1,721,021 research outputs found

    Tubal reanastomosis or IVF?

    No full text
    n/

    Endometriosis externa and interna: Endoscopic diagnosis

    No full text
    Endometriosis is defined as the presence of the endometrium outside the endometrial cavity. If the ectopic mucosa is located within the endometrium, the disease is defined as endometriosis interna, or adenomyosis, whereas the localization of the endometrium outside the uterus is defined as endometriosis externa, or pelvic endometriosis. The diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis requires invasive techniques, such as laparoscopy or laparotomy, with histologic confirmation on the surgical specimen. The diagnosis of adenomyosis should be based on histology of hysterectomy specimen, since the endoscopic diagnosis is still too inaccurate. Laparoscopy allows the visualization of the different aspects of pelvic endometriosis, i.e. superficial implants, deep lesions, and associated adhesions. Staging is based on a score attributed to each location in order to establish a prognosis in terms of the patient's reproductive performance

    Operative laparoscopy.

    No full text
    Operative laparoscopy has replaced the conventional approach by laparotomy to the treatment of most benign gynecological diseases (benign adnexal cysts, ectopic pregnancy, tubal infertility, polycystic ovarian disease, endometriosis, myomas), with advantages in terms of shorter hospital stay, less discomfort and complications for the patient, minor social costs due to the early resumption of normal working activities, and comparable results in terms of reproductive outcome

    Salpingoscopy

    No full text

    Tubal factor infertility

    No full text
    Various studies demonstrated that there is no close correlation between the intratubal damage and the extent and type of pelvic adhesions. Moreover, the results of prospective studies on the prognostic value of salpingoscopy showed that the tubal mucosal status is the most important prognostic factor in terms of reproductive outcome. Salpingoscopy has modified the management of patients with tubal infertility, since the accurate evaluation of the tubal mucosa permits the selection of patients with a normal mucosa (34-42% of the patients with hydrosalpinx and 76-80% of those with periadnexal adhesions) who can benefit from tubal reconstructive surgery. In these patients the term pregnancy rate is 60% in case of hydrosalpinx and 70% in case of periadnexal adhesions

    Laparoscopic treatment of adnexal cystic masses

    No full text
    Operative laparoscopy has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of numerous gynecological benign conditions. In the case of ovarian cysts, however, the use of the laparoscopic approach has been debated due to the possibility of encountering an unexpected ovarian malignancy at the time of surgery. This would upstage a IA or IB ovarian malignancy to IC. In this review, the authors evaluate the preoperative parameters that could help in the selection of the patients who are candidate to a laparoscopic approach. In particular, the authors consider the age related risk of the patients, the use of sonography and color-Doppler velocimetry, the use of CA 125, and as a last diagnostic step, the findings at laparoscopy. In a personal series of 1 584 cysts hi patients under 40 years of age, the first author encountered 7 unexpected borderline tumors and 1 mucinous G1 adenocarcinoma, while no malignancy was found in a group of strictly selected postmenopausal patients. These data have been compared with those found in scientific literature. There is no sound evidence that the stripping procedure determines a reduction of the ovarian reserve when performed with strict microsurgical principles. Recent evidence in the literature suggests that the decreased ovarian responsiveness reported by some authors following ovarian cystectomy may not be a consequence of surgery. The concern of a possible reduction of the ovarian reserve needs to be balanced with the benefits obtained with surgery. Finally, it should always be kept in mind the risk of an unexpected malignancy, even in cysts apparently benign, malignancy that can only be diagnosed through surgery obtaining a specimen for pathology

    Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures in ovarian microsurgery: Experimental results in the rabbit model

    No full text
    Microsurgery has been shown to reduce the risk of adhesion formation when compared to conventional surgery in cases of benign ovarian pathology. However, the microsurgeons have contrasting opinions concerning the use of absorbable versus non-casebable suture materials. In the present study we compared nylon versus vicryl sutures for ovarian surgery using the rabbit as an experimental model. No differences were found in terms not only of post-operative adhesions but also in terms of post-operative reproductive outcome for the sutures analyzed

    Reproductive performance in women with bicornuate uterus.

    No full text
    The medical records of 21 patients with bicornuate uterus were analyzed. Thirteen patients did not undergo corrective surgery, whereas eight underwent metroplasty. The pregnancies in patients who did not undergo surgery, and the outcome evaluated. The outcome of pregnancies after corrective surgery was also analyzed. The cumulative pregnancy rates at 12 and 24 months were 67% and 95% in patients without surgical correction and 63% and 88% in patients after surgical correction. The probability of giving birth to a live-born infant with no corrective surgery was 30%, 58% and 79% for the first, second and third pregnancy respectively; the probability of giving birth to a live-born infant after corrective surgery was 71% for the first and 86% for the second pregnancy. Fertility is not impaired in patients with bicornuate uterus, but gestational capacity is. A prognostic estimate of the likelihood of giving birth to a live-born infant can be formulated according to the number of pregnancies and/or surgical correction
    • …
    corecore