1,720,962 research outputs found
Prediction of Dynamic Viscosity of Organic Compounds in the Liquid Phase.
No full textEuotherm Seminar n.2:Prediction Methods fo Transport Properties of Pure Substances and Their Mixtures.
Stuttgart (Germany
Predizione della Viscosità Dinamica delle Sostanze allo Stato Liquido tra il Punto di Fusione e la Temperatura Critica.
No full textAtti del 5° Congresso Nazionale sul Trasporto del Calor
Dynamic Viscosity of Refrigerants and Refrigerant Mixtures: A Prediction Method.
No full textCollection: Refrigeration Science and Technolog
Proprietà di Trsporto in Fase Liquida dei Refrigeranti Alternativi ai CFC.
No full textAtti del XII Congresso Nazionale dell'Unione Italiana di Termofluidodinamica (UIT) dal titolo "Heat Transfer Conference"
Liquid dynamic viscosity: a general prediction method with an application to refrigerants and refrigerant mixtures
No full text
Refrigerant fluids in the saturated liquid state: a general correlation between dynamic viscosity and reduced temperature
No full textThermal conductivity of liquids in the reduced temperature range 0.3 to 0.8 from saturation line to 350 MPa
No full textThermal conductivity of liquids is investigated in the reduced temperature range 0.3 to 0.8 from saturation line to 350 MP
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
