1,720,965 research outputs found
Reseña de Mario Gensollen, Argumentación y desacuerdo
No full text"Argumentación y desacuerdo", es un libro que tiene por objetivo advertir de los riesgos que asumimos por entender a la argumentación desde el desacuerdo. El Dr. Mario Gensollen afirma que hemos exagerado en el vínculo que existe entre la argumentación y el desacuerdo. Cuando los teóricos de la argumentación abusan en sistematizar sus hallazgos desde esa relación, se corre el riesgo de no lograr los propósitos que se suelen tener en la práctica argumentativa, principalmente porque al no entender la relación entre desacuerdo y argumentación, toda discusión se vuelve una guerra donde se busca que el otro pierda. Así, los bienes epistémicos de la argumentación son ignorados, reduciendo la calidad de nuestros argumentos y nuestras discusiones. 
¿Es moralmente reprobable sostener o adoptar creencias religiosas?
Get PDFThere is something morally reproachable in sustain or adopt religious beliefs? By the hand of Agustin, Aristotle, William James, Ortega y Gasset, Wittgenstein and Austin, the author tries to show in this article the difficulties to articulate coherently the reason of why we can adopt or sustain religious beliefs without morally reproaches. Moreover, he shows the insufficiencies of the pragmatic defense of Agustin in De utilitate credendi opting for a reconsideration of the wittgensteinian texts to clarify the problem
Wittgenstein y la gramática de lo interno /
No full text\ua0tesis que para obtener el grado de Doctorado en Filosofía, presenta Mario Gensollen Mendoza ; tutor principal de tesis Carlos Pereda Failache165 páginas :\ua0ilustracionesDoctorado en Filosofía\ua0Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,\ua02012\ua0Programa de Posgrado en Filosofí
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Virtudes y vicios argumentativos: A veinte años de Vértigos argumentales, de Carlos Pereda
Get PDFThe aim of this paper is to analyze the importance and relevance of the Carlos Pereda’s thought in argumentation theory, focusing on his work entitled Vértigos Argumentales, which has as its central purpose the defense of an emphatic reason, not deprived of uncertainty, but neither of objectivity. Keeping in mind that Carlos Pereda’s theory of argumentation is close to his conception of rationality, the author turns to the analysis of issues that intersect, such as epistemic virtues, the concept of rationality, an ethics of argumentation, etc. The paper concludes with the view of argumentation through the concept of ‘practice’, where different aspects to be considered in argumentative action are pointed out. It concludes that Vértigos Argumentales formulated and developed some basic intuitions that are present in the contemporary debate about argumentation and virtue
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
