1,721,151 research outputs found
Correction to: Mark Coeckelbergh, AI Ethics, Mit Press, 2021: Ethics of AI: The Philosophical Challenges (Science and Engineering Ethics, (2021), 27, 4, (50), 10.1007/s11948-021-00323-8)
No full textIn this article the title and running title were incorrectly given as ‘Marc Coeckelbergh, AI Ethics, Mit Press, 2021’ but should have been ’Mark Coeckelbergh, AI Ethics, Mit Press, 2021’. The original article has been corrected.Ethics & Philosophy of Technolog
Vulnerabilidad humana respecto la Inteligencia Artificial en el pensamiento de Mark Coeckelbergh
Get PDFAnalyzing the scope of Artificial Intelligence from the perspective and thought of Mark Coeckelbergh, it is possible to appreciate the existing relationship between humans and AI as a point of interest and questioning for multiple fields of knowledge, in such sense the present analysis emphasizes this relationship of the acceleration of technology and the vulnerabilities that it represents. A documentary analysis was carried out, with a critical approach, whose scope lies in the contrast related to the phenomenon under study, having as main sources the works of Mark Coeckelbergh and other sources linked to the proposal of this author, some of them journalistic. The dependence on technology implies a certain vulnerability that is increasingly evident, as a result of the acceleration of the technological race and the incorporation of AI in labor, educational and even daily activities. The author reveals critical elements that are of great interest and relevance for the various fields of knowledge, within these critical elements the most controversial is the chain of vulnerabilities that intertwine the human and the machine, aspect to it there are common views with other authors whose contribution is also relevant today.En el análisis sobre los alcances de la Inteligencia Artificial desde la perspectiva y pensamiento de Mark Coeckelbergh, se puede apreciar la relación existente entre los humanos y la IA como un punto de interés y cuestionamiento de múltiples campos de conocimiento. En tal sentido, el presente análisis hace especial énfasis en dicha relación como producto del aceleramiento de la tecnología y las vulnerabilidades que representan. Se realizó un análisis documental, con un enfoque crítico, cuyo alcance radica en el contraste relativo al fenómeno de estudio, teniendo como fuentes principales las obras de Mark Coeckelbergh y otras fuentes ligadas a la propuesta de este autor, algunas de ellas de tipo periodístico. La dependencia hacia la tecnología es cada vez más evidente, debido a su acelerada implementación en las actividades laborales, educativas e, incluso, cotidianas. El autor revela diversos elementos críticos sobre algunas ramas del conocimiento, entre los que se destaca, por su carácter controversial, la vulnerabilidad en las relaciones entre el ser humano y la máquina
Mark Coeckelbergh Wants “Democratic AI” to Build a Common World
Get PDFIn Why AI Undermines Democracy and What to Do About It, Mark Coeckelbergh challenges the prevailing notion of AI as politically neutral, asserting that it amplifies threats to democracy. He explores how AI furthers technocracy, authoritarianism, and centralized power in the hands of corporate elites. Moreover, he shows that as AI-driven algorithms increase polarization and misinformation, they ruin the civic culture essential to democracy, including a public sphere of trust, tolerance, and rational deliberation that produces consensus. However, Coeckelbergh envisions a future where AI enhances democracy rather than eroding it. He advocates for "democratic AI" — technologies designed to support public discourse, serve the common good, and foster a common world. Through this principle underlying tech design, in addition to civic education and stronger oversight of Big Tech, he outlines a pathway toward reclaiming AI for democracy. While there are unresolved tensions, such as between liberty and the common good, Coeckelbergh offers a compelling philosophical framework to inspire actionable reforms
«Pensar a pandemia, a Vida e o Cuidado: Mediação Digital», com Bernardo Ferro e Mark Coeckelbergh
No full textSob a chancela da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Coimbra e da Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, o Instituto de Estudos Filosóficos promoveu esta sessão dedicada à "Mediação Digital", no âmbito do segundo ciclo de encontros "Pensar a pandemia, a Vida e o Cuidado", coordenado por Joaquim Braga, João Maria André e Bernardo Ferro.
O Instituto de Estudos Filosóficos é financiado por fundos nacionais através da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., no âmbito do projeto UID/FIL/00010/2020.
Atente às redes sociais, à página Web do Instituto de Estudos Filosóficos e à página do evento para mais informações:
https://www.uc.pt/fluc/uidief
https://www.facebook.com/institutodeestudosfilosoficos
http://10229251.356963.renderforestsites.com/
A música utilizada nestes vídeos pode ser encontrada in:
http://www.mp3classicalmusic.net/Works/shostakovich-pianoconcerto2.ht
Self-Absorption in the Digital Era: A Review of "Self-Improvement Technologies of the Soul in the Age of Artificial Intelligence" by Mark Coeckelbergh
Get PDFMark Coeckelbergh is a Belgian philosopher who specializes in the philosophy of technology. His work primarily explores the intersection of technology and society, specifically the philosophical implications of emerging technologies such as AI and robotics. He has written on whether machines can be moral agents and how ethical frameworks should be applied to autonomous machines. He has a broad philosophical perspective drawing on classical sources, Eastern philosophy, Marxism, Foucault, phenomenology, and the postmodernists. In this short text, he brings his remarkable insights and erudition to bear on our attempts at self-improvement in the age of AI
Self-Absorption in the Digital Era: A Review of "Self-Improvement Technologies of the Soul in the Age of Artificial Intelligence" by Mark Coeckelbergh
No full textMark Coeckelbergh is a Belgian philosopher who specializes in the philosophy of technology. His work primarily explores the intersection of technology and society, specifically the philosophical implications of emerging technologies such as AI and robotics. He has written on whether machines can be moral agents and how ethical frameworks should be applied to autonomous machines. He has a broad philosophical perspective drawing on classical sources, Eastern philosophy, Marxism, Foucault, phenomenology, and the postmodernists. In this short text, he brings his remarkable insights and erudition to bear on our attempts at self-improvement in the age of AI
Responsibility, Technology and Innovation: The Recognition of a Capable Agent
Get PDFPar II concludes with Chapter 10, in which Guido Gorgoni and Robert Gianni resort to Ricoeur’s notion of responsibility to frame a new approach to responsibility in technological innovation. According to the authors, Ricoeur’s contribution is important because he reconnects responsibility to the semantics of moral imputation, therefore regaining the sense of the connection between the agent and the action more than that of the attribution of its (typically negative) consequences. Responsibility in technological innovation is not just about a correct procedures and robust and trustworthy technological devices; it is also about personal commitment, towards oneself and the others
AI, Democracy, and the Common Good
No full textSpeaker: Mark Coeckelbergh, Commentators: Zeynep Pamuk and Isabelle Ferrera
Ética na inteligência artificial
Get PDFDescriptive review of the text Ethics in artificial intelligence, by Mark Coeckelbergh.Revisión descriptiva del texto Ética en inteligencia artificial, de Mark Coeckelbergh
- …
