1,720,963 research outputs found

    Spatial brain distribution of intra-axial metastatic lesions in breast and lung cancer patients

    No full text
    The frequency of the diagnosis of brain metastases has increased in recent years, probably due to an increased diagnostic sensitivity. Site predilection of brain lesions in oncological patients at the time of onset, may suggest mechanisms of brain-specific vulnerability to metastasis. The aim of the study is to determine the spatial distribution of intra-axial brain metastases by using voxel-wise statistics in breast and lung cancer patients. For this retrospective cross-sectional study, clinical data and MR imaging of 864 metastases at first diagnosis in 114 consecutive advanced cancer patients from 2006 to 2011 were included. Axial post-gadolinium T1 weighted images were registered to a standard template. Binary lesion masks were created after segmentation of volumes of interest. The voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping approach was used to calculate a t statistic describing the differences between groups. It was found that the lesions were more likely to be located in the parieto-occipital lobes and cerebellum for the total cohort and for the non small cell lung cancer group, and in the cerebellum for the breast cancer group. The voxel-wise inter-group comparisons showed the largest significant clusters in the cerebellum for the breast cancer group (p < 0.0008) and in the occipital lobe (p = 0.02) and cerebellum (p = 0.02) for the non small cell lung cancer group. We conclude a non-uniform distribution of metastatic brain lesions in breast and lung cancer patients that suggest differential vulnerability to metastasis in the different regions of the brain

    Inverse spatial distribution of brain metastases and white matter hyperintensities in advanced lung and non-lung cancer patients

    No full text
    The aim of this study was to test by means of a voxel-based approach the hypothesis that there is a different spatial distribution of brain metastases (BM) and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and that the presence of WMH affects the location of BM in lung and non-lung cancer patients. Two-hundred consecutive cancer patients at first diagnosis of BM were included. Images were acquired using a 1.5 Tesla MRI system (Magnetom Avanto B13, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Axial FLAIR T2 weighted images and gadolinium-enhanced T1 weighted images were post-processed for segmentation, co-registration and analysis. Binary lesion masks were created for WMH and BM, using Volumes of Interest. Lesion probability maps were generated and the voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping approach was used to model each voxel and to calculate a non parametric statistics (Brunner-Munzel test) describing the differences between the groups. In the lung cancer group we found higher frequency of BM in WMH- than in WMH+ patients in the occipital lobe and the cerebellum. In contrast, BM were more frequent in the right frontal lobe in WMH+ than in WMH- patients. We suggest that there exists an inverse brain spatial distribution between WMH and BM. In lung cancer patients, the presence of WMH seems to shift the distribution of BM toward locations different than what it is expected based on primary tumor

    Bilateral MCP Infarct Due to Vertebral Giant Cell Arteritis

    No full text
    We present the case of an 83-year-old woman with an isolated bilateral middle cerebellar peduncles stroke caused by complete occlusion of the right vertebral artery and focal occlusion of the left vertebral artery due to giant cell arteritis. The diagnosis was achieved by integrating MRI, ultrasound study, laboratory data and subsequent pathology analysis after biopsy of the temporal artery

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Epicentral disruption of structural connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease.

    Full text link
    AIMS:Neurodegenerative changes observed in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been suggested to begin at the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus and then to propagate in a stereotypical fashion. Using diffusion-weighted imaging, we test whether disruption of structural connectivity in AD is centered on these "epicenters of disease". METHODS: Fifteen healthy controls, 14 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), 13 mild, and 15 moderate patients with AD were enrolled. The percentages of affected connections directly linking to the epicenter (named first ring) and to nodes with topological distance 2 from the epicenter (named second ring) were calculated. RESULTS: For the group of aMCI patients, just 5.3% of the first ring (n.s.) and 2.9% of the second ring (n.s.) connections were affected. However, for mild AD there was disruption involving 20% of the first ring (P < 0.0001) and 10.3% of the second ring (P < 0.0001) connections. In the moderate AD group, a stronger effect was observed, with 38.0% of the first ring (P < 0.0001) connections and 17.9% of the second ring (P < 0.0001) connections affected. CONCLUSION: Our results favor an epicentral disruption of structural connectivity in aMCI and AD around entorhinal and hippocampal regions, consistent with the transneuronal spread hypothesis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore