1,721,024 research outputs found
Special issue of the 24th RCRA InternationalWorkshop on Experimental Evaluation of Algorithms for Solving Problems with Combinatorial Explosion
Symbolic Numeric Planning with Patterns
In this paper, we propose a novel approach for solving linear numeric planning problems, called Symbolic Pattern Planning. Given a planning problem Π, a bound n and a pattern –defined as an arbitrary sequence of actions– we encode the problem of finding a plan for Π with bound n as a formula with fewer variables and/or clauses than the state-of-the-art rolled-up and relaxed-relaxed-∃ encodings. More importantly, we prove that for any given bound, it is never the case that the latter two encodings allow finding a valid plan while ours does not. On the experimental side, we consider 6 other planning systems –including the ones which participated in this year’s International Planning Competition (IPC)– and we show that our planner PATTY has remarkably good comparative performances on this year’s IPC problems
Translation-based approaches for solving disjunctive temporal problems with preferences
Disjunctive Temporal Problems (DTPs) with Preferences (DTPPs) extend DTPs with piece-wise constant preference functions associated to each constraint of the form l ≤ x − y ≤ u, where x, y are (real or integer) variables, and l, u are numeric constants. The goal is to find an assignment to the variables of the problem that maximizes the sum of the preference values of satisfied DTP constraints, where such values are obtained by aggregating the preference functions of the satisfied constraints in it under a “max” semantic. The state-of-the-art approach in the field, implemented in the native DTPP solver Maxilitis, extends the approach of the native DTP solver Epilitis. In this paper we present alternative approaches that translate DTPPs
to Maximum Satisfiability of a set of Boolean combination of constraints of the form l ./ x − y ./ u, ./∈ {<, ≤}, that extend previous work dealing with constant preference functions only. We prove correctness and completeness of the approaches. Results obtained with the Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers Yices and MathSAT on randomly generated DTPPs and DTPPs built from real-world benchmarks, show that one of our translation is competitive to, and can be faster than, Maxilitis
Translation-based approaches for solving disjunctive temporal problems with preferences
Disjunctive Temporal Problems (DTPs) with Preferences (DTPPs) extend DTPs with piece-wise constant preference functions associated to each constraint of the form l ≤ x − y ≤ u, where x,y are (real or integer) variables, and l,u are numeric constants. The goal is to find an assignment to the variables of the problem that maximizes the sum of the preference values of satisfied DTP constraints, where such values are obtained by aggregating the preference functions of the satisfied constraints in it under a “max” semantic. The state-of-the-art approach in the field, implemented in the native DTPP solver Maxilitis, extends the approach of the native DTP solver Epilitis. In this paper we present alternative approaches that translate DTPPs to Maximum Satisfiability of a set of Boolean combination of constraints of the form l⋈x − y⋈u, ⋈ ∈<,≤, that extend previous work dealing with constant preference functions only. We prove correctness and completeness of the approaches. Results obtained with the Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers Yices and MathSAT on randomly generated DTPPs and DTPPs built from real-world benchmarks, show that one of our translation is competitive to, and can be faster than, Maxilitis (This is an extended and revised version of Bourguet et al. 2013). © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
- …
