1,721,166 research outputs found
Pathophysiology roles and translational opportunities of miRNAs in cutaneous melanoma
No full textMelanoma is a malignancy of melanocytes, pigment-producing cells that are predominantly located in the skin. Melanoma accounts for 3%-5% of all cutaneous cancers but determines approximately 75% of all skin cancer deaths. Cutaneous melanoma (CM) affects principally fair-skinned populations, with variable incidence attributable to latitude and differences in sun exposure. The geriatric population is principally affected by this tumor and the median age at diagnosis is 65 years, but this neoplasm is also frequently diagnosed in adolescent and young adult populations. Melanoma incidence increases linearly starting from the age of 25 years until 50. Melanoma affects women and men indifferently, but men are generally more affected. The incidence rates in the world are 3.5% for men and 2.9% for women. When age is considered, adolescent and young adult women are more susceptible to melanoma than men. However, after the age of 40, the rates reverse, and melanoma incidence among men is greater than in women
Supplementary_Figure_1 – Supplemental material for KRAS and ERBB-family genetic alterations affect response to PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC
No full textSupplemental material, Supplementary_Figure_1 for KRAS and ERBB-family genetic alterations affect response to PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC by Marika Cinausero, Noemi Laprovitera, Giovanna De Maglio, Lorenzo Gerratana, Mattia Riefolo, Marianna Macerelli, Michelangelo Fiorentino, Elisa Porcellini, Vanessa Buoro, Francesco Gelsomino, Anna Squadrilli, Gianpiero Fasola, Massimo Negrini, Marcello Tiseo, Manuela Ferracin and Andrea Ardizzoni in Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology</p
Supplementary_table_1 – Supplemental material for KRAS and ERBB-family genetic alterations affect response to PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC
No full textSupplemental material, Supplementary_table_1 for KRAS and ERBB-family genetic alterations affect response to PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC by Marika Cinausero, Noemi Laprovitera, Giovanna De Maglio, Lorenzo Gerratana, Mattia Riefolo, Marianna Macerelli, Michelangelo Fiorentino, Elisa Porcellini, Vanessa Buoro, Francesco Gelsomino, Anna Squadrilli, Gianpiero Fasola, Massimo Negrini, Marcello Tiseo, Manuela Ferracin and Andrea Ardizzoni in Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology</p
Supplementary_table_2 – Supplemental material for KRAS and ERBB-family genetic alterations affect response to PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC
No full textSupplemental material, Supplementary_table_2 for KRAS and ERBB-family genetic alterations affect response to PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC by Marika Cinausero, Noemi Laprovitera, Giovanna De Maglio, Lorenzo Gerratana, Mattia Riefolo, Marianna Macerelli, Michelangelo Fiorentino, Elisa Porcellini, Vanessa Buoro, Francesco Gelsomino, Anna Squadrilli, Gianpiero Fasola, Massimo Negrini, Marcello Tiseo, Manuela Ferracin and Andrea Ardizzoni in Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
