
No full textWe show that the equilibrium of the Solow growth model represents the pivotal point of reference for the so-called "New Consensus" model. Taking the mathematical structure of the "Solow-New Consensus" analysis as our starting point, we shall show how switching the positions of the exogenous and endogenous variables leads to very different analytical results, with particular reference to the interpretations of monetary theory and policy
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
