1,720,956 research outputs found
Serum ostase in the follow-up of breast cancer patients
The present study was carried out on 152 patients divided into three groups: A) 73 underwent radical surgery for breast carcinoma without signs of metastases; B) 31 patients with radiologic and scintigraphic evidence of bone metastases originating from malignant mammary neoplasia (14 with only one and 17 with two or more localizations); C) 48 affected by simple mammary cysts. No patients had a previous history of primary or secondary bone pathologies or renal, hepatic or endocrine ones. Besides this, no patient took drugs influencing the metabolic turnover of the bony tissue in the three months preceding the study. After surgery all patients underwent standard clinical and laboratory follow-up, the latter including, every 3 months, the evaluation of serum CA 15.3, CA 27.29 MCA, and ostase. The ostase cut-off, obtained by the statistical elaboration of the serum values of the 48 patients with benign mammary cysts and the 73 disease free patients, was 17 microg./L. The mean concentration in the three groups and two subgroups was: 13.76 microg./L (patients without metastases), 31.84 (patients with metastases), 18.4 (limited bony metastases), 40.04 (diffused bony metastases) and 5,36 (mammary cists). The diagnostic sensitivity of ostase proved superior to that of CA 15.3 (84% vs 75%) except when considering the subgroup with limited metastases (71.4% vs 72.7%), while the specificity was similar (around 78%). CA 27.29 and MCA were not useful as markers of metastasis. In a longitudinal-perspective study it was possible periodically to test these markers in 13 patients, at fist, disease free and then with signs of bone progression evidence by skeletal scintigraphy. In 11 of these patients ostase and CA 15.3 showed increased values, on average 136 and 131 days respectively, before instrumental evidence of progression. None of the 13 patients, at the time of bone progression diagnosis, showed clinical, laboratory or instrumental signs of disease in other organs. The precocity of the serum increase of ostase could have a triple role: 1) accomplishment of a closer follow-up in patients at ''high risk'' of bone disease; 2) aid in the interpretation ''in a neoplastic sense'' of an ''uncertain image of hypercaptation''; 3) accomplishment of a supporting or specific oncology treatment at an earlier stage which may be of some advantage as regards quality of life
Skeletal alkaline phosphatase as a serum marker of bone metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast cancer
Immunoradiometric determination of the bone isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase with a method provided by Hybritech Inc., San Diego CA (USA) was carried out in 145 female patients, 97 of whom with radically operated breast cancer and 48 with benign mammary cysts, in order to evaluate the correlation of serum levels with the metabolic process of bone rearrangement in patients with bone metastases. This study shows that skeletal ALP, having high specificity (86.48%) and sensitivity (78.6%) for early progression (the average anticipation time compared to scintigraphic detection was 101 days) could represent a valid marker for bone metastases in association with mucinous markers in the follow-up of patients operated for breast cancer. In addition, dynamic serum determination of skeletal ALP could be a valid help in monitoring the efficacy of therapy in patients with bone progression
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
