1,720,965 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
A voxel-based assessment of noise properties in computed tomography imaging with the asir-v and asir iterative reconstruction algorithms
Full text linkGiven the inherent characteristics of nonlinearity and nonstationarity of iterative reconstruction algorithms in computed tomography (CT) imaging, this study aimed to perform, for the first time, a voxel-based characterization of noise properties in CT imaging with the ASiR-V and ASiR algorithms as compared with conventional filtered back projection (FBP). Multiple repeated scans of the Catphan-504 phantom were carried out. CT images were reconstructed using FBP and ASiR/ASiR-V with different blending levels of reconstruction (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%). Noise maps and their nonuniformity index (NUI) were obtained according to the approach proposed by the report of AAPM TG-233. For the homogeneous CTP486 module, ASiR-V/ASiR allowed a noise reduction of up to 63.7%/52.9% relative to FBP. While the noise reduction values of ASiR-V-/ASiR-reconstructed images ranged up to 33.8%/39.9% and 31.2%/35.5% for air and Teflon contrast objects, respectively, these values were approximately 60%/50% for other contrast objects (PMP, LDPE, polystyrene, acrylic, Delrin). Moreover, for all contrast objects but air and Teflon, ASiR-V showed a greater noise reduction potential than ASiR when the blending level was ≥40%. While noise maps of the homogenous CTP486 module showed only a slight spatial variation of noise (NUI < 5.2%) for all reconstruction algorithms, the NUI values of iterative-reconstructed images of the nonhomogeneous CTP404 module increased nonlinearly with blending level and were 19%/15% and 6.7% for pure ASiR-V/ASiR and FBP, respectively. Overall, these results confirm the potential of ASiR-V and ASiR in reducing noise as compared with conventional FBP, suggesting, however, that the use of pure ASiR-V or ASiR might be suboptimal for specific clinical applications
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
MRIndex: A tool for evaluating muscle involvement in neuromuscular diseases from MRI images
No full textThe progress and severity of neuromuscular conditions can be monitored in several ways, most of which are invasive and, thus, poorly acceptable, for the patient. Among the least obtrusive solutions, the use of muscular magnetic resonance imaging is gaining importance in last decades, therefore becoming the elective methodology for defining the muscular involvement in such conditions. However, subjectivity is always quite frequent in the interpretation of biomedical images, and the diagnosis is often demanded to the experience of the clinician's eye. With MRIndex, a novel tool for the automated analysis of muscular magnetic resonance images, a quantitative 'picture' of the muscular involvement in neuromuscular conditions is defined, stemming from the definition of fat infiltration within the muscular tissue, well-known biomarker for disease severity. The solution is currently used at clinics and preliminary at-a-glance results are quite promising. If such evidence is confirmed on larger cohorts and with a more robust statistical approach, the tool can represent a groundbreaking alternative in current clinical practice, possibly bringing to a more objective definition of the clinical status of a patient and helping in the personalization of the treatment, possibly improving their outcome
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
