1,720,957 research outputs found
First-year experience with MICA technique: learning difficulties, mistakes, and results
BACKGROUND: Hallux valgus is a very common forefoot disorder, first named by Carl Hueter (1871) as a condition with a static subluxation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint with lateral deviation of the great toe and medial deviation of the first metatarsal. It usually leads to pain and functional impairment of the foot. With the continuous evolution of technology and the idea to shift open Austin Akin osteotomy to MIS surgery, more recently Redfern and Vernois developed the Minimally Invasive Chevron Akin (MICA) technique. The use of this technique has been vastly studied by the authors, but to our knowledge there is a scarce literature production by independent authors reporting their experience in the use of this technique. The aim of the present study was to show our preliminary results in the use of MICA technique performed by the same surgeon during his first year of use, underlining the learning difficulties, mistakes and results achieved during this frame of time. METHODS: The MICA procedure was performed on 60 feet from July 2018 to July 2019. A follow-up of at least 11 months was achieved. The clinical outcome was measured through AOFAS Score. RESULTS: The mean patients age was 51.5 years old (range: from 36 to 72 years old). The mean AOFAS Score was 90.4, interestingly 24 patients (40% of the total of 60 patients) had AOFAS Score set over 90. CONCLUSIONS: MICA osteotomy marries percutaneous surgery with the Austin Akin osteotomy, that have been and are widely used for the treatment of hallux valgus. It is possible to achieve the good results of a well know surgery with a stable fixation and obtain all the goals of percutaneous surgery, such has limited pain, good postoperative range of motion and an overall positive experience of the patient. The learning curve, if the surgeon is correctly instructed, is steep, but the results are good since the first procedures. On the other hand, the complications/surgical errors reported are limited, easily resolvable and do not impact the overall positive results. (Cite this article as: Marcolli D, Pichierri I, Minoli C, Mazzotti A, Compagnoni R, Randelli PS. First-year experience with MICA technique: learning difficulties, mistakes, and results. Minerva Orthop 2024;75:7-13. DOI: 10.23736/S2784-8469.23.04330-4
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Indications, Associated Procedures, and Results of Ankle Plafond-Plasty for Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Backgrounds: Plafond-plasty is a joint-preserving procedure to treat varus ankle osteoarthritis (OA) with asymmetrical joint involvement. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate indications, different surgical techniques, associated procedures, and results of plafond-plasty in varus ankle OA and to analyze the level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QOE) of the included studies. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. Results: Five studies evaluating 99 ankles were included. A non-rigid varus ankle deformity and an ankle OA Takakura stage 3b or less were the most recommended pre-operative indications. Meta-analysis showed a significant post-operative improvement in clinical and radiological parameters. Many associated surgical procedures have been reported, the most frequent being medial additional supramalleolar osteotomy and lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. The level of evidence and methodological quality assessment of the included studies showed an overall low quality. Conclusion: Plafond-plasty seems to be a promising surgical option when managing varus ankle OA with asymmetrical joint involvement, extending the indications for joint sparing surgery. Additional associated procedures should be carefully evaluated case-by-case. Levels of Evidence: IV
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Hindfoot Valgus and First Ray Insufficiency: Is There Correlation?
The first metatarsal has the greatest inclination of all metatarsals and carries about 40% of body weight during the static stance. The rearfoot and the first ray (FR) are two distinct structures, but they are strongly related to the latest studies in the literature; however, their mutual involvement in the foot biomechanics appears not to be fully explored. Understanding their interdependence is essential to approaching the patient in his totality. This overview aims to analyze the current evidence from the latest studies that examine the correlation between FR insufficiency (FRI) and hindfoot valgus (HV), focusing on their biomechanical interaction, clinical implications, and treatment approaches. All analyzed studies showed that plantarflexion of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint in correct alignment increased by 26% compared to a deviated articulation. In FRI, the "windlass" mechanism appears compromised, and FR lacks the necessary stability and plantarflexion; consequently, the medial arch collapses, and the foot moves into excessive pronation. On the other hand, in HV condition, the pulley system is significantly diminished, and peroneus longus contraction cannot stabilize the FR with resultant FRI and dorsal migration. A significant correlation was found between hindfoot alignment and first metatarsal rotation (86% of patients) and between HV and hallux valgus. Foot orthoses, physical therapy, and exercise programs, especially in the initial stages of symptomatic HV, provide satisfactory results in 67% to 90% of cases, improving foot alignment and pain relief in FRI patients. In more severe cases, surgical intervention to realign the hindfoot is indicated with a very low complication rate (1-4%), which can vary from 24% to 55% in stage 4 flatfoot. No study in the literature has been found to address both pathologies simultaneously from a treatment point of view, and, although not all HV patients are affected by FRI, most patients seem to benefit from surgical stabilization of the FR in 80% of individuals with symptomatic HV. However, despite a predominance of FRI among HV individuals, not all clinical studies have confirmed this correlation
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
