1,720,962 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Divergences in chronic cough management among healthcare professionals in Southern Italy: A comprehensive survey
No full textINTRODUCTION Chronic cough (CC) presents a widespread and intricate challenge for diagnosis and treatment, revealing a significant lack of information on medical strategies. This study aims to gather insights from different practitioners in Southern Italy regarding their views and methodologies towards CC. METHODS The investigation engaged 102 medical practitioners from Southern Italy, encompassing 23 general practitioners, 30 pulmonologists, 25 allergologists, and 24 otolaryngologists. It examined their understanding, attitudes, and approaches towards managing CC, with an emphasis on diagnostic processes, treatment preferences, and adherence to guidelines. RESULTS The findings highlight distinct variations in the management of chronic cough among different medical specialists. Notably, otolaryngologists and pulmonologists tend to categorize chronic cough as lasting for more extended periods than allergists and general practitioners. Pulmonologists, in particular, are more prone to suggest chest X-rays for chronic cough patients, reflecting their focus on lung-related conditions. In terms of the primary causes of CC, allergists and pulmonologists often attribute it to asthma, general practitioners to gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and otolaryngologists to upper airways cough syndrome. Pulmonologists are also observed to have the most comprehensive awareness of the various conditions associated with coughing, which is likely due to their specialization in respiratory health. CONCLUSIONS The research underscores the necessity for enhanced education and standardized procedures among healthcare providers in Southern Italy for managing CC, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation and customized treatment plans to improve the outcomes for patients with CC and guide future therapeutic strategies
Why Every Asthma Patient Tells a Different Story
No full textAsthma has traditionally been viewed as a single disease, but recent research reveals its clinical and molecular complexity. This perspective highlights the need to shift from a traditional, uniform treatment paradigm to one that embraces the heterogeneity of asthma across individuals. Each patient presents a unique clinical story shaped by a complex interplay of genetic predispositions, developmental programming during critical early-life windows, the influence of sex and hormones, and lifelong environmental exposures. Asthma comprises multiple subtypes with distinct clinical and biological features. Furthermore, lifestyle factors such as obesity and smoking, along with highly prevalent comorbidities like allergic rhinitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease, significantly modify the disease’s course and response to treatment. This article explores how classifying the disease into clinical phenotypes (observable characteristics) and molecular endotypes (underlying mechanisms)—particularly the distinction between T2-high and T2-low inflammation—provides a crucial framework for managing this complexity. The application of this framework, guided by biomarkers, has enabled the development of targeted biologic therapies that can transform care for specific patient subgroups. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain. The pathophysiology of certain subgroups, particularly non-T2 asthma, remains poorly defined, and there is an urgent need for reliable predictive biomarkers to guide therapy and monitor outcomes. It is our opinion that future studies must adopt a systems-biology strategy, with a multi-omics approach that constructs a comprehensive molecular profile of each patient. This integrative methodology will require the use of advanced computational methods, including machine learning and artificial intelligence, to decipher the complex pathways linking genetic and environmental inputs to clinical disease. In conclusion, this article argues for a more personalized understanding of asthma, urging clinicians and researchers to consider each patient’s unique clinical presentation
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
