1,720,965 research outputs found
Uncertainty quantification for ocean biogeochemical models
Predicting climate change necessitates a thorough understanding of marine biogeochemical (BGC) processes and the coupling between marine ecosystems and the global carbon cycle. Ocean BGC models are tools employed for this purpose. However, current ocean models used to simulate and thus better understand the ocean BGC processes are highly uncertain in their parameterization. This work delves into research to quantify uncertainties that arise in ocean BGC models and obtain improved parameters to reduce those uncertainties utilizing the BGC ocean model Regulated Ecosystem Model Version 2.
A Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) is performed to identify which parameters most influence the uncertainty of model outputs in a one-dimensional (1-D) configuration at two ocean sites in the North Atlantic (BATS) and the Mediterranean Sea (DYFAMED). This work finds that the grazing parameter, the maximum chlorophyll-to-nitrogen ratio, the photosynthesis parameters, and the chlorophyll degradation rate are significant for BGC simulation.
This dissertation uses ensemble data assimilation to estimate the most important BGC process parameters. First, data assimilation experiments are carried out in a 1-D model using an ensemble Kalman Filter to estimate preselected BGC parameters at BATS and DYFAMED stations. Subsequently, the scope and application of experiments are broadened to a global scale 3-D model by incorporating spatial variations in parameter values. Replacing the default parameter values with the optimal values obtained in this work improves the model outcomes in both 1-D and 3-D configurations. This work underscores the importance of spatially varying parameter optimization and highlights the potential benefits of incorporating spatially varying BGC parameters in regional and global 3-D BGC models. Through such rigorous scientific endeavors, we inch closer to a more coherent understanding of the complex interplay between the ocean BGC processes and the carbon cycle
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Global sensitivity analysis of a one-dimensional ocean biogeochemical model
Ocean biogeochemical (BGC) models are a powerful tool for investigating ocean biogeochemistry and the global carbon cycle. The potential benefits emanating from BGC simulations and predictions are broad, with significant societal impacts from fisheries management to carbon dioxide removal and policy-making. These models contain numerous parameters, each coupled with large uncertainties, leading to significant uncertainty in the model outputs. This study performs a global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of an ocean BGC model to identify the uncertain parameters that impact the variability of model outputs most. The BGC model Regulated Ecosystem Model 2 is used in a one-dimensional configuration at two ocean sites in the North Atlantic (BATS) and the Mediterranean Sea (DYFAMED). Variance-based Sobol' indices are computed to identify the most influential parameters for each site for the quantities of interest (QoIs) commonly considered for the calibration and validation of BGC models. The most sensitive parameters are the chlorophyll to nitrogen ratio, chlorophyll degradation rate, zooplankton grazing and excretion parameters, photosynthesis parameters, and nitrogen and carbon remineralization rate. Overall, the sensitivities of most QoIs were similar across the two sites; however, some differences emerged because of different mixed layer depths. The results suggest that implementing multiple zooplankton function types in BGC models can improve BGC predictions. Further, explicitly implementing heterotrophic bacteria in the model can better simulate the carbon export production and CO2 fluxes. The study offers a comprehensive list of the most important BGC parameters that need to be quantified for future modeling applications and insights for BGC model developments
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Uncertainties in ocean biogeochemical simulations: Application of ensemble data assimilation to a one-dimensional model
Marine biogeochemical (BGC) models are highly uncertain in their parameterization. The value of the BGC parameters are poorly known and lead to large uncertainties in the model outputs. This study focuses on the uncertainty quantification of model fields and parameters within a one-dimensional (1-D) ocean BGC model applying ensemble data assimilation. We applied an ensemble Kalman filter provided by the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework (PDAF) into a 1-D vertical configuration of the BGC model Regulated Ecosystem Model 2 (REcoM2) at two BGC time-series stations: the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) and the Dynamique des Flux Atmosphériques en Méditerranée (DYFAMED). We assimilated 5-day satellite chlorophyll-a (chl-a) concentration and monthly in situ net primary production (NPP) data for 3 years to jointly estimate 10 preselected key BGC parameters and the model state. The estimated set of parameters resulted in improvements in the model prediction up to 66% for the surface chl-a and 56% for NPP. Results show that assimilating satellite chl-a concentration data alone degraded the prediction of NPP. Simultaneous assimilation of the satellite chl-a data and in situ NPP data improved both surface chl-a and NPP simulations. We found that correlations between parameters preclude estimating parameters independently. Co-dependencies between parameters also indicate that there is not a unique set of optimal parameters. Incorporation of proper uncertainty estimation in BGC predictions, therefore, requires ensemble simulations with varying parameter values
- …
